30 May 2013

KingCast Sees "Deadbeat Dad" eMusic CEO Adam Klein Trial Day Two in Child Support Malpractice Lawsuit: Daralyn Khan v. Eric Karp.

April 2014 Update:

This dirty motherfucker is no longer with eMusic and switched jobs and is doing so in a way to avoid paying child support/insurance benefits. More to come.

How did the Impounded documents make it to trial and why are they relevant?
Answer: The Documents from the closed, impounded custody case resulting from Adam Klein fighting fatherhood got there by and through Lee Levine's office because I went to the Middlesex Courthouse to meet Ms. Khan and another Court observer as Ms. Khan discovered that Defendant Karp and his attorney Joseph Berman are using documents they obtained through deceit and deception!  

I believe this conduct is unethical and I may file a complaint with the Board of Bar Overseers (BBO) on it. They will probably make it go away but it must be done nonetheless: Nan Sauer is an attorney with whatever permutation of Lee, Levine Bowser's office is called these days. Prior to that she was a law clerk at Middlesex Probate, possibly during the time that Registrar cum felon John Buonomo was busy robbing the place blind. So she knows full well that only the parents should be having access to the closed case files in cases from 1992 that were automatically impounded. More on this later. Now Lee Levine helped Spencer Kagan in his ascension to the bench after Gus Celluci had tapped him for the position but Kagan had a pending lawsuit and ethics issues and he arguably lied about those on his application. Judge Kagan presided over Ms. Khan's case and took the legally enforceable opinion that was adverse to her (and adverse to Defendant Karp) in finding palpable ambiguity in the Agreement drafted by Karp. See Karp Affidavit, infra

Nan Sauer went to the courthouse on 28 May 2012 and apparently illegally obtained copies of two negative orders by putting in an appearance as "pro se." She did then forward these orders for use by Attorney Berman, as he would have had no legal access to these documents. That's pretty sleazy, but then what did you expect, we're dealing with Middlesex Probate Court after all.

Here's the fun part: I predicted this a year ago, in April of 2012 in this Journal Entry. Here's an excerpt:
Now Denner's office has apparently reneged on a promise it made a long time ago to amend the complaint against Karp, and my little birdy tells me that all of these guys -- including Attorney Rivers -- pictured, right -- are discussing her legal malpractice case. Why Rivers? He has no horse in this race, and if anything should be called as her witness against Karp....
So Lee, Levine --- who used to take up residency in this journal -- is so pissed off at Ms. Khan and the exposure this case has generated that they will go to any unethical length they can think of in order to try to stain Daralyn Khan when none of this would have happened if their felonious, sexually-harassing client had honored his Agreement.


Zurich... is large and in charge in front of the Courthouse.
And as Defendant Karp's insurer, they do not value Ms. Khan.  

Today's movie will be up late night, but I'm sure the key players will be waiting and watching. They always are.

Here is Day One.

Here's some food for thought: How did Eric Karp get hold of recent documents in an impounded case? He resigned as her counsel a long time ago. So depending on the timeframe either one of her subsequent counsel like Jeffrey Denner (another snake) gave it to him or he went in to Court and got it himself even though he should have already filed his withdrawal. But if he had filed his withdrawal then he would not have had access to the document. The Court cannot simply say "some of this is relevant" if a document was illegally obtained there could be sanctions issued against the offending attorney right. Right. At least that's the way it is supposed to happen. Note: We now know how the documents were obtained, through sleaze and deception by and through a licensed attorney, i.e. Nan Sauer, supra.

Today is interesting because the Court admonished at the outset that this is not about Adam Klein and his bad actions. I don't have an exact quote but that was the gist of it. The problem is, however, his bad actions and complete neglect of his daughter directly influenced the causes and courses of action that Daralyn Khan had to take in order to protect the interests of their daughter. Furthermore, the Defendant, knowing Klein's propensity for fraud and deceit and slow payments, should have had a raised state of awareness so as to avoid giving Adam Klein any loopholes.... which again is entirely consistent with his own Affidavit as noted in yesterday's movie and journal entry linked, above.

So on my ride home I thought more about today's events vis a vis my knowledge of much of the entire case and the judges involved, i.e. Dilday, Kagan and Gibson, but more on that momentarily. First I shall complete my thoughts on Adam Klein's criminal nature and other arguably nefarious and unfatherly conduct:

First, he is a known, convicted felon for charges that were issued well into his adult, professional life. That should tell a practitioner of reasonable experience on Actual, Heightened Notice right ab initio

Second, as noted in yesterday's courtroom summary Adam Klein fought paternity on three (3) different levels, including a scientific test. Apparently he believed Ms. Khan to be a bit of a slut, when in point of fact he should be looking in the mirror relative to his sexual harassment of one Aimee MacCormac in the eMusic lawsuit that settled five (5) months ago. Be that as it may, it is yet another indicator that Adam Klein should be approached with substantial care.

Third, Adam Klein repeatedly late-paid. See above.

Fourth, Expert Witness Stephen Kuzma made a valid point in noting that the malpractice exists, ipso facto because of Defendant Karp's own Affidavit, which is of course an Admission per FRCP 801(d)(2) and I'm sure by the same stateside code in MA whatever it is. The Affidavit stressed the intent of the parties in that it did not have a finite end to the term unless there was a VALID COURT ORDER pursuant to litigation or negotiation/mediation. But Judge Spencer M. "Boobies" Kagan determined that  there was ambiguity and he resolved the matter adversely to Plaintiff Khan precisely because of the clauses at issue herein. 

But prior to that, guess what? In attempting to mitigate her damages, Ms. Khan had tried to bring a case against Adam Klein way back in the Day, but Judge Dilday ruled the Court did not have jurisdiction and refused to review the Drivers' License and voting records that to me clearly show that Adam Klein lied about his residency, surprise surprise. The documents are here
Next Spencer Kagan had the case for another two years and issued adverse rulings without disclosing that Khan's opposing counsel Lee Levine & Bowser were instrumental in getting him to the Bench because he had pending litigation/disciplinary issues, and that's a fact, Jack. He eventually recused and then Judge Dorothy Gibson got the case and it took another two years for anything to happen, so it's not as if Ms. Khan has sat on her hands here. 

It's not surprising she can't work much more than she has because she's had to fight a legal army --- and the Courts -- for Justice.

29 May 2013

KingCast Sees "Deadbeat Dad" eMusic CEO Adam Klein Trial Commence in Child Support Malpractice Lawsuit: Daralyn Khan v. Eric Karp.

April 2014 Update:

This dirty motherfucker is no longer with eMusic and switched jobs and is doing so in a way to avoid paying child support/insurance benefits. More to come.

Day three preview: 
How did the Impounded documents make it to trial and why are they relevant?

Today's Trial Summary is coming by 7:45p.
On Thursday the 30th I will be watching for impounded docs.
Meanwhile folks are watching KingCast coverage, as usual:

Daralyn Khan breaks down recalling how Adam Klein told her to have an abortion 
after he seduced her and the pair had been dating for several months.
As we see, "Dr. Klein" is adept at seducing, or trying to seduce younger women. 
Sometimes however instead of hanging drawers he is getting sued.
A pensive Eric Karp, Esq.
You know Adam Klein's own disfavored daughter called the guy a "Deadbeat Dad" right? The guy ("Dr. Klein" as some call him) paid according to support Agreement for six (6) years and then stopped paying, citing a clause in the Agreement that is something akin to Slick Willie's "Depends on the definition of is." Now the mother, Daralyn Khan, is suing her lawyer for leaving open such loopholes and for not making assurances that Adam Klein would not pay less than the support guidelines. This case has more twists and turns than Mulholland Drive, but for now simply check my Notice of Media Coverage. Excerpt:
I have been following this case for more than five (5) years now as it involves the fullest extant of a situation in which the CEO of a multinational corporation and journalism professor at Columbia University has a substantial criminal background as an International felon out of South Africa, and has recently settled a sexual harassment lawsuit at his current place of employment, eMusic. The fact that he exerts substantial power of influence over hundreds of thousands of people, if not millions, is a matter of public interest given his public transgressions. My research further indicates that he lied about his residency in order to avoid service in the underlying case. I'll post that link today.

Interestingly, the Court held yesterday that this is not a guidelines case. But that begs the question: Can private parties ever negotiate a contractual obligation that results in payment of less than what the State guarantees as the minimal requirements for the health and welfare of the child? The answer I am told, is yes... but only with prior court approval. And why on Earth would a millionaire entertain such a notion in the first place?

I don't know, maybe perhaps he's the type of guy would would be (and is) a felon. Maybe perhaps because he is the kind of guy who, at 60, and more importantly while married, tried to smash up on eMusic underling Aimee McCoormack and ended up settling a sexual harassment lawsuit just several months ago!

From Dylan Love's Business Insider story 24 Jan, 2012.
The Courts, especially by and through one Spencer M. Kagan, have coddled this man and punished the mother empirically. My position as a former trial attorney is to say that the American and World Public has a right to know how the Court systems works when the rich and powerful are involved and that is precisely why I am here. eMusic follows my journal page, Chris King’s First Amendment Page and watches my videos:  

27 May 2013

KingCast Tells Rutgers: Go Back To The Well, And Make Certain It's Not Poisoned This Time.

Julie Hermann?  Really? What a great story by Connor Simpson. Having practiced employment law, and having gone through the wringer myself at the backdating stock option American Tower Corp., I cringe. Steve Dodge and (then) HR Veep Aileen Torrance, two of the biggest massholes I have ever seen.

Anyway Rutgers must fire Hermann right now based on her lack of candor alone. You don't "forget" being a goddamn bridesmaid and catching the bouquet that's some life-changing material right there. I'll never "forget" standing in for my best friend's father at his wedding in England. What a friggin' liar she is.

25 May 2013

Peace! From the Current and OG KingCasters.

My father, as a chemist in training, drove an orange Volvo, wore Jesus sandals to work and often sported a glass-blown peace sign on his neck instead of a tie when he went to work. I can't wear Jesus sandals because of the bike, and I could not find a Triumph Sprint RS in Lucifer Orange (and they have the older 108HP engine rather than the 118HP engine developed with Lotus) but I did find an appropriate peace sign to wear to work. Apparently, the apple does not fall far from the tree :)

Related: Cecil King, the Original KingCaster.

18 May 2013

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Say Witnesses Must Come Forth in Pending Disciplinary Hearing Against Attorneys Burson and McDowell for Foreclosure Acts in Violation of Emergency Rule 14-207.1, Same as Thomas P. Dore!

Remember last week how I showed you where M&T Bank and their lawyer basically hand-picked Judge Mickey Norman to slam a homeowner as Norman completely lied about the reason for Emergency Rule 14-207.1? If you don't well the video is embedded below. He's a real bully and intellectually disingenuous but he can't outsmart me with his lies. Well as a pesky reporter (and former State Attorney and title insurance producer) I am ever so proud to inform you that there's more (including a new video by Monday) coming: 

There's an upcoming trial in Montgomery county (MD) in July for the court to decide whether to disbar or the appropriate level of sanction for John Burson and Matthew McDowell over practices similar to that of T. Dore. Below is the complaint filed by the MD Grievance Commission. MD Griev. Comm's attorney, James Butlok (410-514-7051). Homeowners must demand they participate as witnesses/damaged parties to the practices of Shapiro and Burson and contact whistleblower Jose Portillo and email me at kingjurisdoctor@gmail.com to document the fact that you called. From Paralegal whistleblower Portillo:
The purpose for me reaching out to you is to share upcoming events similar to that of the Thomas Dore case, only this time it deals with attorneys from Shapiro and Burson, another foreclosure attorney in Maryland.  As, you may be already aware (or not), in June 2011, I filed a complaint (attached) with the MD Grievance Commission (MDGC) against attorneys:  William M. Savage, Matthew McDowell and John Burson.  The attorney moving the case is James Botluk (James.Botluk@courts.state.md.us) from MDGC –410-514-7051.

17 May 2013

KingCast says "Happy Birthday Dad!"

Providence to Hartford to Utica to Cleveland..... 653 miles of bug shit  on the Space Alien schnoz of the Triumph Sprint 955i LOL.  

Yesterday was my father's 75th birthday, and as one of my sisters noted on her FB page, you have to give it to him in person because he is no longer of the computer generation. He retired, runs a golf cart around, maintains a driving range and plays basically for free at a great country club. I loved it when he was still working and online though, we used to bust chops all day he's such a smart ass. And as noted, he taught me how to live forever young, regardless of what the bastids throw at ya!

KingCast says Roderick Bremby, CT AG George Jepsen and Federal Court stand corrected in Shafer v. Bremby 12-CV-00039 Title XIX/Eldercare Intervention: A valid CT Power of Attorney = Standing to Appear in Court.

WFSB 3 Connecticut

I-Team investigation reveals ongoing problems..... (link)
Us Dept Of Justice ( [Label IP Address]    12 returning visits

If the U.S. Department of Justice is watching, then why can't my mother and I get any Justice?

Christopher King <kingjurisdoctor@gmail.com>
8:06 AM (0 minutes ago)
to jennifer_sykesHughrobert.kileyArielleDougChristinebweirrawralph,

MarkNancyPhyllismichaelJonathanJennifer, bcc: newcases


This whole case just reeks of injustice. I'll never go violent but I will be the World's biggest pain in the ass until Bremby and the Court do the Right Thing. And it won't be the first time I defeated an entire AG's Office; I did it to my former boss Betty Montgomery and that's a fact:

Even the Ohio Court of Claims had to admit those officers made my client a victim of violent crime.
Best regards,

Shafer v. Bremby 12-CV-0039 Betty J. King Intervention must be granted per Connecticut Gen Stat §1-42 and C...

On top, that's me after hand-delivering my Motion for Rule 60B relief to CT AG George Jepsen. I'm busy this weekend, on vacation and so too is Judge Alvin W. Thompson, who returns on Monday, 20 May 2013 where he will see the indisputable fact that my mother, Betty J. King, is now allowed to proceed as Intervenor in this case because of the valid Connecticut Power of Attorney I filed with the Court yesterday. Video coming Sunday.

It is indisputable that the sole rational for denial of the right to Intervene in the Lower Court was based on the Power of Attorney being from Ohio, and the allegation that a non-licensed attorney may not litigate on behalf of another. The problem with the Court’s analysis was that none of the cases cited dealt with incapacity of the principal. The Court followed Defendants example in citing to Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Coleman, 88 Ohio St. 3d 155 (200), a case in which a man had hung a shingle in a for-profit venture and was offering legal advice to complete strangers who were of sound mind and body, not incapacitated by Alzheimers.

The board found that respondent, who is not an attorney at law, conducted a business under the name "Trouble R Us Consumer Advocates" in Pomeroy, Ohio. During the course of his business, respondent gave legal advice to a resident of Ohio and prepared and filed complaints on her behalf in an Ohio court.

Naturally the Court found that such activity constituted Unauthorized Practice of Law.[1]
Neither Defendants nor the Court provided any Decisional law from Connecticut.
The Law in Connecticut is quite clear however, and it provides:
Gen. Stat. § 1-42 et. seq.

Sec. 1-51. Claims and litigation. In a statutory short form power of attorney, the language conferring general authority with respect to claims and litigation shall be construed to mean that the principal authorizes the agent:

(1) To assert and prosecute before any court, administrative board, department, commissioner or other tribunal any cause of action, claim, counterclaim, offset or defense, which the principal has, or claims to have, against any individual, partnership, association, corporation, limited liability company, government, or other person or instrumentality, including, but not limited to, power to sue for the recovery of land or of any other thing of value, for the recovery of damages sustained by the principal in any manner, for the elimination or modification of tax liability, for an injunction, for specific performance, or for any other relief;
(2) to bring an action of interpleader or other action to determine adverse claims; to intervene or interplead in any action or proceeding, and to act in any litigation as amicus curiae;

There is nothing equivocal about the Plain Language of the Statute when a valid Connecticut Power of Attorney is involved. The Court did not address this argument on prior occasion because it impliedly determined that Ohio Law still governed this matter. Ms. King filed a Motion for Reconsideration to the contrary, however with her new Power of Attorney firmly set in Connecticut she is authorized to have her son stand in her shoes before the Court.
Note further that in Connecticut Christopher King, Esq. is authorized to stand in place of his mother whether or not he is licensed in Connecticut or anywhere else, pursuant to established Connecticut Law, Clark v. Visiting Nurse Serv., 2001 Conn. Super. LEXIS 434 (2001)(Appendix A).
The Connecticut Short Form Power of Attorney Act, General Statutes § 1-42, et seq., confers upon the attorney in fact authorization to engage in litigation on behalf of a principal in the statutory short form power of attorney. General Statutes § 1-43. This means that HN4o to the description of this Headnote."the principal authorizes the agent: (1) To assert . . . before any court . . . any cause of action, claim, counterclaim, offset or defense, which the principal has, or claims to have, against any individual, partnership, association, corporation, limited liability company, government, or other person or instrumentality, including, but not limited to, power to sue . . . for the recovery of damages sustained by the principal in any manner . . ." General Statutes § 1-51.

14 May 2013

KingCast Presents: "Dog Fight!"

A little dog fight at Seven Stars Bakery in Providence, RI. Caught it off the iPhone.

12 May 2013

Razee Motorcycle Center Open House 2013 + New Pirelli Angel GT Install.

A beautiful rainy day at Razee Motorcycle Center for their 2013 Open House. They ordered a new Pirelli Angel GT for my Triumph Sprint RS and installed the rear yesterday. I'll pick up the front next week. Seems like a really nice tyre, and probably twice the mileage of my Dunlop Q2's.

11 May 2013

KingCast Says "Happy Mother's Day Mom!"

Thank you for being the Best Momma! 

Even though my sister and I have become the parents.

Even though I've lost my favorite intellectual sparring partner.

Even though you barely remember who I am.

And even though Judge Alvin W. Thompson does not care about you and completely gnored relevant law on the Title XIX/Medicaid lawsuit in Shafer v. Bremby, and even though Connecticut AG George Jepsen is a proved liar and Judge Thompson refuses to rule on our Rule 11 Motion for Sanctions. I've got something for their asses, and I am sure you would like it if only you knew. I will fix their wagons Real Good. See you tomorrow Honey.

-Your Son.

The law couldn't be any clearer, the fact that the POA was initially filed in Ohio does not divest Connecticut Courts of Jurisdiction so I am overnighting the Motion for Reconsideration and for Clarification on the Rule 11 Sanctions that the Court has not ruled on, and an Interlocutory Appeal is coming next.