Reuters news agency reported that regulators charged the bank with "failing to prevent suspected money laundering."
I wish I had seen these before I filed yesterday in my MCAD discrimination lawsuit, in which I used their own position description to prove they lied about the Decision Maker in my case (refusing to open a bank account for me) being black. Citibank seems to think everything I did or allegedly did wrong is at issue, but as I proved yesterday with Citibank facing lawsuits from black employees about those racist emails circulated by management, two can play that game.
Citibank forced to pay back $14M in sweeps money scammed from their customers.
Between 1992 and 2003, Citibank operated an "automatic sweeping" program that would without notice remove positive balances from customers' credit card accounts—mainly those of the poor and the recently deceased—and pocket the money. Now it's paying back $14 million dollars to the affected customers, plus another $3.5 million in penalties to California, thanks to that state's Attorney General.
Nice. Yet these dirtbags accuse me of running a scam? Piss off, I'm filing this with MCAD today as well you lying scum corporate douchebags.
Marc Dann v. Citibank, CASE NO. 2:07 CV 1149, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52172
In the Complaint, Plaintiff alleges violations of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act ("OCSPA"), Ohio Rev. Code § 1345.01 et seq. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that CitiBank through its agent or employee, produced and distributed fliers on or around the Ohio State University main campus offering students a free sandwich and drink at Potbelly Sandwich Work's off-campus location, without disclosing that to obtain the free items, a student was required to complete an application [*3] for a CitiBank credit card.IV. CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Remand for Lack of Diversity Jurisdiction (Doc. # 14), GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Remand for Lack of Federal Question Jurisdiction (Doc. # 37), DENIES Plaintiff's request for costs and attorney fees, DENIES CitiBank's request for oral argument, DENIES AS MOOT CitiBank's Motion to Strike (Doc. # 10), and DENIES AS MOOT CitiBank's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 9). The Clerk is DIRECTED to REMAND this matter to the Franklin County Common Pleas Court.
Conversely, in all of my years of practice (’93-2002) and subsequently as a Licensed Title Insurance Producer handling millions of dollars nobody has EVER accused me of misappropriating funds or illegally taking money. As Complaining Party, it has become readily apparent who the real scammers are, with documented and cohesive plans to lie, cheat and steal. They started this little game and I fully intend to finish it. This is war, folks.
Citibank and their lawyer, Sam Shaulson (pictured next to his likeness Lucifer) are lower than whale puke (except abergris is actually a valuable commodity) and I have duly notified New York Attorney Grievance Committee of his misrepresentations. Gone are the days when these lying fat-cat attorneys can just lie and cheat with impunity, If I catch you lying -- and I don't just mean making a valid counter argument but willfully lying -- I will put you Main Street U.S.A. and give you a hell ride you'll never forget. Long live the First Amendment.
PS: Citibank is racist blog is now listed on Huffington Post.