OK so here's an update to the latest bullshit from YouTube: Just because someone appears in a YouTube video who doesn't want to be in it, they can make YouTube strike your video.... which is complete and utter bullshit, particularly when you are covering a public court event, right. So what I did was, I went into the video and made some gross edits that addressed their purported concerns, and put it right back up there.
Keep in mind that even though I am a YouTube partner there have been times when I could not post videos from my primary KingCast65 or Christopher King account, for no reason whatsoever.... in addition to the Supertramp fiasco (see more at Pink Floyd Network) in which I was twice cleared by the record company but still got my videos yanked from YouTube. The only reason I changed the video is that I just don't have time to litigate this shit but they are completely in violation of the Hudgens/Pruneyard analysis and I may one day come back and sue them, but right now I am too busy for their little games.
YouTube actually removed the original video so I made a new one.
Here is your back story. Don't worry there will be litigation and it will be restored, and there will be more videos on this very subject. To date I have had now two video taken down out of nearly 700 posted. This is complete and absolute bullshit. Here is one woman's story about how she won.
YouTube has a habit of making it impossible to reply to them when someone issues a privacy complaint so your video gets a strike and a take down even though the person who issued the complaint in this case clearly defamed the tenant who is being unlawfully evicted. They can go to hell because I wrote their attorneys before on another censorship issue and I am putting this video right back up and going right back at them, and I will indeed sue them over this nonsense and sent them a Hudgens warning before:
The subject of this video concerns a PUBLIC COURT CASE with public allegations..... meanwhile the complaining party uttered comments on the video that accused the tenant of being promiscuous and a drunkard and using public money to buy booze and illicit drugs. Eventually there will be a lawsuit over this and YouTube had goddamn better be ready to turn over the original files or there will be some heat like they can't believe because I won't stand for this bullshit.
Uh-oh.... a channel closed down.....somebody running scared after Defaming Ms. Surface:
Dear YouTube Staff Attorneys and Reviewing Support Staff:
The movie speaks for itself.
Note: The City of Revere is to blame. She contacted housing inspectional services and they didn't do anything. This is their history, Google Clifford Pisano + Revere 525 Beach Street and CERCLA + EPA. Councilor Ira Novoselsky might as well be on the take, that's why he shoved my camera and yes man Miles Kennedy and the Mayor's Office called the police on me. These people are a joke, or a crying shame. That's all right boys, I've got your number, but good.
Ms. Surface has her own YouTube page with a movie that I re-shot and added for segments of today's fiasco at Chelsea District Court. Basically the landlord is up shit creek without a paddle, the place is foul and in desperate need of repair but the corrupt City of Revere lets it all slide. I don't, nor do you.... that's why you're watching it all go down right here at KingCast.net and Chris King's First Amendment Page!