19 Dec. 2012 global email, I have the case and will post it later:
Everything is going to hit the fan now with the companion case of Briggs v. Bremby 12-CV-00324 denying Bremby's Motion to Dismiss in the Food Stamp issue.. Don't say I didn't tell you so. Well you can say anything you want to, I don't care. The Truth is all on my side, and on the side of other innocent victims of the lies and deceit set forth by Commissioner Bremby and his lawyers.
This is a shame because as I told his lawyers before, I was inclined to be sympathetic to him because I feel what happened to him in Kansas was not right, as you can see by my stance with U.S. Senator Kelly Ayotte (read the masthead carefully).http://kellyayottesenate.blogspot.com/
But in this case, involving my mother, he is full of shit and I will not back down from him or anyone else, watching my mother die of Alzheimers while Bremby and his lawyers lie about it churns my stomach all day 24/7.
Christopher King, J.D.
http://KingCast.net -- Reel News for Real People
http://MortgageMovies.blogspot.com -- Documenting Deceit
I am waiting for my comment to post in the Connecticut Mirror story about the 125 boxes with processing problems. It's like an iceberg tip, right. I emailed Reporter Arielle Lavin Becker about this. I sincerely hope that the paper does not censor my comments. Censorship is Un-American. Read my comment in the comments section.
It gets worse: In the Spirit of Due Diligence that Defendant lacks, Intervenor searched her own emails to discover that Attorney Hugh Barber is implicated as well, because she told him back on 26 September 2012 that the materials she was submitting.... had already been submitted.
"I owe one more document from GE. It is the same life insurance form I forwarded last year it should be ready by tomorrow. SSN.... let me know if you need more."Ms. King hereby supplements the record. The exchanges with Attorney Barber were polite and cordial. Intervenor's position will be vindicated.
I am going to visit this matter on the Connecticut Bar Association, which will probably pass the buck and say "Oh, it's pending litigation, we can't address that." Oh yah well I'll just take it to the streets then dammit. Watch for a dedicated web page for Roderick Bremby and Attorney Jennifer Callahan where others can write in with their horror stories. Meanwhile I shall wait for the Court to rule on the Motion to Intervene, the Motion to Strike the Affidavit (view those here, a couple thousand folks already have) and this Motion for Sanctions. If you have any questions just go straight to Fed R. Evid 602.
Betty J King Rule 11