30 August 2016

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Present: The Arrow of Truth and Justice.

Because I need it in my personal life. 
Because the World needs it in my business life.
Other folks have their own reasons for their arrows.

Namaste.


26 August 2016

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Update on Yet Another Wells Fargo Multiple Allonge Fraudulent Foreclosure in Snohomish County No. 16-2-02643-3.


 

14 October 2016 Update: John Stumpf resigned, is fired, or whatever.... he's out. See this BBC story. It pretty much doesn't matter who replaces him, what matters most is that he and some of the corporate low-life thugs who presided over the fraudulent accounts and fraudulent Chain of Title processes be imprisoned.  I wrote their attorneys today:

On Oct 13, 2016, at 06:31 PM, Christopher King <kingcast955@icloud.com> wrote:

It's always tough to lose a CEO.

I was friends with Pat Bricker we played tennis together and I remember when his dad got the axe but it was nowhere near as nefarious 

Ciao

Sent from my iPhone

We all know that in NY Attorney Linda Tirelli, the Federal District Court and BK Judge Michael Drain are busy schooling Wells Fargo for manufactured documents. From the 5 October Adversary Complaint in Franklin v. Wells Fargo:
Further, the Bankruptcy Court determined that Wells Fargo’s corporate witness, Mary Ellen Brust (“Ms. Brust”), lacked credibility and offered no information as to how or if Freddie Mac ever possessed the Debtor’s Note. Nor did Brust have personal knowledge regarding the condition of the indorsement on the note as her testimony was that she never saw the original note. 
Further, right here in Seattle, Washington we see the same exact sort of shenanigans in the case I have been working on or following for the past two (2) years as a housing advocate until I had to pass it off to local licensed Counsel Scott Stafne. Inadmissible Affidavits from people who had no Firsthand Knowledge of anything per FRE Rule 602. They never learn. They just keep on bullying, it is their modus operandi, part of their creepy corporate DNA.

Read this journal entry for more. Much more. I'm sure David Dayen and I will discuss it all on Saturday at his book signing. You remember Writer Dayen, right?  From Seattle's Marie McDonnell fiasco where they hired her as a paid consultant yet refused to allow her to present her work on the MERS/King County Audit even as Multnomah County actually sued MERS..... 

Note: The book signing for "Chain of Title" (NY Times) has been postponed owing to inclement weather.





26 August Update:  It looks like K & L Gates is possible Special Counsel. Take a look, and as you do so, read the lower portion of this Revised Journal Entry including reference to a relevant Ohio case, Riddle v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147694 (2015).


Meanwhile, today's 1 Oct 2016 email to all Counsel


2 minutes ago at 6:29 AM 


I've got quite the library over the years. I forgot my observations of Wells Fargo even include a lawyer I am damn sure committed PERJURY. 


 "I've got the original Note in my desk back at the office," he says in hushed tones. I had to push the volume in order to render it audible from the shotgun mic. 


SURE you have the original Note back at your office, Attorney Masterson.... sure you do. 


Ciao.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_lwjNvqdcI



2 minutes ago at 6:08 AM 


To coin a phrase from Geico: "When you're Wells Fargo, you make up documents..... it's what you do!" I am in NY right now -- New Rochelle -- and may stop over to see Attorney Tirelli, whom I have cc'd in this case on multiple occasions. Fascinating how life works, isn't it. No, I'm not asking.... I'm telling. (I'm actually here for my mother's birthday and some work on a certain homicide case but hey in all my spare time, right....anyway I'm sure she's quite proud of my work and that's what counts).



I like Fn 8/9 and the subsequent discussion, which I am now placing on my journal page: 

8 Although Wells Fargo states in its brief that it objected to the admission of the Kennerty deposition and that the bankruptcy court “never actually admitted it” and should not have admitted it because the testimony “was not relevant to the issue being tried, and clearly was more prejudicial than it was probative,” (Appellant Br. 16, 20), Wells Fargo does not directly challenge the use of the testimony in its Statement of Issues Presented on Appeal. Regardless, the testimony was relevant to the issue of whether the indorsement was authentic. Seeing as he signed the Assignment of Mortgage, Kennerty obviously had some role with respect to Debtor’s loan. He also testified based on personal knowledge as to the practices of the assignment and indorsement teams at Wells Fargo. The fact that Wells Fargo had assignment and indorsement teams that, as the bankruptcy court found, would act to improve the record with respect to various notes and deeds of trust in Wells Fargo’s possession, makes the fact that the indorsement at issue here was added after-the-fact to improve Wells Fargo’s standing more probable “than it would be without the evidence.” Fed. R. Evid. 401(a). 


 9 Also, as with MERS’s/Kennerty’s lack of authority to assign the Deed of Trust in light of the fact Washington Mutual had ceased to exist, the In re Tarantola court found that the afterthe-fact allonge would have been ineffective to transfer the note because the party executing it “had no authority to do so.” In re Tarantola, 2010 WL 3022038, at *4. It stands to reason that a claimant who is willing to execute an unauthorized document to create standing is more likely willing to forge a blank indorsement to create standing as well. 


 *********** 


Wells Fargo contends that the evidence relied upon by the bankruptcy court consisted entirely of unjustified speculation and conclusory allegations that cannot serve as the competent evidence necessary to overcome the indorsement’s presumption of validity. (See, e.g., Appellant Br. 20 (“The Bankruptcy Court’s assumption . . . that Kennerty must have forged indorsements is precisely the sort of speculation that cannot rise to the level of ‘competent evidence’ that the [blank] indorsement . . . was forged.”); Reply Br. for Appellant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Reply Br.”) 2 (Dkt. No. 24) (“Speculative and conclusory assertions are all that the Bankruptcy Court and [Debtor] could point to.”).) 


Wells Fargo is correct that if Debtor’s evidence merely raised some “metaphysical doubt” as to the validity of the indorsement, Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586 (1986), Debtor would not have satisfied its burden and thus would not have overcome the presumption of validity in § 3.308, see, e.g., In re Connelly, 487 B.R. 230, 244 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2013) (holding that the plaintiff, who challenged the authenticity of a deed of trust and other relevant documents but only “promised to bring forth additional evidence at a later date,” relied on “metaphysical doubt [rather] than evidence deserving all reasonable inference”). 


Here, however, Debtor has not relied on mere speculation and conclusory assertions to overcome the presumption. Rather, Debtor offered specific evidence from which the bankruptcy court found that a reasonable juror could draw the inference that the blank indorsement was not genuine. Wells Fargo’s arguments to the contrary are not persuasive. 

 
Sent from my iPhone 








Oh, brother. Remember last year when I told you about the file that had the two Allonges in it, one direct from Deep Green to Wachovia/Wells Fargo and one endorsed in blank?  And how when I asked WF which one was attached to the Note, they told me it was the one in blank....  which was bullshit because they are only saying that so that they can play the bearer paper game, right:  Holder of the Note has the Right to Foreclose.

You see, when I asked for the Original Note it was MIA but they had some guy who actually worked at Kay Jewelers or Zales -- one of the two I forget -- sign a Lost Note Affidavit even though he couldn't have any Actual or Constructive Knowledge of what the hell he was talking about because he was busy slinging lowbrow jewelry to the masses when the family allegedly signed the Note. Insane, right?  But welcome to the Wacky World of Wells Fargo. Honorable U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain cracked Wells Fargo's head open over similar fabrications not long ago so one would think they would learn, right? Apparently not, so they want to pass this Rule 11 hot mess on to the next Counsel, so I can go badger them when it comes time for a public Court hearing right.



Well anyway since that time we've seen Marie McDonnell review the purported Allonges and she agreed and went on to say that they're not even recordable documents.

Meanwhile in the related Foreclosure Case Snohomish County No. 16-2-02643-3, Wells Fargo even committed a Rule 11 violation in my opinion by arguing that they were in First Position. This is an argument heretofore never advanced and believe me I have been deep into it with their Routh, Crabtree & Olsen ("RCO") attorneys for more than a year as a housing advocate before referring it out to Learned Counsel Scott Stafne.   So Ms. McDonnell and Attorney Stafne worked together and Counterclaimed a Fair Debt Collection Practices ("FDCPA") Action, which apparently predicated RCO or the client (WF) to punt for new, Special Counsel, identity not disclosed. And when I say not disclosed, I mean not disclosed for a couple of weeks now to my understanding.


The family's renewed offer of Settlement remains stagnant and on the table, I guess. Guessing is all one can do at this point because none of this makes any sense. Read the recent emails below with RCO Attorneys Synova M.L. Edwards and Janaya L. Carter at the helm:



16 August 2016

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Present: One Lap at Grace Cole Park with Bonobo, Bob Marley and Livi the Wonderdog!


From Bonobo to all my people... remember.... you are.... important.... to a lot of people.....

12 August 2016

KingCast Presents: Throwback Thursday Circa 1994 at the Ohio Attorney General's Office.

‪#‎throwbackthursday‬ Holy cow I found an online picture of me as an Assistant Attorney General, practicing oral argument in 1994. James Barnes, Chief, Cheryl Nester Assistant Section Chief (they have since changed Sections) and some Attorney named Chip and some attorney named Steve. Wow. Thats 22 years ago. Seems like yesterday.  

Little did I know what my career would look like in 2017 but I have a clear focus now, y'all stay tuned because loose lips sink ships. All of that was too small an ocean for a man of my Vision, Drive and Determination.

10 August 2016

KingCast Says Happy Birthday Kevin Michael Holmqvist!

So for those of you who don't know.... Kevin is The Man:  He summed up my Civil Rights, Social and Consumer activism thusly:

He fucks with people who fuck with The People.

Love it.

09 August 2016

KingCast Presents: Backfire Motorcycle Night #64 Stills and Ride-Through.


Miss Sarah, telling' it!
This one's definitely for you, kid.
The video is coming by tomorrow morning!

A full set of stills may be seen at my FB page album.

KingCast and an Entire Shoreline Community Celebrate the Life of Ahmie Bin Njie at Ahmie Palooza 2016!


Ahmie Palooza is a beautiful event for a beautiful young lady who left us way too early. Shoreline is no stranger to these types of medical tragedies (Keep Calm and Sophie On, 2015) but the way that the Community comes together to support the legacy and to seek advanced medical research is very special indeed.

I am proud to live here.

Stay tuned for video and a full set of stills by Wednesday morning or Thursday evening. Meanwhile we have still shots of Ahmie, the inimitable Nan Skinner and one cute child with Mom!

Our family lost a sister I never met. I have the only known picture of her in my room, Michelle left us as a pre-toddler in 1958, about 7 years before I was born. We think it was a combination of TB and/or meningitis but of course back then things weren't quite so clear. 

Shoreline Area News.
Ahmie Bin Njie website.
Ahmie Palooza FB page.

08 August 2016

KingCast, Mortgage Movies, Wally Brown and Chris Nubbe to Sue Pierce County Superior Judge Stanley J. Rumbaugh for Violating GR 16, and First Amendment/Free Press in Fannie Mae v. Brenda Duzan Foreclosure Case.


Mark Lindquist - Ethics
Stephen D. Trinnen and Daniel R. Hamilton are two of the lawyers in Prosecutor Mark Lindquist's ethically-challenged office who perpetuate the problem. They are defending Judge Stanley Rumbaugh for refusing to allow camera access in his courtroom in direct and blatant contravention of Washington GR 16, and they are lying their butts off to do so. We are simply not going to tolerate it, and complaints are being lodged with the State Bar, The Judicial Overseers and in Federal Court for Fraud upon the Court. Take a look.


This is a complete abuse of authority.
The Court violated Washington Article 1 §5, the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Rule GR 16 that compels concrete findings by the Court prior to any denial.

RULE GR 16 -- COURTROOM PHOTOGRAPHY AND RECORDING BY THE NEWS MEDIA (a) Video and audio recording and still photography by the news media are allowed in the courtroom during and between sessions, provided 

(1) that permission shall have first been expressly granted by the judge; and 

(2) that media personnel not, by their appearance or conduct, distract participants in the proceedings or otherwise adversely affect the dignity and fairness of the proceedings. 

(b) The judge shall exercise reasonable discretion in prescribing conditions and limitations with which media personnel shall comply. 

(c) If the judge finds that sufficient reasons exist to warrant limitations on courtroom photography or recording, the judge shall make particularized findings on the records at the time of announcing the limitations. This may be done either orally or in a written order. In determining what, if any, limitations should be imposed, the judge shall be guided by the following principles: 

(1) Open access is presumed; limitations on access must be supported by reasons found by the judge to be sufficiently compelling to outweigh that presumption; 

(2) Prior to imposing any limitations on courtroom photography or recording, the judge shall, upon request, hear from any party and from any other person or entity deemed appropriate by the judge; and 

(3) Any reasons found sufficient to support limitations on courtroom photography or recording shall relate to the specific circumstances of the case before the court rather than reflecting merely generalized views.

KingCast Presents Separated at Birth: Livi the Wonderdog and Dirty Harry/Clint Eastwood.

#‎Livithewonderdog‬ ‪#‎derp‬ ‪#‎KingCast‬ Livi is my favorite derp! Also a little ‪#‎ClintEastwood‬ going on in this one as well. Clearly, I have issues that may require some professional treatment.... or a dinner with Gary Larson. http://www.thefarside.com/

So.... You feel lucky punk? Well do yah???