23 December 2010

KingCast laughs as Wikipedia says the Nashua Telegraph is not a good enough secondary source for Kelly Ayotte information, but the Littleton Courier is.


I'm speechless. These guys are ridiculous. They show up and trash talk me, but I'll bet you a scant few of them has ever worked for a large daily newspaper or edited a large weekly newspaper. And who the hell is this person in Manchester NH who is apparently on the Wiki Board of review? Do they have a conflict of interest? Inquiring minds want to know but the bullshit is going to stop. Other people will submit the same information and then let's see what happens. They will probably lock the forum; I'm making a YouTube video about this, so there you go. Stand by your position if that's how you're going to be, guys.

So the Nashua Telegraph isn't good enough for you? I will notify their staff immediately. But you said in another post that the Littleton Courier was good enough and the Telegraph dwarfs the Courier. And you expect the Union Leader and WMUR to run stories about this lawsuit? Please. Nor have they run any coverage of Liko Kenney's lawsuit. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan's staff is following my Tweets, unsolicited. But of course that means nothing to you either. DId the Mayor of Nashua ask what major press was covering my efforts before he and the Aldermanic Chamber presented me with a Mayoral Commendation, the closest thing Nashua has to a key to the City? Hell no. http://i45.tinypic.com/11qnzfs.jpg
So in the end, there you are waiting for the mainstream press to legitimize a story about alternative press being denied equal access. Wow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Free Press KingCast (talk • contribs) 18:57, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Ah, here we come to the problem. You ask above "You don't think it's newsworthy that the GOP thinks it can pick and choose what reporters to allow" -- it may very well be newsworthy, but we're not writing a newspaper, we're writing an encyclopedia, which has a whole different set of criteria for inclusion. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:10, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
It is newsworthy because it is the position of Kelly Ayotte, as Friends of Kelly Ayotte is a named Defendant, DUH. Wiki is here to note her positions on major issues, and the Free Press is a major issue the last time I checked, or are you telling me otherwise my friend? Stop the nonsense. http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2010/12/kingcast-laughs-as-wikipedia-says.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Free Press KingCast (talk • contribs) 19:20, 23 December 2010 (UTC)


5 comments:

Christopher King said...

Bingo! They locked the comments after trying to pretend that Kelly Ayotte has no knowledge of the lawsuit.

They are a bunch of douchebags anyway, here comes the YouTube video, hahahaaaa...

-The KingCaster.

Christopher King said...

Wiki: Hey King go get a newspaper account.

KingCast: OK here's the Nashua Telegraph, Wiki says it's the second-largest paper in NH (27,000 daily, and 34,000 on Sunday)

Wiki: Hey King you misquoted the account.

KingCast: OK, here's direct quotes showing that I spoke to Kelly Ayotte and the Police had me escorted out after she refused to acknowledge my presence.

Wiki: Hey King that's not good enough either, you have no proof she knew about the litigation.

KingCast: You guys are scum

Christopher King said...

Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales on internet censorship:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0suY1pMJN08

Yah, right, just a bunch of sanctimonious bullshit, if he really means it he will publish the fact that a U.S. Senator believes she can pick and choose the media covering her publicly-advertised campaign events that occur on commercial property subject to State licensing and permitting.

If so, good on him for correcting the work of a few mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging jackass editors.

If not, then we know he's full of shit.

Time will tell, won't it.

Especially because others will be posting the same information soon.

-The KingCaster.

Christopher King said...

@thekohser Very interesting stuff here, I am posting now on the MyWikiBiz board and will post everywhere I can find because they are full of shit, I love this quote from MyWikiBiz:

no accountability -- they don't reveal their real names, locations, and potential conflicts of interest -- even though they will not hesitate, through "complex investigations", to "out" the real names, locations, and perceived conflicts of interest of other, non-administrative editors....

Exactly right, scumbags.

Christopher King said...

I see you are looking in on Christmas Day, and you are looking at all the places I've posted the video.

Fairpoint Communications (71.168.100.162) [Label IP Address]

7 visits starting at:
25th December 2010 06:18:23

You locked me out, you're sure of your position, why bother coming back to me?

Because you know you're a fokker that's why.

And I relish the opportunity to tell more people all about you and your bullshit, you nameless coward.

-The KingCaster.