May it please the Court:
I. New and Ongoing violations.
First and foremost, Attorney Mullen falsely claims
“The point is that he was not a licensed attorney at the time he represented himself as such.”
Attorney Mullen has not one iota – not one shred of evidence that his statement is true. In fact, it is resoundingly false.
First of all, the ill-motivated First Amendment attack against me by his client in the form of an Indictment of Attempted Felony Extortion was nol-prossed after I sat through voir dire, eager to have a trial, and that is a FACT.
Second, the Unauthorized Practice of Law case brought by Mullen’s erstwhile boss Kelly Ayotte was DISMISSED.