07 November 2008

KingCast presents: The Affidavit of Davey Kenney, regarding the First Amendment and the behavior of Martha McLeod and Governor John Lynch.

UPDATE 16 August 2009 -- The scanned Affidavit disappeared, just as my entire blog about thankfully former NH AG Kelly Ayotte did. America and the Internet are not what they claim to be, i.e. free and open.

KINGCAST V. MCLEOD et al, Grafton Superior 08-E-192
AFFIDAVIT OF DAVEY KENNEY


Now comes Affiant, being first duly sworn and subject to the pains of Perjury to solemnly aver:
1. I am the natural father of Liko Peter Kenney and Michele Kenney is my wife and natural mother of Liko Peter Kenney;
2. We have followed Chris King’s 1st Amendment Page, the weblog law related blog “blawg” of Petitioner KingCast for more than a year and encourage his tenacity toward understanding everything that contributed to the tragedy of 5/11 and properly-failed HB 1428 Bruce McKay Highway;
3. As such, we invited blawg owner Christopher King to a Cannon Mountain event featuring Governor John Lynch and soon-to-be former State Representative Martha McLeod;
4. The purpose of the invite was so that Mr. King could follow up with two respectful letters he had issued to Lynch and McLeod asking them to engage in fact-finding in the Franconia area because both of them had entirely ignored these letters as attached at items A and B;
5. At the July 19 2008 event, I took the outdoor picture seen at item C as McLeod ran away from us and approached security while pointing at us;
6. Once inside McLeod walked up to us from across the tram room and said “you are stalking me, there are laws against that”;
7. Mr. King asked “How are we stalking you – you just approached us?” McLeod asked who Mr. King was and he told her “I’m the fellow who wrote that letter to you that you ignored and ran to Jeff Strelzin,” and then asked “are you a public official here today in a public capacity?”
8. McLeod refused to answer him and I introduced myself as Davey Kenney, then she shook my hand but not Mr. King’s hand, even though we both were acting respectfully at all times;
9. Mr. King handed Governor Lynch some reading materials and asked Governor Lynch to come to the town for a public forum about the tragedy of 5/11 and Governor Lynch just turned and handed them to Rich McLeod, Martha McLeod's husband and Franconia Selectman;
10. I have since seen her email to gofranconia.com owner Mr. Johnson (Item D), in which she also threatened him with legal action by calling the police on him for his emails to her and I think that her behavior is way out of line for a public official and I thoroughly encourage this Court to order her to produce any and all emails that she sent to anyone and everyone, except for her family members regarding HB 1428 as Mr. King noted by way of Kidd v. Department of Justice, 362 F.Supp.2d 291 D.D.C. (2005), which held that constituent letters to elected Senators are public subject to redaction of constituent names only.
11. I know for fact that citizens from the Franconia area petitioned Chief Montminy and the town of Franconia to fire Bruce McKay.

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT

Related post:
Let the Sun shine in; the view from Liko's bus.

27 comments:

Christopher King said...

Yah, the other day some clown was saying on some stupid chat board about how "I don't think it happened the way King said it happened up there on the Mountain...."

What a tool.

And I suppose the email to gofranconia.com is a lie and a forgery, too.

No, wait.

The forgery was the Brian Jesseman one where some clown, possibly an LE or even Miss Martha herself claiming that Liko Kenney's friend Brian Jesseman supported HB 1428 Bruce McKay highway.

There were some jurisdictional issues in that case, and the Hillsborough Court threw the case out when Brian was sick and missed one preliminary hearing but guess what:

Plenty of time on the Statute of Limitations on that one.

-The KingCaster.

Anonymous said...

see who gofranconia.com is registered to and then be a GOOD journalist and tell us the truth about what you find.

There is an agenda by the person who owns the site you know the same guy who owns the motel.

Christopher King said...

Agendas don't matter when it comes to Right-to-Know, fool.

What was Miss Martha's agenda when she disrespected the Franconia Recovery and Reconciliation Committee and her constituents, an action that cost her a Senate seat.

Even if there is an "agenda," you'll excuse me for not covering each and every fact I don't find germane to the right to know issue, just as the major media did not cover Bruce McKay beating his wife and the attempts to remove him from office and stuff.

-The KingCaster.

Anonymous said...

If it was the other way around it would be germane though wouldn't it. It relates to the credibility of the persons true intent. What she did was disagree with you and a few citizens in the collective. I highly doubt the 1,262 votes she didn't receive are directly related to the Franconia issue. You continue to dismiss Ms. McLeod is a Democrat who tried to unseat a Republican incumbent in a predominently Republican district. That doesn't suit YOUR scenario of untruth, when in fact that is more the reality of her not winning the election. Try injecting a bit of non biased honesty once in a while in your blogs.

Christopher King said...

8:57 wrote:

"What she did was disagree with you and a few citizens in the collective. I highly doubt the 1,262 votes she didn't receive are directly related to the Franconia issue."

A. It was a whole lot more than a few people, fool.

B. And I don't give a damn what YOU "doubt" about the votes, that's mere conjecture not supported by the overwhelming response from the locals to HB 1428 Bruce McKay Highway. I have read hundreds of emails on that, have you? Not to mention that in addition to those hundreds, their friends who didn't write could make up the difference because all you need is 632 swing votes to make the difference, do the math.

C. She was dishonest and failed to tell ANYONE of her actions, including her constituents and people on the Franconia Recovery and Reconciliation Committee.

D. I shall await your substantive comment about Davey's Affidavit my friend. You know, the subject of the post.

Non-biased honesty?

I don't see you demanding same from the Union Leader.

-The KingCaster.

Christopher King said...

PS:

What you and yer buddy Miss Martha had better recognize is that constituents are permitted to have agendas and they are permitted to send emails and to voice opinions without fear of government threats to call the police.

That's what up, dude.

Get it?

Got it?

Good.

-The KingCaster.

********

McLeod threatened a constituent with charges of harassment because she didn’t want to be listed as the Representative for Franconia on a local community website or receive emails that were being distributed to members of an opt-in mailing list. She had originally asked to be placed on the opt-in list. Rep. McLeod is interested in hearing from constituents that agree with her but threatens a criminal investigation if one disagrees with her position.

(Text of email from Rep. Mcleod)

From: McLeod, Martha
To: info@gofranconia.com
Cc: Gallus, John ; rburton@nh.gov
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 5:43 PM
Subject: Consider this notice

Mr. Johnson,

Please remove me from your email list and your website. Your website is an unreliable source of information for the public. It is a well known fact in the community that the information posted there and sent out has most certainly been tampered with to achieve the results you and others are looking for and to harass public officials, including me.

Do not contact me again. If you continue to harass me I will notify NH House Security and the NH State Police and ask them to investigate.

Rep Martha McLeod

10:02 AM

Christopher King said...

8:57

Ha, McLeod not a loser, she lost HB 1428 in and of itself.

If you think that puppy EVER gets re-enacted you're sadly mistaken.

My law license, I can get that back, just like that disbarred convicted felon Mike McLaughlin, 'cos, like, I'm not disbarred or convicted of any damn thing.

And for now my legal knowledge is serving the Cause of the First Amendment just fine.


-The KingCaster.

Anonymous said...

I read your post jackass, all you have is this persons side of the story. You don't know what else transpired to cause the email to be sent. You NEVER comfirm anything before you run with it and publish it on Chris King's 1st Amendment Page.
What you need to understand jackass is that just because you send a communication doesn't mean the person needs to respond. That is their choice, and if they feel threatened or harassed that is their right to notify the authorities as well. This isn't "The world according to Christopher King" you have no problem squealing like a little school girl when your "rights" are violated. Grow up jackass, and try verifying information before you run a story as gospel truth.

Christopher King said...

1:52

Two sides to every story so please advise as to your take on Davey Kenney's Affidavit, fool. What's the "other side" of THAT story, jackass?

Sure, Martha is free to ignore everybody and do whatever the hell she wants.

She's also free to lose her seat in the finance subcommittee and lose the election.

And you seem to need remedial
reading courses because the issue is twofold:

1. Her arrogant refusals to respond to me or to the area constituents as she ignored them.

2. Her duties to provide emails pursuant to Kidd v. Department of Justice, 362 F.Supp.2d 291 D.D.C. (2005).

You're late to class, without a hall pass.

Christopher King said...

PS:

"Squeal like a school girl," naw, fool I STOOD MY GROUND and waited for Kelly and the flunkie Chief Dunn to take me to trial from when I was NAACP Legal Chair, sitting through voir dire but they ran like lil' puppies that peed themselves.

Just the facts, fool.

Anonymous said...

"11. I know for fact that citizens from the Franconia area petitioned Chief Montminy and the town of Franconia to fire Bruce McKay."

Was that when Davey and Michelle were in Hawaii and spoke to the Attorney you referenced previously. The one that stated in an email you have posted about Likos troubles, and I quote roughly "I spoke to Davey on several occasions, he wanted to help but nothing ever happened." That was 5 months before the tragedy.

Mr. Kenney should take responsibility for his own INACTIONS before he points the finger looking to blame everyone so he doesn't have to accept his own culpability.

Anonymous said...

christopher king said:
"I STOOD MY GROUND and waited for Kelly and the flunkie Chief Dunn to take me to trial from when I was NAACP Legal Chair, sitting through voir dire but they ran like lil' puppies that peed themselves."

REALLY, the case was dismissed you weren't found innocent. If they had done anything inappropriately you would have sued their asses in a civil case, the fact is they didn't. You had and have nothing to sue them on so you launch your blog vendetta, under your so-called 1st amendment page.

Christopher King said...

5:17

Let me school you MF (short for "My Friend")

1. Kelly dismissed the Unauthorized Practice of Law case because she had no case.

2. Kelly and Chief Dunn dismissed the Attempted Felon Extortion case because they had no case, AFTER I SAT THROUGH VOIR DIRE AND WAS READY FOR TRIAL.

3. I didn't sue them because in NH LE can abuse the system by nol prossing a case which makes it all but impossible to sue them because they could technically bring it back.

I wish they WOULD bring it back but in reality it was just a tool they use to intimidate Civil Rights activists.

You should know a lot about tools:

You are one, and you spend an inordinate amount of time playing with yours while you call women "bitches."

-The KingCaster.

Christopher King said...

But thanks for giving me the opportunity to explain yet another way that NH LE can abuse innocent people who challenge them.

Namaste.

-c

PS: It's not a "so-called First Amendment Page," it is a First Amendment page, ipso facto.

Christopher King said...

5:08

Actually Mr. Kenney (whose Affidavit you have completely failed to address, surprise, surprise) was very proactive in trying to draw attention to the situation.

The letter to which you refer is the Troy Watts ethics complaint against Bruce McKay that the town took an entire year to forward to me, right?

Izzat the one you're squawking about, MF? (My Friend).

Anonymous said...

Mr. Kenney's affidavit??? That affidavit has you wording and style of writing MF, in fact many of the words are the same eaxct ones you used in previous blogs you have written, long before the mention of Mr. Kenney's affidavit.

I notice you ignored the post about what Troy Watts had written about Davey and Michelle Kenney's lack of helping Liko 5 months prior to his death.
"bitch" is mild in comparision to your descriptive terms like C**T or DOUCHEBAG that you use repeatedly.

First amendment means being able to express oneself with whatever terms they wish to use, without being censored and free from retribution. This site and you do NOT believe in that. This blog is nothing more than your place to spew forth your irrational hatred, and contempt for anyone who disagrees with you, and for everything the United States Constitution represents and stands for.

Let me make it even simpler for you, even a 6th grader knows you don't publish information unless you know it is a verified FACT. I would estimate 95% of what you write in this "so-called First Amendment Page" is NOT fact but nothing more than rumors, innuendos, gossip, and made up stories.

Anonymous said...

The above poster beat me to the punch I was going to post the wording in Davey's affidavit is very similar to the words and phrases you use. Sounds like you might be writing affidavits for people. Would that be considered practicing law?

Still hung up on that Brian Jesseman issue. Writing speculations and passing them off as fact, that some clown could be anuybody, including you or even his activist father trying to stir up the pot. Do you have proof it was Martha McCleod or law enforcement.

I find it amusing, you claim to fight for the first amendment, and when the judge told you it was the price we pay for living in a free society. Now you want to limit free speech and free exchange of ideas. If anybody knew Brian Jesseman, they would not need to ask him if he supposted that bill, and if I recall the post stated he did not want to have a part of I93 named in honor of Bruce McKay. I would venture a guess that one of his friends posted it as a joke and if you had not made such a huge issue out of it they might have come forward but now are too embarrassed to say anything.

Christopher King said...

4:52

I see your "analytical" skills are pitiful. We filed suit, remember jackass?

Doesn't make sense that Brian and I would file suit so that the court could order the UL to expose that his friends or I had written the comment.

The speculations you make are hootlarious, like the one in which you speculate that Miss Martha's loss had nothing to do with HB 1428 Bruce McKay highway.

And oh, yah, Davey told me what to write in the affidavit and I typed it down. It wouldn't matter one iota if I wrote it myself as long as he swears to it, which he will.

And you still have no substantive comment on it.

Nice.

Christopher King said...

4:39

You are so stupid and you are a liar.

Go find where I used the word C**T

A douchebag is an inanimate object, which you are.

No woman would say that it is worse to be called a douchebag than the word you used to describe your first wife, you shrill and insecure misogynist tool.

-The KingCaster.

Anonymous said...

christopher king wrote:
"I see your "analytical" skills are pitiful. We filed suit, remember jackass?

Doesn't make sense that Brian and I would file suit so that the court could order the UL to expose that his friends or I had written the comment."

Sure it does, I think you came up with the whole idea about the letter to the UL and sent it yourself,with Brian Jesseman's name. That's why you never went any further with the case, and I told Jeff that.


"And oh, yah, Davey told me what to write in the affidavit and I typed it down. It wouldn't matter one iota if I wrote it myself as long as he swears to it, which he will."Preparing legal documents, you are under a Ohio Supreme Court order to specifically refrain from conducting such activities.

"It wouldn't matter one iota if I wrote it myself as long as he swears to it, which he will."

Then you are a liar statingthe following, when he hasn't signed any affidavit yet:"KingCast presents: The Affidavit of Davey Kenney, regarding the First Amendment and the behavior of Martha McLeod and Governor John Lynch."

Anonymous said...

I've got emails where you used the word C**T, and you did in topix as well.

Christopher King said...

7:07

Post the entire comment or STFU.

-The KingCaster.

Christopher King said...

7:05

Oh, forgot to mention, nothing prohibits me from drafting legal documents that are to be used in my own case, fool.

That would be Unconstitutional, you stupid jackass scared kitty cat, here's a picture of you Bill.

Jeff doesn't give a rat's ass what you say, he knows you oars haven't touched water in years.

-The KingCaster.

Anonymous said...

pretty thin skinned aren't you BOY.

You buddy Jeff, yeah all his political rhetoric about transparency, all the while conspiring with you. Condoning your actions publicly while condemning them in private.

Christopher King said...

What's your name, boy?

Coward.

Christopher King said...

PS:

Just spoke with Davey.

His signed Affidavit is forthcoming.

Namaste.

Anonymous said...

Why have an affidavit, as long is Davey is around, a court of law will expect his testimony, not a piece of paper, When asked did you write this document, he will have to say he did not write it. The credibility gone.