30 March 2013

KingCast Sees U.S. Court of Appeals Reading up on Hon Magistrate Landya B. McCafferty as Time Draws Near for Oral Argument in KingCast v. Kelly Ayotte, NH GOP & Nashua PD, First Circuit Ct. App. 12-1891.


Note: It could be the DIstrict Court but I doubt it. Last week we had the Executive Office of the United States reading up so there's nothing shocking about this development. Stay tuned to see what happens to my request for Oral argument on the KingCast v. Kelly Ayotte Free Press/First Amendment Appeal..... you know the case where Magistrate McCafferty slammed me at the TRO argument without disclosing that she and Kelly both used to work underneath BOTH of my opposing counsel, Jack Middleton and Jennifer Parent. 

I'm not stupid.... a little slow on uptake at times, perhaps but I figured it out. Thing is, any first year lawyer will tell you (and my Fed lit experience as Assistant AG and in private practice reminds me) I never should have had to ask. Kelly and her crew basically hand-picked a Judge. Here is my Appellate Brief in 12-1891 and here is my Reply Brief. And by the way, they are not just reading a little bit... they are reading.... a LOT.  Look below the fold to see what they are reading and what pictures they are reviewing: Cerfnet (199.107.16.120) [Label IP Address]    1 returning visit


Cerfnet (199.107.16.120) [Label IP Address]    1 returning visit
United States FlagBoston, Massachusetts, United States    
30 Mar15:30:31
30 Mar15:32:04
30 Mar15:32:57
30 Mar15:34:08
30 Mar15:34:40
30 Mar15:34:55
30 Mar15:35:00
30 Mar15:36:08
30 Mar15:36:10
30 Mar15:37:13
30 Mar15:37:18
30 Mar15:37:34
30 Mar15:37:36
30 Mar15:37:58
30 Mar15:38:01
30 Mar15:38:05
30 Mar15:38:07
30 Mar15:38:12
30 Mar15:38:13
30 Mar15:38:15
30 Mar15:38:52
30 Mar15:39:03
30 Mar15:39:06
30 Mar15:39:25
30 Mar15:41:41
30 Mar15:42:27
30 Mar15:43:03
30 Mar15:54:52
30 Mar16:05:48
30 Mar16:44:42
30 Mar16:46:40

1 comment:

Christopher King said...

Hi Christopher

Thanks for the info, very helpful.

Just in case you did not know, McCaferty granted the Madison defendants summary judgment, claiming I was a limited public figure for sending a letter to the newspaper on totally different issues. Also, she deprived me the opportunity to show defendants Malice intent, and or reckless disregard for the falsity of their defamatory broadcasts.

It was just another political favor by McCafferty. Now we shall see how the 1st circuit handles it.
Also McCafferty allowed attorney Brian Cullen to falsify privilege logs to conceal incriminating evidence and thwart the courts camera review order.

Hows that for a corrupt court system, especially after Cullen was caught red handed. NH Fed. Docket no. 10-cv-393-LM See also (Ct order no. 94); (Ct. doc. no.143); and (Ct. doc. no. 162).
Thanks
Sam Bourne