Today's feature presentation is loading up now so get your popcorn and truffle butter ready. Here is your back story with prior videos including testimony to the NH Committee on Redress and Grievances on mortgage foreclosure fraud, DCYF and NH Family Court abuse and more. To those of you I didn't have time to include in this short video you may want to call in to Kevin Avard's show in the second week of January, stay tuned.
Meantime I suggest you read NH Const. Article § 32. [Art.] 32. [Rights of Assembly, Instruction, and Petition.]
The people have a right, in an orderly and peaceable manner, to assemble and consult upon the common good, give instructions to their representatives, and to request of the legislative body, by way of petition or remonstrance, redress of the wrongs done them, and of the grievances they suffer.
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 6:18 PM, David johnson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
These videos clearly demonstrate that this Magistrate, BAR Attorney M. Wageling, is operating routine violations of trust law. The fact that she does so with such regularity and impunity requires some inquiry to see what the accepted procedure is in New Hampshire. It appears as if those who oppose the redress of grievances process in the General Court stand as a boundary between the people and law. This is simply not going to happen.
The "mortgage" fraud occurring with this Magistrate has reached the point of null and void for her rulings. She is part one of the fraud and felony. The next part is the recent overthrow of the New Hampshire Constitution by the rogue faction within the House Committee on Rules. Almost all of the Petitions under Articles 31 & 32 are against a legislative process to have the Circuit Court Family Division operate as an equity court, which does not have rules, see Family Division Rule 1.2, and many abuses of Article 73-a. Combined abuses result in routine violations of law. Both together are not lawful. The existence of the framework is one aspect of the unrest. The one in play is usually the abusive and unlawful practice of this scenario as an excuse to run government outside the law. This is simply not allowed under constitutional law.
The videos provided by Chris King create a very unique and urgent requirement. The Wageling crimes implicate corruption in the rules of the NHSJC. I'm affected by the fact that the most pressing issue at hand is for those testifying for the House Committee, to re-present the audio and video content accompanied with affidavits from those present and those making statements. These videos are indicative of crime and treason. One cannot defend such. This is a sign that New Hampshire is run by that which is not constitutional law.
The Democrats are damaging their credibility by siding with the courts. That hurts their own families and constituents. Worse yet, the Democrats have chosen to aid the side of treason. They are throwing the Constitution out as if they are allowed. This is not allowed.
I did my tour of duty in New Hampshire as NAACP Legal Chair and Citizen-at-Large, winning several First Amendment battles and earning a Mayoral Commendation from the longest-sitting member of the Governor's Executive Council. I will say this: So much of what I learned in law school is complete hogwash when it comes to how the courts and government really operate and I am not afraid to publicly say it. The amount of lies, deceit and outright corruption on the mortgage side and in family courts is enough to make you sick. And who is behind this nonsense? Democrat Teri Norelli, whom I sued [snip] (that's how they do it at Daily Kos, right)....
.....a few years back to uncover information about how North Country's Martha McLeod tried to railroad HB 1428 "Bruce McKay Highway" through without telling anyone. We prevailed again against SB 154, all of which is linked herein.
Speaker Norelli's name appears in many of my journal entries for her involvement with Martha McLeod as the Franconia townsfolk and I prevailed in the House and in the Senate to slam Bruce McKay Highway into oblivion. Bruce McKay was a bad cop, the town knew about it way back in 1997 and he died violating policy. The First Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the Liko Kenney Estate Appeal while ignoring many salient issues but that is what happens when you kill a cop, regardless of how scared you were. I love the part of the Decision when it goes to describe how McKay basically issued a love tap to Liko Kenney before emptying an entire can of OC Spray to him without warning or directive. Watch a movie and read what really happened below the fold, in Kelly Ayotte's own investigative file. This is why the NH establishment hates me with a passion. As for me, I don't hate any of them, I just wish they would start telling the Truth once in a while.
The grey car was not going fast. I thought [McKay] was trying to get around it [for something else]. He made several movements (her daughter called it a "10-point turn" in her interview) to come nose to nose now facing north.... [McKay] pushed him and kept pushing him down (into the gravel area) dirt flew back the police car pushed him so strongly and just kept pushing and pushing and pushing until the grey car was beyond my view."Related:
Redress & Grievances hears complaints on Mortgage Foreclosure.
Redress & Grievances hears complaints on DCYF and Family Courts.
More on this later and a Motion to Reconsider may be planned. It is hard to get Justice anymore in America and especially in New Hampshire where the Courts 99% of the time agree with Law Enforcement, big business and banks. What is especially troubling in this instance is that Caleb Macaulay is not emotionally in a position at this point to issue his Affidavit as to McKay's true actions that day are not admissible. Even at that, however, retired Franconia Officer Bradford Whipple's Affidavit was enough to survive Summary Judgment. See also this journal entry for a summation of the lies and coverup in this case and this journal entry for the lies and coverup about Greg Floyd that disappeared from the Internet until I replaced them.
The Decision disregards the manner in which the OC Spray was deployed and downplays the Tahoe bashing as well, when in point of fact the seven (7) protocols that Bruce McKay clearly violated may indeed provided enough basis for a Jury to assess liability for Constitutional violations. The specific protocol says McKay was never to overtake or to ram a car and that if the identity of the suspect was known he was supposed to let him go. McKay overtook, rammed the car back out of sight and did not let him go yet he sure as hell knew his identity. The Court did not address those facts and simply usurped the function of the Jury, which is to decide whether or not those actions rise to the level of a Constitutional violation.
Instead the Court just said that those actions were permissible (which they clearly WERE NOT permissible) but that is once again his opinion, which does not comport with the neighbor's opinion when they described the situation in Kelly Ayotte's own so-called "Official Report." Read it right here in a 29 June 2007 Journal Entry entitled: "KingCast and community members say Bruce McKay was a bully; Liko Kenney died 800 feet from his home at Tamarack Tennis Camp."
The grey car was not going fast. I thought [McKay] was trying to get around it [for something else]. He made several movements (her daughter called it a "10-point turn" in her interview) to come nose to nose now facing north.... [McKay] pushed him and kept pushing him down (into the gravel area) dirt flew back the police car pushed him so strongly and just kept pushing and pushing and pushing until the grey car was beyond my view."Court a reasonable Juror find that McKay doing all of this -- allegedly over an expired inspections sticker but more accurately out of a history of demonstrated contempt for Mill/Kenney -- rises to the level of a Constitutional deprivation? Of course. But we might not get to find out because the Court overstepped its bounds. Not only that, the Court wrote that it was unclear what further discovery would reveal as it slammed the hearsay statements presented by the investigator. Well wait a minute: Perhaps further discovery would give Mr. Kenney's lawyers time to interview more witnesses to what they have seen McKay do and their attempts to file complaints about him that went ignored, which is the whole point in a custom and practice Monell/42 U.S.C. §1983 lawsuit in the first place.
The State Law claims including wrongful death may be tried in State Court.