11 November 2008

KingCast celebrates Veteran's Day at work, thankful for the beauty of America.

A slow day at work today so after hours I figured I would fire up the Crackberry and show some appreciation: See, Vets fought and died for my right to use the First Amendment to keep a check on irresponsible, lying government officials. Now that I have pretty much wrapped up that tour of duty in New Hampshire for a while, I move on to another perimeter for a while.

Thanks Uncle Joe, RIP.

It's KingCastic!

47 comments:

Christopher King said...

I ain't picking up no plates no more, not that there's anything wrong with that.

C'mon Billy boy, spew some more venom this way.

I can set my watch by it.

-The KingCaster

Anonymous said...

Nice picture of the general. You spouting off about the military and you don't know a damn thing about your uncle. If you were at all close you would know the difference between and enlisted and an officer.

Christopher King said...

4:09

Did I say he was enlisted?

Nope.

Just like you said I used the "c-word" somewhere but I never did that, either.

Jackass.

Anonymous said...

chris king wrote 4:09

"Did I say he was enlisted?

Nope.

Just like you said I used the "c-word" somewhere but I never did that, either.

Jackass."

Your so intelligent? You can't even figure out my posts always put yours in quotes are my responses are always made in bold font.

I didn't make the 4:09 post with "general" comment, so once again you are wrong.

Trust me you did indeed you the C word just as sure as you dropped your pants to play little subordinate (submissive) black vibrator boy for a former employer. The really twisted part is you are proud and brag about it.
You act appalled at what what Martin Dunn stated to you yet you used the same sexual description in your very on blog stating the same type of sexual activity happened to you by a former employer(albeit you did say it was a parody). You also made light of rape in an online forum in reponse to the question How do you get a date? Christopher King "rape" it had your active link to your blog site.
Don't act like a victim and appalled when someone says comments like that to you. Your behavior and language is just as reprehensible if not worse.
I at one time and having never even met you contacted an attorney I knew and had documents drawn up on your behalf and was prepared to incur the cost.
6 months later when I state I can no longer remain in the
Franconia Collective because of our different viewpoints I'm a jackass an idiot, a person who "musta done one to many rails in his high flying daze", a douche bag and a M*T*E* F*C*E*R, and a host of other names.
I'll never deny the phrases I used to describe you, you took it to the street and the gutter, not me, and I was playin' by those rules before you were even born.

MY first amendment right allow me to state my opinion free from retribution by you, isn't that the very thing you are bitching about Martha McLeod about because she stated she felt she was being harassed, just because the guy was asking her questions. What you do is no different, you try to silence people with intimidation (especially women, and when that doesn't work you revert to everything that as JD holder you should find reprehensible, breaching confidentially by disclosing personal information, making sexual references, verbal abuse, profanity etc.
Above and beyond that as supposed "man" unless you hate your mother, no man would direct comments such as you have at any woman, at least no REAL man I know.

You want to do Liko Kenney's memory justice "Think smarter NOT Harder."
I'm outta here, this is my last post
Bill Christy
(stage name, not my given name)

Christopher King said...

Good, get the hell out of here, you are a liar and I just told WTF about you and I'll get to that in a minute, but first of all Martin Dunn laughed about the possibility of me being raped in prison before I kicked his ever loving arse and made the State drop the charges against me.

That has nothing to do with a female superior giving me a sexual command and a company having to pay me for it, duh.

And I never wrote the "c-word" in an email but I sure can show how you lied about your actions in your emails, you dumb ass:

*********

Here is what I sent WTF, straight from your 15 August email exchanges with me, along with WTF observations of your actions:

********

"Hey Chris,Sorry I haven't got back sooner I was in NY for 2 gigs. I sent the email to TOPIX requesting my posts be removed, I have not heard back. I do however have a telephone number and plan on calling them today. We are leaving for Sardania on Sunday for 2 weeks before schools arts up but I will keep in touch. Can you please send me your cell number again I misplaced it. I wish you luck with the get together in Franconia, hopefully it starts some healing in the community. Thanks,Bill"

Seems like you lied, the same sort of things you accuse Mr. King of doing back in Ohio only you did it this summer.

You actions belie your words, Sir.

Meanwhile he claims he wrote this to you, removing some posts yet you failed to live up to your end of the bargain:

"I really hope that going forward we can all stick to the merits of the case because by golly there are a ton of them.

I'll be removing some of the posts tonight and more in the coming future.

Let me know how Topix responds to your request to delete."

All the best,

-c

So that's King's emails about you. Do you have those emails about him saying "c*nt?"

Christopher King said...

Now for once stay true to your word and get the hell outta' here, you mentally-disturbed hate bag.

I am so glad I annoy the living daylights out of you :)

-The KingCaster.

Christopher King said...

Then there's this:

"Your so intelligent?..."

.....Yah, well at least I know my possessive pronouns.

Muuuuaaahhhhh....

Anonymous said...

Disclosing private emails again I see another act of moral turpitude, and unethical practices. perhaps you need to refresh yourself on disclosing private emails to ther people or on the internet. You know the legal clause: "This email is for the intended receiver only and legally may not be shared with others without senders express written consent."
Bill Christy

Anonymous said...

Produce anything from TOPIX stating that I did not contact them as we agreed. I did you knew I contacted them , and you knew they didn't remove the posts,you thanked me for trying, end of the story.
Now you dig it up, lying and playing victim again, because I'm posting in your blog. Just more proof of you tactics to try and silence someone and prevent them from exercising their 1st amendment rights. You want me out of here get a court order.

Christopher King said...

Too bad you didn't put that limiting language on your email.

You could have easily disbanded the account but you didn't follow up, no follow through on your promise.

I don't want you out of here, I don't want you in here.

Whatever you do is cool with me.

Tosser.

Christopher King said...

PS:

I thought you said you were out of here.

Just another lie.

You can't understand natural thinking can you Bill?

Christopher King said...

Then there was this gem:

"You also made light of rape in an online forum in reponse to the question How do you get a date? Christopher King "rape" it had your active link to your blog site."

.....Another absolute, total, unmitigated lie. Some tool tried to link my blog to some crazy chat room and whatnot, total total crap, just like the allegation that I used the "c-word."

People try to make this blawg into issues about me, when really the more interesting question is why do these people continue to follow someone who allegedly says nothing of any legal import?

I would never seek out someone else's blawg to continue to rant and rave about him or her if they did not have anything of substance to say.

But then again, Bill cannot understand natural thinking, so it makes perfect sense.

-The KingCaster

Anonymous said...

Christopher King said...
"Too bad you didn't put that limiting language on your email.

You could have easily disbanded the account but you didn't follow up, no follow through on your promise."

BULLSHIT TOPIX would not honor my request, and even if I could had "disbanded" the account the posts would have still remained.

What did you do after I informed you TOPIX did not respond, NOTHING !!
Because it wasn't an issue, and if it was you could have easily requested the posts be removed as offensive YOU NEVER DID, end of the story.

I notice you once again restrict my 1st amendment rights by deleting my posts made. You do this while professing to the world to be a civil rights/1st amendment rights advocate. The only ist amendment rights you care about are your own, you've been waging the battle for 1o years and haven't gotten anywhere.

As Jeff Strezlin stated to me in a conversation we had to bad you waste you talent, because you have so much anger and hatred. We aren't all wrong about your personality issues.

AOL email default clearly states this in their privacy clause.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court has found the concept of "privacy" to be protected by a number of the Amendments. Thus, privacy is known as a "penumbra right." It is the essence of the Bill of Rights and thus a guaranteed right. You should know this because Ohio, Texas as well as California all have upheld the privacy of personal emails sent to a specific party, that were subsequently disclosed to another party or on the Internet.

Anonymous said...

Oh poor wittle cwissy always the victim he came fwom a bwoken home even though he was 35 at the time.
evweybody picks on him, they did it in ohio, texas, virginia, massachusetts, the NAACP, nh.

How many times have you stated you were going to stay out of TOPIX yet you don't.

You never contacted the Internet blog to have the rape comment removed, it's still there to this day, yet you claim you never posted it. BULLSHIT dude.
When you posted your lies about me I was all over it, just as I was once before in another case involving the Internet. Nobody who claims they didn't make a comment would sit back and let it remain there damaging their reputation, especially you, tha's why you went after Marty Dunn and Kelley Ayotte and continue to do so.

Anonymous said...

chris king wrote:
"People try to make this blawg into issues about me, when really the more interesting question is why do these people continue to follow someone who allegedly says nothing of any legal import?

I would never seek out someone else's blawg to continue to rant and rave about him or her if they did not have anything of substance to say."

You made this blog about you just by virtue of the name of it:
"Chris King's 1st Amendment Page"
you post erroneous information and I exercising MY 1st Amendment rights post correct information. You don't like that so you start the personal attacks.
You seek out every free forum and blog you can and continually berate, demean, rebuke, abuse, anyone who posts anything contrary to your beliefs. You have been banned from more Internet sites than anyone I know for the tactics you claim you would never do. You are a living breathing contradiction.

Anonymous said...

Christopher King said...
4:09

"Did I say he was enlisted?

Nope."

Your uncle WAS an enlisted man, 3 up 2 down is a E-7 SFC Sargent First Class.

Christopher King said...

4:36

Yah, I thought so but my point was I didn't say anything either way.

Bill Christy might be a veteran but he's still a tosser.

-c

Christopher King said...

"As Jeff Strezlin stated to me in a conversation we had to bad you waste you talent, because you have so much anger and hatred. We aren't all wrong about your personality issues."

.....Good to know that your siding up with people who are known and proved liars, Bill. You know, people to whom State Rep. McLeod turns when she doesn't want to deal with a very respectful letter that said "I want to make a movie about a town that healed itself."

To that point I had not one bad thing to say about Martha McLeod.

You and Jeff are a natural pair of tossers, dude and neither of you are poised to pass judgment on what I do with my talent. I am fully comfortable with my role in life.

-The KingCaster.

Christopher King said...

Wasted talent?

Tell Jeff to look at his boss.

You and Strelzin in this instance are both tools of the hegemonic Right, that is the extent of your "talent."

******

19 September 2008

KingCast says it's official: Kelly Ayotte blew it on the Constitutional issue of juvenile DNA testing & reporting; bring on the lawsuits.

A very reliable source informs me that the NH HHS is about to rescind its Unconstitutional Policy, which Kelly supported. This development paves the way for million dollar lawsuits, yah.

Query, just how many illegal DNA samples were collected? Where are they being held? Who has had access to them?

Internet trolls love trying to keep me down. "Kelly's such a great lawyer," and "she is what you always wish you could be," and blah blah blah. Nonsense. She is a horrible public officer and I've got the facts to prove it. I knew from the git-go when she came after me when I wrote a simple Demand Letter as NAACP legal chair something was fishy in Denmark. Look at recent AG legal atrocity exhibition:

Franconia, Liko Kenney
Nashua, Michael Paulhus
Nashua, Christopher King
Jaffrey, Aaron Deboisbriand
Dalton, Diane Lyon
Hooksett, Gerard Beloin
Statewide: Carey Carlberg/Trooper's mediation
Statewide: Same-sex marriage
National, Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood (imploded on remand and Judge Di Clerico awarded attorney fees a coupla' weeks ago hahahahaha they kept that out of most major press but KingCast don't play that).

Lisbon, names and circumstances withheld at present

Anonymous said...

One of your first post I read almost 18 months ago you went on and on about how much your uncle contributed to raising and directing your future and you addressed him as a general. Once again I question how important he must have been if you did not even know what had had done in the military. More words without substance for the paper tiger. Not much point in trying to ge the last word in cwissy has not life and lives on the net, waiting, hoping prying for another hit on HIS "BLAWG", lol, pathetic.

Christopher King said...

5:21

What I said, jackass, is that I thought he was up for Brig. Gen.

His contributions to my life go far beyond his military rank, which was probably higher than yours, anyway.

His nephew (cousin Mike) continues to be an inspiration, our differences aside.

-The KingCaster

Anonymous said...

Last time I checked an E-7 cannot be up for brig, Gen. as you stated. If he was a gen that would far exceed my rank, but as for the E-7 rank it is easily attainable in the current climate for the military.

Christopher King said...

That pic was taken well before discharge.

Well before.

Christopher King said...

And no matter his rank, all that matters is that he was a part of our Armed Forces, as you were.

He supported my Civil Rights activism up until the day he died, unlike you Bill, who you are now friends with Strelzin, as you say.

And you know damn well Strelzin does not support anyone asking questions about him or his boss, so you sold out, you no longer support the vigorous application of First Amendment principles.

Have a nice day.

Anonymous said...

christopher king said...
".....Good to know that your siding up with people who are known and proved liars, Bill."

Wasn't an issue when I was siding with you though...even though you were and still continue to act in a duplicitous manner.

Christopher King said...

When you were siding with me, before you precipitous 180 degree turn toward hell, you were not dealing with liars.

You were dealing with people from the Franconia collective who are seeking the Truth about what happened.

Zero of what you have to say anymore deals with anything substantive Bill, you have not addressed ANY of the law set forth in the pending case.

Sincerely,

-The KingCaster

Anonymous said...

Christopher King said...
"And no matter his rank, all that matters is that he was a part of our Armed Forces, as you were.

He supported my Civil Rights activism up until the day he died, unlike you Bill, who you are now friends with Strelzin, as you say.

And you know damn well Strelzin does not support anyone asking questions about him or his boss, so you sold out, you no longer
Have a nice day."

Pardon my language and delete it if you want are you for fucking real ! I received a call from Mr. Strezlin, (the content of the conversation is none of your business, and anything you post is purely speculative in nature) we had a brief discussion, that hardly makes he and I "friends" as you speculate.
I wouldn't know the man if he was walking in front of me down the street.

Addressing your comments "I sold out, and I no longer support the vigorous application of First Amendment principles, or your Civil Rights activism."

I will lay it out for you one at a time.

1) I totally support the first amendment and all it stands for. What I don't support is your method of exercising your 1st amendment rights any more than I support child pronography or XXX rated movie makers rights.

2)Your "civil rights activism" is not unlike Malcom X, Huey P. Newton, Bobby Seale, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson....
Yours and their style of Activism:

(from Latin, actum, a thing done) the belief that action, as opposed to intellectual theorizing, is the way to truth and constructive social change.

I don't believe that is the 1st Amendment civil rights activism the forefathers, statesman, and authors of the United States Constitution, intended when they wrote it.

Rosa Louise McCauley Parks, Emmett Till, Martin Luther King Jr, the 250,000 people who participated in the 1963 March on Washington are a few names that come to mind, when the I think of what the authors intended, when they wrote the 1st Amendment.

Christopher King said...

So you disagree with Attorney Gilbert on my use and application of the First Amendment.

Big deal.

And you don't like Malcolm X even though he was killed because he came to embrace all peoples after he went to Mecca.

Big Deal.

And you still haven't offered any substantive commentary on the pending litigation.

That actually is a Big Deal.

And you are given to fits of profanity, does "blow job" come to mind?

That actually is a Big Deal too.

And you falsely claim that I used the "c-word."

That is just you being a liar.

And you and others have constantly asked if there were ways to keep me off of Topix; so much for your First Amendment appreciation. Not to worry, I posted on Topix once in the past two weeks or so.

You guys are all a real trip over there, pretty entertaining but not enough to keep Casey Sherman's attention so he bolted when he saw how useless you really are.

*****

As to how you and Attorney Strelzin came together to talk about my use of talent after you sold out, well, y'all keep on chatting because I don't give a rat's ass.

Strelzin is a proved liar, along with his boss, Kelly Ayotte, whether you admit it or not.

-The KingCaster.

Christopher King said...

PS:

What about my activism about Jerry Doyle, pal?

Is that okay that he got sent to the damn hole without any due process hearing?

You're a veteran, but yet still just a tosser-man to me.

Anonymous said...

As they say "when in rome do as the romans do", you took it to the gutter level not me, I just followed your style of choice for debate.

You have been using profanity since you first started your blog in June of 2005 with words and terms far worse than blow job, you are such a hypocrite.

Christopher King said...

Dude I had not been using profanity for months on this blawg.

Sure I used it back when I was under that BS indictment that your buddies Jeffy and Kelly ran, so what.

Style of debate?

Dude I post related cases with case citations, stuff like that.

Show me the last case citation you have used in opposition to my statements.

As to debate skills, high school state qualifier and regional Frederick Douglass Moot Court runner up out of 350 midwest participants in law school.

Little Rock, Ark 1991.

Look it up, fool.

Christopher King said...

Or was Frederick Douglass an "acceptable" Civil Rights leader for you?

I like him.

I kinda like Nat Turner, too.

It's All Good.

Anonymous said...

Christopher King said...
"When you were siding with me, before you precipitous 180 degree turn toward hell, you were not dealing with liars.

You were dealing with people from the Franconia collective who are seeking the Truth about what happened.

Zero of what you have to say anymore deals with anything substantive Bill"
I was dealing with several liars actually one who outright lied to their own flesh and blood to get information for you, and you yourself the first incident which happened within 15 minutes of our initial conversation on the telephone. Lie to me once shame on you, lie to me twice shame on me. There were far to many lies, untruths, ommissions of specific key information (only slanted information was given out by you to support your belief of what went down).

As far as the people of the Franconia Collective, the ones I have issue with I openly discuss, the ones I have no issue with, I don't discuss, and I never did, it's that cut and dry.

On the contray the fact that you have a 10 year pattern of the same continual behavior is substantive. It clearly lends to your personal credibility, and the credibility of the information you publish on the Internet.

Christopher King said...

1:08

I don't care with whom you talk, you still haven't shown me any substantive case law.

10 year pattern of abuse would include getting overtime pay for my trainees, and catching the NAACP and Chief Dunn lying under Oath, right?

Yah.

I guess they were just exercising their First Amendment Rights.

Thanks for letting me bring that up again, doofus.

-The KingCaster

Anonymous said...

REALLY no profanity in months, then who the published this today, alongside a picture of Presidenet elect Barack Obama his lovely wife and 2 beautiful daughters ?

"As you know I like to LEGALLY shoot guns, but Floyd, a multiple felon and lying, probable murderer of Liko Kenney, likes to ILLEGALLY shoot guns and call judges (Littleton District's Peter Cyr) a "FUCKING ASSHOLE" and former LE "MOTHERFUCKER."

Anonymous said...

Go back and look how many times in the last 2 days you have used the acronym STFU.
You are about as pure as the snow plowed along a north country dirt road in the winter time.

Anonymous said...

The U.S. Supreme Court has consistently held that certain "acts" are "speech" for 1st Amendment purposes.

And Rosa Parks didn't
"intellectually theorize" her seat on that bus.

Christopher King said...

Dude I said no profanity except when quoting others.

You got any case citations yet from your principled dialogue?

Is it okay that Marty and Gloria lied under Oath?

Here I am doing more bad things.

Christopher King said...

Yah Bill this was not Uncle Joe's last position but it was in this picture.

*********

Sergeant First Class (SFC) is the seventh enlisted rank in the U.S. Army, above staff sergeant and below master sergeant and first sergeant, and is the first senior non-commissioned officer rank.

In a United States Army platoon, the position of platoon sergeant is normally held by a sergeant first class. The platoon sergeant is the primary assistant and advisor to the platoon leader, a first lieutenant or second lieutenant. When necessary, the platoon sergeant acts as the platoon leader in his or her absence.

Unless the platoon leader has extensive prior enlisted experience, the platoon sergeant has more professional military experience due to the difference of time-in-service, since prior military service is not a prerequisite for a second lieutenant's commission. On occasion, when a sergeant first class is not available, a staff sergeant will perform as platoon sergeant.

A sergeant first class is still addressed as "sergeant" except in certain training situations and schools. If a sergeant first class is appointed to the fill the role of first sergeant, he or she is called "first sergeant".

********

What was your rank, or do I have to look that up as I looked up Gregory W. Floyd's?

Anonymous said...

O-5 LIEUTENANT COLONEL (LTC)
In the Air Force, a Lieutenant Colonel is generally a director of operations or a squadron commander in the operations group, a squadron commander in the mission support and maintenance groups, or a squadron commander or division chief in a medical group. Lieutenant Colonels may also serve on general staffs and may be the heads of some wing staff departments.

Anonymous said...

Look all you want, without my real name you won't get far.

Anonymous said...

Normall a picture in full class A's is used on his promotion board. Promotions boards look at everything, they make sure teh ribbons match his 2-1 and 2-A, they also chech his past performance records and will look at his military bearing, like his hair cut, your uncle was not within regs. If you could not get a haircut that was within confines of AR 670-1 for a professinal picture that could make or break his chances on getting the next promotion, E-8. What type of NCO was he? I would not give him the nod for a promotion.

Christopher King said...

3:39

That's hootlarious, you call me phony but I put my identity up front and for the open and nobody even knows your real name.

What a dookie-bomb you are.

I could find your real identity if I felt like it though.

3:52

Fortunately, Uncle Joe didn't have to answer to a armchair wanker twit like you.

-The KingCaster.

Christopher King said...

PS: Bill Christy what was your highest rank?

I see you didn't answer that.

Not that it matters because you would just make it up, like me espousing rape or using the "c-word."

Sorry dude but Beth Ann Faragher and I see eye to eye on the abuse of women, if you need any help with that Google her name, fool. We were study friends in law school and sat next to each other.

You're just a tosser man all the way MF (my friend).

Anonymous said...

O-5 LIEUTENANT COLONEL (LTC)

I posted it at 3:37

Christopher King said...

Very good.

Now what about the emails I forwarded to WTF in Ga?

*********

Sir, Mr. King wrote me and provided a copy of the emails. You lied again just like you lied about him saying "c*nt."

It looks like he gives you credit for some of your observations and he added some of his.

Is this the email chain? I can see where Mr. King cut out some email addresses but I'd have to be high as a Georgia Pine to think he made up the comments, Sir.

You tell me.

RE: fixed one more Big Thing
Saturday, February 2, 2008 4:42 PM
From: "Christopher King" kingjurisdoctor@yahoo.com
To: __________aol.com

Floyd even said to the AG investigators after killing Liko, "I'm OK I've killed 43 people," yet when asked for any investigation as to whom he killed (he never went overseas or served in Vietnam combat despite his claims) the AG had nothing.

Saturday, February 2, 2008 2:21 PM

RE: Beefed it up a bit included your revision
Saturday, February 2, 2008 2:21 PM
From: "Christopher King" kingjurisdoctor@yahoo.com
To: __________aol.com
All good and I know you've seen the bullet hole addition. That's GOTTA be there. Thanks so much for being a part of this thing man, you've given a lot that has helped, including the initial call on 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) that the Fed AG is going to try to ignore :)

-c

Re: What do you think ...Saturday, February 2, 2008 2:07 PM
From: This sender is DomainKeys verified "Christopher King" kingjurisdoctor@yahoo.com
gotta put something in about "Caleb said Floyd had the gun pointed at them before we even got on the road, and he rained down the windshield bullet at that time -- which the AG never analysed but we have seen the pictures of the inward bullet hole." The AG did in fact analyse bullet holes in a barn and carport.

________@gmail.com wrote:
the content definitely reflects my position in the matter, and it's as good a time as any to move toward the ultimate goal of making floyd accountable....which is what this is alll about.
L

Re: What do you think ...Saturday, February 2, 2008 1:49 PM

From: "Christopher King" kingjurisdoctor@yahoo.com

One key change: What Liko Kenney did appears wrong, but we know from Caleb Macaulay's contemporaneous statements that he was genuinely in fear of Bruce McKay, which most likely renders his act no more than manslaughter.

Christopher King said...

So I gave you credit on 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) that you, as an intelligent being, must have researched BEFORE you spoke.

Then you had that precipitous 180 degree turn toward hell.

Nice.

Tosser.