No Presentation as the Court sidestepped it. Take this: My Surreply wth a note from Livi's Mom.
I'm sick and tired of having this Court bark at me when Kristina is the one who has been abusing this system for a long, long, time. So this time I have nothing to say except to present this video in tandem with the Trial Brief and other Motions I have already filed. These Motions include the Motion for lost wages and the Motion to Recuse Judge Beth Fraser, who should have immediately passed this case on to someone else and notified me that she formerly represented Kristina Robinson. Or Kristina Amlak depending on what day it is or what cause she is championing or what Internet search engines she is trying to hide from.
She has not filed any substantive responses to any of my filings yet I am still stuck up in this Court dealing with her abuse of the legal system until we get our fundraiser going this week so that we can rightfully sue her for what we believe to be wanton reckless conduct in the murder by dog of our Best Friend Livi. This entire exercise has been an abusive waste of time by her, yet the Court is making sure to get its licks in against me, the victim in all of this nonsense.
I am making a record of it.
Yah. Nothing has changed since February and the Court can readily see that from the pleadings but he is still riding me like a Georgia mule. A Judge with a history of disrespect and retaliation for those who criticize him refuses to allow cameras in Court. The Nugget:
D. Judge Goodwin’s Retaliatory Record is a Cause of Substantial Concern: Respondent is not comfortable with Judge Goodwin presiding over his case without cameras. He has already recently been punished for retaliatory and uncivil conduct against someone questioning his integrity, and Respondent resolutely questions that integrity because of, inter alia, the issues countenanced in Section III, supra.
As such, Respondent respectfully demands that this Court specifically identify any and all passages from any filings in this Court that it finds to be unreasonably tainted by antipathy. That will be crucial in the event that the Court again rejects a request for Media coverage.
Here's a comment from a litigant before he was a Judge...... he was a jerk Prosecutor:
Yes, I saw him when he was a prosecuting attorney for Edmonds. My lawyer sent me in to court with some paperwork so my attorney didn't need to be there. He started lecturing me saying what do you do for work? I said metal fabrication. He said if i came into your work would I make a very good fabricator, so don't come into my court and try to play lawyer. He's arrogant and an egoist. I met him as a judge too....
He likes to try to use his loud voice to intimidate. I hope everything works out for you Chris... Keep on him.
Some background about Livi's killer.