Therefore I'll be amending my Reply Memoranda to note that not only can one read the name one the back of the canceled check, banks scan images as a virtual signature; that's how they check signatures. Therefore the bank is fully aware that they opened a bank account for "JRT" and Attorney Shaulson should be summarily sanctioned for yet another deceitful and dilatory (in)action.
This in addition to the fact that they could have checked their own records for the day date and time in question and sorted that out in minutes.
Query, what if we really were dangerous people or terrorists, does Respondent hold the position that they would not be able to provide any information about the identity of "JRT" and whether they opened an account for her?
Citibank's position is 100% Sanctionable.
As for Ditmar he has shown signs of intelligence, listen to him in the KingCast YouTube video when he says
"Seems to me the State wanted to close the chapter on this and declare the officer and Mr. Floyd as heroes and try to paint Liko as some sort of serial killer. I don't feel protected by the Police, I feel intimidated by the Police."