30 August 2012

KingCast sees Economic Violence as Verizon tools over loyal customers with broken refurb phones and quasi-criminal contracts.

OMG I just found out the victim bought an iPhone and they were going to knock $120 off her data plan for the year so that would equate to what we discussed i.e. $100.00 off the so-called "subsidized" phone. Then she gets to the store today to buy it and the weasel manager Anthony runs and hides and there is a new $40 activation fee when you already have a plan, plus the $30 in tax these people are The Pits of the World as John McEnroe would say.
One helluva video coming this afternoon.

So you say you and your family have been Verizon customers for 10+ years? They don't care... Because when your Droid breaks down they will send you remanufactured phones that don't function properly and then point you toward a subsidized new phone and shove a new contract down your throat that gets rid of the unlimited data plan. Nice guys, huh? Well not really. And I say that having worked at AT&T corporate headquarters (I'm right smack dab in the middle behind the sign) and at American Tower Corp. (ATC) where I won employee of the week for helping Verizon obtain hundreds of co-location wireless facilities and antennas in their ROFR (Right of First Refusal) project ten years ago. Cute little award LOL. At least when my Droids screw up AT&T gives me a new one. I'm working on a "4G" HTC inspire with Snapdragon.

Verizon sucks because they offer busted-up refurbished phones when your Droid breaks down (as it most surely will LOL). They then force you into an upgrade phone for a couple hundred dollars and won't even cut you a friggin' break when your family has been a 10+ year client. This Country is fast becoming the province of the douchebag, led by the banksters..... I've worked for all the major carriers around (and some long gone beer on the curb for Nextel) and all I can say is: "These guys have some friggin' nerve."

 KingCast: Been there, done that.

28 August 2012

KingCast Kelly Ayotte RNC speech primer: Not ready for prime time.

I forgot to mention it in the movie but idiot girl Kelly Ayotte actually signed onto an initiative not to recognize same sex unions in NH.... unfortunately for her she didn't realize that NH already recognized same sex unions from other states HAHAHAHAA..... what a hater! 

By happenstance I ran into a lobbyist in a Boston suburb yesterday. Said lobbyist -- who shall remain nameless -- is heading to the DNC and is waiting for this movie and I look forward to sending it that's for certain. Kelly Ayotte and Mitt Romney are two United States politicians with horrible track records when it comes to open government, First Amendment and Civil Rights.... but they certainly love the banksters. This is my thumbnail reference movie for Kelly Ayotte, the distaff side of this dynamic duo who presided over the largest consumer fraud in New Hampshire history, the FRM Ponzi scam. And yes there is more. Much more. Get your popcorn ready.

From a Nashua, NH Town Hall meeting last fall: Kelly wants less regulation for big business but more oversight on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Now that is fascinating considering the fact that she still hasn't addressed her failure to investigate the forgery of my name to a mortgage when I worked for a big company, all of which occurred while the FRM Ponzi mortgage consumer scam was brewing. Ayotte was found to be "faulty" on that, I have the whole file sitting on my desk waiting for this occasion. You'll see it in the movie. That little old lady near the front row gets it, why can't Kelly? You better click on that thumbnail to read her letter, I got it on video at 1080p 24fps.

Background video: Kelly Ayotte Town Hall #1 - -"She's pleasant and sweet and full of shit." Background link: No prosecutions for big business on CDO/mortgage fraud or robo-signatures, also see my visits to Senator Ayotte's Washington, DC and Nashua Offices on the forgery matter. Each time I received a promise to investigate, just as I did tonight, only tonight was more exasperated because I went straight to the source.

27 August 2012

KingCast query of the day: What comprises the contents of Trader Joe sushi?

Seriously folks you cannot eat this avocado... and if you do I guarantee you will see it coming straight out the same way it went in because you cannot digest plastic.

KingCast says neither rain nor snow... will keep bikers away from the Cody Eller road rage trial.

The sentencing hearing is allegedly in February. The Motion for New Trial/Set Aside Verdict is still sitting in chambers with an attendant gag order. When you search Pelham Officer Eugene Stahl on this page you'll see the issue. The Union Leader is well aware of the issue and I may mention it next week when we tape Kevin Avard's show in Nashua: The Laurie List debacle is a matter of public interest, and with 60 cops on that list it is a game of Russian Roulette as to when one of them is going to potentially expose the State to some sort of liability. As I note in the video I am disgusted as a former State Attorney, as a former criminal defense attorney and as a past current and future motorcyclist. Anyway here are the State's closing argument segments that I caught on video, and you can clearly see that there is a heavy reliance on Officer Stahl's testimony and credibility. Too bad in the Saviano case a DUI charge was dismissed because of Stahl's conduct in questioning the suspect at the scene.... a similar issue to what is going on in the Cody Eller case. And from what I understand there is yet another more recent case that landed Officer Stahl on the Laurie List.

I say from what I understand because Cody Eller's Motion for a New Trial and to Set Aside the Verdict has been sealed and gag orders on the attorneys are in place. I find all of this to be completely unconstitutional and if I find the time and money I will sue over it. 

The Union Leader has no excuse. They have the time and they most certainly have the money. So where is the intellectual fortitude and Fourth Estate Integrity? On to the closing argument from Kent E. Smith, who is a heavy in the DA's Office.

"It's a simple case......" click to read 15 Jan 2013 journal entry.

4 Sept update:
Trial in mid to late October. I will not know the exact date until the Parties are notified this week.

The trial for road rage punk Cody Eller was supposed to start this week but now I hear that Jury selection has not taken place, contrary to what was represented in the link below in my last update. Also you should know that U.S.A.F. Veteran Mike Gannon is making a good recovery after a cancer scare and a can of Nashua PD pepper spray illegally and Unconstitutionally delivered down his esophagus last year, he may not be able to make it to the Cody Eller Trial but I will be there for him.... whenever it is. You see, based on my conversations with the Hillsborough South Clerk of Courts the trial is not going to come off and Jury selection has not yet occurred, contrary to what was initially reported to Yours Truly. Apparently there were some motions filed, I don't know about that but I do know this:

First, I will ride up this week to review the file and see what has happened.
Second, even if they schedule this trial deep into winter months I'll be there, and whether I get there via car, bike, pogo-stick or hobby horse I will not be alone.

26 August 2012

KingCast sees mom and cops caught lying in nasty Vineyard & Lowell, MA custody case.

This is heinous activity wherein a former medical quality assurance professional is now down on his luck after his green card wife lied about issues of abuse toward her and their two girls. Meanwhile the corrupt and morally aberrant clowns at Lowell, PD won't even accept his complaint about potential abuse against the girls committed by one of the wife's friends. As a former Law Enforcement attorney I find their conduct appalling. 

Not to mention the missing audio on the court CDs that I personally witnessed at the Vineyard when the clerk pretended to play the CD but was really playing the hard drive. They say they are going to allow Mr. Coleman to record directly from the hard drive when he returns. Perhaps I should be with him to make certain he gets the full measure of rights that he has not been afforded on prior occasion. Here is your back story where you can clearly hear the eldest daughter say that the girls won't get any more surprises if they talk about the alleged abuser with the father. Yet and still the Courts and Lowell's finest continue to screw the father while putting the children at peril.

25 August 2012

KingCast asks, "Will the $1B Samsung Apple verdict help R & D fix iLife, iMovie and Final Cut Pro download issues?"

Seriously folks... read madmaxF16's commentary because I am definitely picking up what he is putting down. iPads and iPhones and the like are all good but Apple needs to take care of its core customers. We have been here since the days of the Mac Plus...... the Mac Classic got me through law school in the early '90, twenty friggin' years ago so don't try to play us out the pocket guys. I can't even make a damn movie right now and my MacBook is basically state of the art. Here's the Jury Verdict that I don't even really care about. What I care about is the breaches of warranty on merchantability, fitness to specific purpose and Magnuson-Moss. Here's your back story on the HEAP zone and other issues of abject failure.

23 August 2012

KingCast tells reporter Annmarie Timmins to get her facts straight on NH Senate candidate Josh Youssef, she dropped the ball in the Franconia shootings as well and she is married to the mob.

KingCast: Keeping it Real since 1988. Here is "reporter" Annmarie Timmins' hatchet job on Mr. Youssef, who is a strident force for Justice in New Hampshire. I notice the story is entitled 

"State Senate candidate said to owe taxes, child support...Youssef asked reps to impeach judges."

Implicit in the story is an assertion that Mr. Youssef is doing something wrong, but in point of fact he and many others did ask representatives of the Redress and Grievances Committee to impeach judges, and many of them voted to do just that. I say that Ms. Timmins, who is said to be married to a NH Assistant Attorney General, is a bought-and-sold pawn of the establishment, the very same establishment that harms children and ignores the law, including Ayotte successor Mike Delaney. Annemarie Timmons falsely underreported the number and type of complaints against former NH AG Kelly Ayotte's faux hero Norman Bruce McKay relative to the Franconia shooting tragedy involving Liko Kenney and multiple felon Greg Floyd. Kelly Ayotte also hid Floyd's criminal past from the public in giving him a pass for murder  of Liko Kenney and criminal threats against Caleb Macaulay. Fortunately the citizens of North Country were savvy enough to come together to twice prevent a road being named in his honor. 

The House voted 19-0 to table that nonsense, just the facts, ma'am. Bruce McKay's ex-wife, while married, is said to have moved to a safe house and definitely filed a TRO on him around about the time she gave birth to their only child. As a former Assistant Attorney General and major press reporter myself, I condemn this yellow journalism masquerading as fact. 
Meanwhile Senator Kelly Ayotte and current NH AG Mike Delaney protect Wendy L. Smith, the mother of Michael Holman's children, despite a rap sheet longer than Kelly Ayotte's Pinocchio nose as seen above: The Truth hurts doesn't it Annmarie? But it hurts us as adults much less than it hurts children, not that you really care.

Mr. Youssef responds: 

Dear Youssef for Senate Supporter, The Concord Monitor has succeeded in introducing an entirely new “shade of yellow” to their “journalism.” To say the article is a gross distortion of the truth is a kindness to its “journalist,” Annmarie Timmins, who relied upon untruths provided by my ex-wife’s divorce lawyer Ed Mosca. 

Note that this hit-piece does not even tackle a single policy issue confronting our state, but rather seeks to berate me on a personal level.

KingCast and Mortgage Movies say "What a coincidence that nurse Jennifer Gallagher from the Aurora, Colorado shootings should mysteriously drown while swimming with an unidentified friend late at night."

Here is my first journal entry on the matter, and here is a poorly-written NBC News story running two weeks after the occurrence, strange that. But hell you know me, I'm not one for conspiracy theories but the whole thing sure does reek of Black Ops don't it? I'd almost be willing to bet that Adult Friend Finder page is bogus too.

21 August 2012

18 August 2012

KingCast presents: Wedding Party!

Well sports fans its a wedding party! Congrats, Sis. It is a screen capture from video. So funny to see Wilbon in person, I haven't seen him in a few years. It's like to the World he's Mr. Sports to me he's just longhead Cousin Mike LOL. He's funny but not as funny as my father that's for sure. Meanwhile my old man and one of my sisters act like they've never seen bubbles before LOL....

17 August 2012

KingCast addresses those who claim "No one takes you seriously.... you're in it for yourself."

It is much more accurate to say the people don't like me and try to marginalize everything I do, particularly in the incestuous little provinces of New England. I know for fact that policies and practices and court rules have been modified or changed directly because of me in part because I defined and created the genre of cinema verite entertainment courtroom video. Anyway as to the headline it is so funny that in order to prove otherwise I have to name names and sources who must remain private.  But suffice it to say I have a small network of attorneys and police who provide me with information that is quite useful in exposing deceit and corruption. When it comes to major media and many politicos or some LE I don't take them too seriously, and I'll give you an example:

When Judge Timothy Vaughn found that I prevailed in RSA 91-A Right to Know matters related to the Franconia and Kelly Ayotte coverups in the Liko Kenney Greg Floyd Bruce McKay double homicide then he failed to make the Town pay for my expenses, so clearly he doesn't take me seriously.

To the extent that U.S. Senator Kelly Ayotte "doesn't take me seriously" I wonder why people take her seriously given that she allowed for the biggest consumer fraud in New Hampshire history on her watch, the FRM Ponzi scam I ask her about at this Nashua Town Hall meeting. Besides, she has never actually won a First Amendment criminal or civil trial, whereas I have won and settled several and gained advantages for my former clients each and every time. Here's one example caught on video where Prosecutor Robert Tobias failed to shake my hand after he lost. So he must not "take me seriously either LOL." 

Not long before that the City of Gahanna did not take me seriously either.

Now people take white establishment lawyer Mike McLaughlin seriously though, and I find that interesting, here's why: Back in the Day Marcus Garvey was tried and convicted of mail fraud for promising blacks a better life in another Country. He was All Done at the point.  But nowadays you can be a white lawyer and get convicted of mail fraud, get disbarred, go to prison and come back to be of counsel with Shaheen & Gordon in NH, a top notch law firm. Michael McLaughlin, google it. Guess who helped cover up some of  his nefarious actions? None other than Kelly Ayotte of course, read the comments. RIP Marcus you got brothers still keeping it real in this here time. 

But I digress: I note that Kelly hires the biggest and baddest well-connected lawyers she can find to fight me. These lawyers at McLane, Graff used to employ both Ayotte and the first Judge to hear the case, Landya B. McCafferty, who slammed me while neither she or any of these fine, upstanding lawyers, including NH Bar Association President Jennifer Parent thought it appropriate to disclose the relationship. So I guess you could say that people are right, because if they took me seriously they would never try to pull that stunt, so I had to embarrass Landya B. McCafferty into recusal.

To the extent that Boston Superlawyer Jeffrey Denner didn't take me seriously as Boston Bob, well he got embarrassed with I kicked his ass on the blogging issue and then Proskauer, Rose et al. filed suit on behalf of Denner's former client Derrick Gillenwater. Denner then had to pay Mr. Gillenwater on a legal malpractice claim. But Harvard quit covering it when they discovered it was me, so I guess yah another example of people not taking me seriously still LOL....

To the extent that some journalists or Adam Klein or the Spence school or major media "don't take me seriously" that is more an indictment of them, not me. If the Spence school is happy with a "deadbeat dad" felon on its Board of Directors c'est la vie. I simply put the facts out there and let the chips fall where they may. Having worked in major media where tens of thousands of people read my storied about ordinary shit, I would rather reach a few thousand now with real shit. If somebody "doesn't care" or sticks their head in the sand well that's life and I'm not really here to argue with them, not too much anyway. Because when you argue with a jackass from a distance no one can tell who is whom.
I will leave you with this: To the extent that dirty foreclosure mills "don't take me seriously" why bother calling the police or asking me to leave. If I'm no threat and just foolish sit down with me and let me demonstrate how foolish I am by asking foolish questions about proof of standing to foreclose, right?  

And for any lawyer who claims that, go to KingCast.net and watch "Live Revolution" when my client says "I thank God for an attorney who won't turn you away because you ain't go no money."

And I've never changed or compromised my beliefs that even poor folks are entitled to vigorous and zealous representation before the powers-that-be. Meanwhile most of the lawyers who take potshots about me wouldn't help an old lady across the street without a $5K retainer and they have long since surrendered their First Amendment licenses so they can pretty much kiss my ass anyway LOL. The key here is that I actually don't think it is all about me nor do I take myself too seriously because I recognize the much of the system is a joke in and of itself. What should be more troubling is the fact that some of these people who criticize me take themselves too seriously in the first place. I would never want to be fighting for biggest turd honors in a cesspool of legal filth.

16 August 2012

KingCast and many others say: Supertramp and/or Evergreen Social Media Associates are playing YouTube hardball for no reason; copyright douchebags.

UMG.... sucks. Remember the Sex Pistols EMI?
Well EMI sold out to UMG.... and it gets worse from there.
The Spitzer lawsuit was just the tip of the iceberg.
Now YouTube lets them flip flop on me twice in one day,
Sorry guys the first approval constitutes a waiver.
I will find another lawyer and sue these pigs.
Intellectual property is not my forte but I know right from wrong.
2 Jan 2012 Second Update, they flip-flopped.

2 Jan 2012 update: UMG reviewed and released me, I win again.

Motherfucker they are back again!!!!
21 Dec. 2012
UMG.... but look what YouTube first said about UMG back on 16 August, no problem!!!
Information about your video "Supertramp: It's Raining Again... In Brooklyn." Inbox x YouTube Aug 16 to me help center | e-mail options | report spam Dear KingCast65, Your video "Supertramp: It's Raining Again... In Brooklyn.", may have content that is owned or licensed by UMG, but it’s still available on YouTube! In some cases, it may be blocked, or ads may appear next to it. This claim is not penalizing your account status. Visit your Copyright Notice page for more details on the policy applied to your video. Sincerely, - The YouTube Team © 2012 YouTube, LLC 901 Cherry Ave, San Bruno, CA 94066

So what, now all of a sudden 4 months later it's a fucking problem? What a goddamn bunch of hemorrhoids Supertramp and their agents are being. So my response:

Oh BTW I won my case....as you can see in the video both of my Supertramp vids from that rainy day in New York are back live. I've lost only one YouTube argument and I'm still looking into that one, involving a Seattle slumlord named Savannah Fuentes. I did put up a second video in her case. 
Nearly 500,000 views, hundreds of musical selections and never a problem.... until yesterday. Supertramp and/or Evergreen Media Associates are among the last holdouts of artists or agencies who would actually go for a strike against people for using their music in a non-for-profit context on the Internet, specifically in YouTube videos. I remember 4,5,6 years ago this was an issue but then the music World woke up and changed the business model. 

The fact that Supertramp -- a prog rock band -- is apparently so retrograde in actual practice will forever taint my opinion of them. And what is so funny is that when I sent the videos to a friend of mine yesterday who works in Boston's Entertainment Industry she said "I'll have to watch with no sound because I hate Supertramp for some reason." Well I just gave her one, Fucking A. And I've got a bloody right to say it. Copyright that, bitches.

I spent a long time editing a rainstorm movie in Brooklyn yesterday. It  was not for profit and the music was all Supertramp, Breakfast in America in the first version and It's Raining Again was the track in a virtually identical second version. Here are the stills that remain. YouTube sent out its typical "no big deal" notice, informing that advertisements may be posted by folks with legal profit rights to the songs. Come to find out that these guys are viewing Fair Use in a way materially inconsistent with the enjoyment and celebration of the work, as noted. Plus I've never had a YouTube infringement issue. Now I have two in one day and like others I am fairly insulted that they just don't issue a warning or something when you go to purchase the songs because most of us logically believe that we've not exceeded Fair Use guidelines by paying no-for-profit homage to a band we love. This seems senseless and much ado about nothing.

Judge Debra Silber GLBT Reverse Discrimination against Sandy Chadee pt.2.

The New York Courts are reading along!
What's next?
Try to order the fit mother to undergo psychiatric examination
to try to cover their tracks, that's what's next.
Remember, I was a State Attorney I know The Game.

1 Sept 2012 update: Carlos Pena (the father) assaulted a police officer last night when mother served papers for visitation modification on him because of bad environment. He is still in jail. Forensic physician said he was "intrinsically violent." 

The Rule 59E Motion was denied, look what I wrote to Ms. Shadee:
Judge Mauskopf is being completely disingenuous, it does much more than restate your original position, it mentions the fact that the Decision never mentioned the GAL. And the manifest injustice that was also not considered by the Court is the complete denial of First Amendment Rights to discuss Religion with your son. Another Jewish woman protecting two Jewish women fancy that. No haterism here my GF is Jewish and so were the last two before her. Just sayin'. Hang in there guys get up with your lawyers and keep on keepin' on. 
Recall that Judge Silber ruled that Ms. Chadee cannot even discuss religion with her son because of a perceived bias against GLBT because Ms. Chadee was a Jehovah's Witness. That ruling is, in and of itself, as Unconstitutional as they come. Here is your back story, Guardian at litem type and co-Defendant Kaufman is still on the underlying case, which is set for a hearing next week on custody. Mother Sandy Chadee contends that her son is able to articulate more unsavory facts about his living environment as he grows older, and it has been nearly two (2) years since the unprincipled Decision by Defendant Debra Silber. As one can see in the KingCast short film, Ms. Chadee asserts that the Truth will come out.