16 July 2011

Huge Car Crash in Downtown Nashua, cops threaten reporter + new Mike Gannon police abuse statements.

The 1989 pic is not directly related, but you know, nothing like a contemporary Rockwell, kids in the street, puppies.... you know The Deal and The Deal is Real........... I wish I had my real camera with me today but whatever.... the old pic was shot with a Nikon 4004s or 8008 one of those pups. I'm a Canon guy now though, better video capacities.

So once again I just went for a ride to Nashua on the (now) trusty Triumph (a/k/a "Bessie" or "Christine" depending on her mood and dodgy British electrics).... and look what I saw:

As to the crash, I hope there was no fatality involved but I wouldn't know because the firefighter and cop were being such schmucks about it. I've never had that happen before and I shoot lots of fire and accident scenes. Here's one from "The Only Honorable Profession" entry, and here's another, with video of firefighters asking me what my website is!!!
So anyway, I found out that some liar from Peddler's Daughter is going to testify that Mike Gannon was swearing at LE Detectives who are soon to be subject to a Bivens action -- well I have their names now so will publish soon, not a true Bivens action then but whatever, the key is, as I said in the FBI First Amendment/Free Press journal entry with video, I don't give a damn what this guy says, it's all about the video that Mike Gannon was shooting when the cops got upset and confiscated his property. It is exculpatory evidence that must be turned over to him for viewing under LE supervision. I will be there to video it myself as I did in the Franconia Shooting Tragedy with Liko Kenney, Bruce McKay and Greg Floyd and Kelly Ayotte coverup. More on my observations about that video when the Hollywood movie of Casey Sherman's novel "Bad Blood: Freedom and Death in the White Mountains" debuts. That's Casey and Yours Truly on location, where I filmed all of my "Bowfinger/Bad Blood" series. Yep.

But I digress: As noted in the single link, supra, Nashua LE should have turned over the 2006 videos as well, and they have no expectation of privacy in the current case, in which Mr. Gannon and Pamela Reynolds were beat down and maced for no lawful reason. 

Lastly, as the link notes, the Defendants in KingCast v. Kelly Ayotte, NH GOP and Nashua PD NH Dist 2010-CV-501 want to get away from the demonstrated abuse of people with cameras but once again they and Kelly Ayotte's Veteran's Chair Stephen Monier lie and continue to trash talk me even as I am already on the goddamn SIDEWALK -- and yes it is all ON VIDEO. 

So as the link addresses, I can -- and will -- keep on suing Nashua PD every time they unlawfully chill Protected First Amendment Activity whether or not Judge Paul Barbadoro allows me to file the Third Amended Complaint. If I am complying with your Orders, STFU and let me do my job, simple. The beatings will continue until the morale improves.

SCOTUS Justice Elena Kagan -- whom Kelly Ayotte said was "not qualified to sit on the bench" is waiting to review all of this, and I am more than proud to put it right on her plate.... or on the bench as the case may be.

I'm on this like a hawk.
New window
Print all
Collapse all

Final RSA 91-A warning + Nashua Cops harass reporter at car crash scene + more lies about Mike Gannon.

Christopher King to EmilyHeilMarta.Modiglia.ryanvbarrysberwickmichael.delaneymike.delaneyreporterRipholdenHousePublicWor.david.cotephil.prestonfranpotterrobert.thompsonnancy_elliottsilvawards589jeffbrownenhrick.watrouswill.smithgrichardsonnixonraichelawrh.roweAnn.Ricepmceacherninfo
show details 9:25 AM (0 minutes ago)

You better have a talk with some of your boys in blue unless you want to keep getting billable hours. Every time they continue to bark orders at me when I have already complied there will be some sort of legal action. I won't stand for this nonsense as it is highly offensive -- not to mention the fact that it hampers legitimate news gathering.

And oh, the State is going to have some tool from Peddler's Daughter testify now.... no need for that just have your clients cough up the video from Mr. Gannon's phone. But of course NH will use a Perjurer anytime they can, right. Just ask Charles Gleen, ahem.

Lastly, I sent you an RSA 91A warning letter on 11 July, 2011. It is now 17 July 2011 -- am I to infer that your client has no position on the matter because the Statutory timeframe in which to respond has passed. I provided you relevant case law in Anthony Graber's directly related case and I asked for the video from the Nashua Police booth.

In Anthony Graber’s case the Court opined:

 "Those of us who are public officials and are entrusted with the power of the state are ultimately accountable to the public. When we exercise that power in public fora, we should not expect our actions to be shielded from public observation. 'Sed quis custodiet ipsos cutodes' ("Who watches the watchmen?”)." Read the Decision for yourself because I’m going to cite to it when I sue:

Christopher King, J.D.
http://KingCast.net -- Reel News for Real People
http://MortgageMovies.blogspot.com -- Documenting Deceit

Subject: RE: Final RSA 91-A warning + Nashua Cops harass reporter at car crash scene + more lies about Mike Gannon.


As you know, on July 11 I responded to your July 10 request for video of the Michael Gannon arrest, observing that the matter is an ongoing investigation and noting that, as you are not licensed in NH and appear to have had you license suspended in Ohio, I do not believe that you are representing Mr. Gannon in a legal capacity here.  A copy of that response is below.  If I have misunderstood the status of your license to practice law please let me know. 

The City will review your July 11 request to see if it falls within the same investigatory concern.  It will take 30 days to complete that review.  I will be in touch with you then on this matter.


I have reviewed your July 5, 2011 request pursuant to RSA 91-A for the “unlawfully confiscated porch tapes from the Mike Gannon residence.”  Based on your other correspondence, I assume that you mean to refer to audio/video recorded by Mr. Gannon and obtained by the police in June, 2006.  Please be advised that we cannot produce these tapes to you.  The tapes do not fall within the definition of public records under the statute.  Even were they to be considered as such, they would be exempt from disclosure underLodge v. Knowlton, 118 N.H. 574 (1978), as their release would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy of not only Mr. Gannon, who you represent has consented to their release, but the officers recorded on the video, who have not provided you such consent.  In addition, the material recorded concerns an investigation into juvenile criminal investigations, and hence is confidential.  Finally, RSA 570-A:2 prohibits the disclosure of recordings made in violation of the statute.
I have also reviewed your further requests pursuant to RSA 91-A made today for “the July 1, 2011 video shot by Mr. Gannon.”  This video will likewise not be disclosed to you for the reasons set forth above concerning the 2006 video, excepting the juvenile confidentiality.  Moreover, there is a pending investigation and prosecution as to which the referenced video is evidence, and which could be compromised by the release of this evidence to you at this time.  I trust that as you are not licensed in New Hampshire and I believe are suspended in Ohio, you do not actually represent Mr. Gannon in either his criminal defense or in any other capacity, and I am not prosecuting that matter.  Nevertheless, I am confident that Mr. Gannon or his counsel will seek discovery of the video in the context of the criminal case, and leave it to the prosecutor and criminal judge to determine how to address such requests in the course of that action.
Brian J.S. Cullen, Esq.
CullenCollimore pllc
10 East Pearl Street
Nashua, NH 03060

Christopher King to BrianEmilyHeilMarta.Modiglia.ryanvbarrysberwickmichael.delaneymike.delaneyreporterRipholdenHousePublicWor.david.cotephil.prestonfranpotterrobert.thompsonnancy_elliottsilvawards589jeffbrownenhrick.watrouswill.smithgrichardsonnixonraichelawrh.roweAnn.Ricepmceachern
show details 9:56 AM (1 minute ago)
I'm not sorry that Brian hit the respond all button because I want everyone to see how our government works... it's your tax dollars, folks.


1. I take it your client's final answer on the 2006 porch tapes is basically "sue us and we will see what happens."

2. As to the final answer on the 2011 arrest video beloning from Mr. Gannon that is exculpatory evidence:

Whether or not I am licensed to practice law doesn't have squat to do with it. What matters is that if Mr. Gannon decides to review that video he is entitled to do it and he is entitled to have the person of his choice to cut the video for him, which is precisely what I did in the Franconia matter although yes as you recall Kelly conducted her Mickey Mouse sham "investigation" of that in one day the fact still remains that newspapers all over the world gain access to video while there is a case in progress. You and your client will see that fact with brilliant alacrity when I file suit. And lastly, your client's purported concern over the safety and preservation of the video is as Judge Barbadoro would say "entirely without merit." I'm not even going to touch the device, simply record from it with my camera.

3. As to the final answer on the 2011 arrest video beloning from the police station that is exculpatory evidence:

Same item #2, supra. and remember whether or not your client gets away with hiding any of these videos or tapes in the short run, I'm still going to be there in the long run to publish the Truth. Heck if your client is telling the Truth they really won't have any problem releasing the material now, LE does this all the time mate.

See you soon.
- Show quoted text -

1 comment:

Christopher King said...

PS: My old boss, Ohio Civil Rights lawyer Terry Gilbert had a 4DSC Maxima, I loved those cars with the 5-speed manual and 190hp Six, but the Bimmer 6 is just oh so much sweeter so I always roll BMW or SAAB, but there too many SAAB stories to make me buy another one LOL.

But the Classic 900T with a Stage One kit would run like something fierce in chilly weather especially. And the whistle of the Turbo is simply intoxicating....

Whenever I see one of those era Maximas though I'm always thinking "what a great winter car....."

Which you don't need in Boston, really. Just ride the T.