02 October 2010

KingCast Mexican Standoff: GOP, John McCain, Kelly Ayotte tell Attorney William Chapman, KingCast and the First Amendment to go to Hell.

Movie coming by 5:30, links coming later or tomorrow.

So funny the final thumbnail for the movie you will see it change tonight, is the Nashua Telegraph's Grant Morris recording me while I'm recording me recording him.... or is it vice versa.... Preamble for the uneducated folks who wondered why I asked about Kelly Ayotte supporting Unconstitutional DNA reporting for all NH youth charged with any crimes...... That's Unconstitutional folks, and a Momma Grizzly shouldn't be espousing policies against children that violate the Constitution.  Judge David LeFrancois ruled as much a long time before Kelly was forced to abandon this policy after heat was applied from a certain young man's father (I broke the story here, with him) and the ACLU was applied. That goes hand-in-hand with all of her other malfeasance duly noted, and her flip flops on Immigration as noted by Debbie Schlussel and me, and John McCain's history of flip-flips and skeletons in his closet, including Immigration, Guantanimo Bay, Roe v. Wade and marital flip-flops, I wonder if he helped Cindy smuggle contraband while he was a U.S. Senator?


Be that as it may, as noted in this post:

Noted New Hampshire First Amendment and Media Law Attorney William L. Chapman categorically stated:
Quoting another court decision, the justices noted in the ruling, “Freedom of the press is a fundamental personal right which is not confined to newspapers and periodicals. ... The press in its historic connotation comprehends every sort of publication which affords a vehicle of information and opinion.
“The informative function asserted by representatives of the organized press ... is also performed by lecturers, political pollsters, novelists, academic researchers, and dramatists. Almost any author may quite accurately assert that he is contributing to the flow of information to the public...”
That ruling suggests that opinioned bloggers are also journalists, Chapman said.
“I can think of no case where a blogger would be treated differently (than a print journalist under the law),” Chapman said.

WHEREFORE: Plaintiff is a former resident of New Hampshire with a background in Communications. He has worked as a reporter for the Indianapolis Star, as an Editor with the Ohio Call & Post, and holds a Nashua Mayoral Certificate for First Amendment activity in the Public Interest. He has also instigated a First Amendment Policy change at the Nashua School Board, in which the Board changed a restrictive speech policy after Plaintiff threatened to sue in 2007.

Defendants are Kelly Ayotte, the New Hampshire and Nashua GOP, who have consistently threatened Plaintiff with arrest at three (3) distinct functions that were openly advertised to the general public and to the media.

First, Defendant Ayotte threatened Plaintiff's arrest at a Manchester, NH function that was advertised on Facebook, even after Plaintiff offered to pay money to attend when he was excluded as a media member.

Second, Defendant Ayotte and/or the all Defendants conspired to threaten Plaintiff's arrest at the Joe Arpaio rally, in which Plaintiff politely asked Sheriff Arpaio if he was aware that Kelly Ayotte said the 2005 Monadnock Valley Immigration crackdown was Unconstitutional.

Third, as seen today Defendant Ayotte did it again, proving she has a vendetta against Plaintiff and Freedom of the Press, and it is crucial because she -- with substantial backing from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and shady companies like Taxmasters (under suit by Texas AG for False and Deceptive Consumer Practices) will probably be elected for U.S. Senate over Paul Hodes because of current National cyclical trends and Hodes' milquetoast campaign.....

Media other than Plaintiff were welcomed or present at all three events.

.....So the Mexican Standoff ensues. Attorney Chapman has made his position known. The ACLU position should mirror his position. Therefore I would expect that the ACLU -- which is known for defending the Free Speech and Press Rights of All persons including white supremacists -- will be contacting me to proceed with litigation forthwith.

Whether you like me, love me, hate me or anything in between, litigation is now absolutely necessary to preserve the Freedoms and Inalienable Rights enumerated in the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

The more you act like an unprofessional disruptive asshole the more you will be thrown out of events......get used to it!

Christopher King said...

Should the ACLU defend free speech rights of white supremacists?
PRO (yes)

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in its Oct. 31, 2005 paper titled "Freedom of Expression" stated:

"The ACLU has often been at the center of controversy for defending the free speech rights of groups that spew hate, such as the Ku Klux Klan and the Nazis. But if only popular ideas were protected, we wouldn't need a First Amendment. History teaches that the first target of government repression is never the last. If we do not come to the defense of the free speech rights of the most unpopular among us, even if their views are antithetical to the very freedom the First Amendment stands for, then no one's liberty will be secure. In that sense, all First Amendment rights are 'indivisible.'"

Oct. 31, 2005 - American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)

**********

If they can defend and protect white supremacists, I'm certain they look forward to protecting me, the victim of Kelly Ayotte's and Martin J. Dunn's misguided and Unconstitutional attempted prosecution toward me when I was NAACP Legal Chair in Southern NH.

There is a pattern here, and Kelly Ayotte clearly has a vendetta against me, all the while claiming I have one against her. Hell, I just want to ask her a couple of questions, and that's something that a damn U.S. Senator has to get used to, sorry.

-The KingCaster.

Anonymous said...

Self professed protector of the freedom of speech yet you refuse to post a comment that dares to contradict you. Then you post in topix with your anonymous user names with a proxy server. You are a living breathing example of hypocrisy at it's finest.
You can't handle the truth about who you really are....

Anonymous said...

The only vendetta is the one you have against anyone who dares to question your unethical actions.

Get used to the fact that just because you ask someone a question doesn't mean they have to answer you. Especially when you harass them with tehs ame questions over and over, MOVE ON with your life.

You don't answer questions that anyone asks you, especially ones when you are asked for an honest answer.

You aren't honest with yourself let alone anyone else.

Christopher King is Christopher King's worst enemy until you accept that you will never change.

Christopher King said...

Someone suggested to me yesterday that the real Mexican Standoff is between the ACLU and me, and whether they will Do the Right Thing and sue for Injunctive Relief and Damages.

I told them that I have no doubts that the ACLU will Do the Right Thing and sue for Injunctive Relief and Damages.

The Law is clear,

http://www.courts.state.nh.us/supreme/opinions/2010/2010041mortg.pdf

http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/news/728051-196/court-backs-website-on-free-speech.html

...especially given that I have experience with a large daily and medium-sized weekly newspapers, in addition to winning First Amendment Criminal Defense cases as an attorney.

-The KingCaster.

Christopher King said...

I never use a proxy server on Topix, you idiot, better stop smoking that sherm that Kelly Ayotte's buddy Greg Floyd sold you back in the day, when he was a younger multiple felon. Not that she divulged any of that to the American Public when she was busy covering up his murder of Liko Kenney, soon to be seen on a Major Hollywood Screen, ahem.

As for the GOP not answering my question, any fascist politician is allowed to ignore a question, but they are not allowed to refuse you access.

I always post your dumb-assed comments, they're a hoot to read.

You will see in the long run that I am correct here, just as with most of my First Amendment issues, Mr. Bill Christy, why don't you call me a nigger and motherfucker again?

(Newbies YouTube search for "Bill Christy Project + Nigger.")

Then run a search on this blog for "Try Gregory Floyd for Murder" and see whatcha' get.

This guys a a cheeze whiz.

-The KingCaster.

PS: You don't like what I do, take it up with Bernie Streeter, he has a somewhat different opinion, and he's a Republican.

Christopher King said...

PS: You can't show where I disrupted anything.

Once again:

“The informative function asserted by representatives of the organized press ... is also performed by lecturers, political pollsters, novelists, academic researchers, and dramatists. Almost any author may quite accurately assert that he is contributing to the flow of information to the public...”

That ruling suggests that opinioned bloggers are also journalists, Chapman said.

“I can think of no case where a blogger would be treated differently (than a print journalist under the law),” Chapman said.

Your theories are about to Implode/Explode, Sir.

http://www.courts.state.nh.us/supreme/opinions/2010/2010041mortg.pdf

BTW you got a spare $110M laying around to replace the financial crater that Kelly created with her loss in the Tuttle/JUA case?

Tool.

Christopher King said...

Damn Bill, 42 visits to my blog since 1 October, I thought you said my days were numbered.... and you didn't care about me.

Specifically, you wrote:

"Your days are numbered little man you will be real surprised when you find out who Quiet Man really is and they have long history with your antics and have you pegged for what you are...."

What is that Bill, a nigger and a motherfucker?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-mY_xCskXs

And that's your voice pal don't try to lie about it, i've got the phone records you stupid jackass.

Anonymous said...

When you say you are a professional journalist can you say it with a straight face?

Christopher King said...

You betcha', been there done that and still doing it.

What are your journalist achievements?

When you say you have an ounce of Common Sense, can you say THAT with a straight face?

Tool.

Christopher King said...

Again, closed caption for the intellect-impaired, what I told yer buddy Billy Boy:

Blah blah blah blah blah..... look at yer panties all in a bunch, Mr. Billy Boy.

What's my First Amendment record like in Nashua?
1. School Board -- threatened to sue, policy changed, won it.

2. Kelly Ayotte Unauthorized Practice of Law as NAACP Legal Chair for using Constitutionally-protected First Amendment Rights for Willie Toney -- Dismissed, won it.

3. State v. King, Attempted Felony Extortion for same use of First Amendment Rights, Nol-Prossed (Dismissed per Union Leader, won it.

4. First Amendment Commendation from Nashua Mayor Streeter, won it.

And this letter is brilliant Bill because I circulated it to the Town and the paper has made Attorney Bennett aware of it, so now Attorney Bennett is inspired to take action one way or another, a responsible attorney in his position needs to address First Amendment issues one way or the other.

Christopher King said...

Some fathead tool asked me if I seriously consider myself a Journalist, so I told him in a word, yes.

Here's some good Journalism for you:



08 February 2008

KingCast reveals the real rap sheet on Gregory W. Floyd and asks why Kelly Ayotte continues to protect him, the Teflon Don of North Country.

Remember how I went to the State Department of Safety and obtained a number of documents about Gregory W. Floyd from Attorney Marta Modigliani? Well here are some of them, and there are more I will obtain before we rock the movie. As you read this be aware that Floyd is not allowed to have a gun, pursuant to U.S. v. Ruckman.

1. Floyd was a military AWOL liarhead.
2. Assault and disturbing the peace?
3. In violation of Mass and Federal Law?
4. Held guns in Mass.
5. Search warrant signed by Judge Cyr.
6. Stole the Virgin Mary #1.
7. Stole the Virgin Mary #2.
8. Newspapers scared of Floyd.

But that's not all. Gregory Floyd, in addition to being convicted of three (3) felonies in Georgia, also went on a bit of a terror streak in Massachusetts under SSN 26*.84.838_. This is all oral but the docs are on their way. I can't believe this dirtbag was born on my birthday. Ewwwww......

Clinton District Court:
20 August 1984
Docket #82342
Assault & Battery w/Dangerous Weapons
Dismissed

Lowell District Court:
10 July 1987
Docket # 87CR-1342A/1343A/1343B
Assault w/Dangerous Weapons

Ayer District Court:
17 Sept. 1996
Docket # 9648CR-0929A
Disorderly Person N/G
Disturbing the Peace Guilty

Grafton Superior Court
1 July 1998
Criminal Threatening Guilty

Franconia School District
Year uncertain file not in front of me.
Affidavit on file in 07-E-268, Floyd threatened to send someone home in a body bag, "I know where you live and I know the route you take home, and if you're not careful they'll send you home in a body bag."

Grafton Superior Court
28 December 2007
Permanent Restraining Order
Download/Listen to Audio here.