13 September 2008

KingCast reviews NH Gov. John Lynch pledge of integrity vis a vis Liko Kenney and Michael Paulhus with NH AAG Francesca Stabile.

Dear Governor Lynch:

Please remember your pledge as you read this post about dirty NH LE and my meeting with Senator Biden, and this quote from the Union Leader:
'Lynch a millionaire businessman-turned politician, unseated Republican Craig Benson in 2004 by promising to replace a 'culture of corruption' with one of integrity and bipartisanship. He became the first challenger since 1926 to unseat a freshman Governor in the state, largely using a single issue; integrity'
***********
From Paulhus: “The Defendant’s waiver of his Miranda rights was involuntary as it was induced by the trickery and deceit of the officers, particularly Det. Maloney…. In this case, Det. Maloney and Sgt. Parenteau misrepresented the nature of their investigation from the moment they entered the interrogation room with the defendant....Motion to Suppress GRANTED.
-Judge Bernard J. Hampsey, Jr., June 30 2005

Yet no punishment from Ayotte or Governor Lynch. And I just got a very interesting email from someone in North Country who will remain nameless: "Chris, I have much information that will interest you about injustice(s) in the North Country, some of which leads back to Ms. Ayotte's office in Concord. It's a long story that I will gladly relate to you." Update: He did. And it's all going to come down on Kelly and NH HHS for unlawfully seizing hundreds of juvenile DNA samples per RSA 651-C. Got judicial orders noting that DNA testing could not be compelled against non-violent juvenile offenders, but the State of New Hampshire has been doing it for at least four (4) years.

In any event, Governor, please shoot me an email so I can teach you how to actually ride a motorcycle. It's a blast.

Dear Attorney Stabile:
I received your 10 September 2008 letter in which you tell me you need 45 days to stonewall me. Good thing I'll be amending KingCast v. McLeod 08-E-192 well before that to catch anything you try to hold back. Here is what I'm suing to obtain from your boss, Kelly Ayotte:

1. The missing videotape of the Paulhus shooting area that Sgt. Peter Bouchard claimed was being made in his 18 July, 2004 report that I have sitting on my desk. Update: See Bouchard report "They did request a Nashua officer to stand by during the videotaping portion of the crime scene processing to assist in traffic control......" But see 25 March 2005 9:21 a.m. filing "Motion for Additional Discoery -- a Videotape Recording of the Scene or Confirmation on the Record That no Such Tape Exists."
2. All crime scene photos, including the ones with the trajectory rods attached to the Paulhus steering wheel before LE destroyed the steering wheel, passenger headrest and passenger door panel, while failing to conduct any trajectory analysis.
3. All witness statements conducted by Chris Peach or any other LE involved in any investigations, including those employed by your office, Department of Safety, etc, etc.
4. Access to view and photograph all remaining evidence.
5. Access to analyse Michael Paulhus' clothing.
6. The use of force complaint and investigation against Office Michael Fateux.
7. Senior AG Simon Brown's report and any and all AG filings as contemplated (and directly identified by Court reference) by this post about my discussion with Nashua Telegraph's Kevin Landrigan.

8. Bruce McKay's clothing, subject to the same conditions noted in item 9, infra. You have to have maintained it because Bruce fired his gun to create the windshield bullet, as you say because Floyd didn't shoot at Liko until he was allegedly talking to him at carside. See Peter Heed's AG "Officer Deadly Force Protocol" Section IV Policy E(9)(e).
9. Also, I'll need Liko Kenney's clothing for analysis. It will be analysed by a forensic expert and chain of custody maintained. Update: I know the State didn't give it to the Kenney family 'cos Davey Kenney just told me so. Here's what The forensic expert said in Paulhus: "The clothing of Mr. Paulhus was apparently never collected. Had the shirt been collected it may have assisted in establishing muzzle-to-target range."
10. A copy of any and all of your investigative files or toxicology reports in which the clothing of Liko Kenney or Bruce McKay was analysed in any way.

11. A copy of any and all form letters sent to juveniles, their parents or counsel compelling said juveniles to issue DNA samples per RSA 651-C. It's letter DJJS FS Form 004. And you know the bill, it's the one that Kelly cried about in the Union Leader when the legislature didn't expand to include nonviolent juveniles, and they tried to slide them in at the last minute. Yah, those form letters. NH blogger Jonathan Melle has a bit on this in his "On Politics" blog, including a copy of Kelly crying, and I'll have more to come.

See you in Court.
PS: Here's the Michael Paulhus investigative file by Paul Erwin Kish, proving that Nashua PD and/or State Police destroyed relevant evidence, read this post for a Kelly Ayotte's true history.

From the Paulhus "investigation" here is forensic specialist Paul Erwin Kish:

3 comments:

Christopher King said...

The Topix trolls have finally figured out that by not posting comments here it keeps the weight down of any particular posting.

I like it either way, nice and clean without irrelevant banter and ad hominem arguments, or with more Internet weight.

The bottom line is that no matter what they say, Nashua and Franconia PD and State LE have intentionally violated sound principles of Law Enforcement, Kelly Ayotte lets it slide and Governor Lynch provides a stamp of imprimatur.

The Cause of Justice be damned.

Anonymous said...

That is the very sad truth !

KOKO Chris, doing a great work.

Christopher King said...

Taking the government at its word -- always a dangerous thing to do, especially in NH, it looks like no clothing analysis was done and they are saying clothing is not subject to right-to-know.

Items 8-9 were the clothing worn my Liko Kenney and Bruce McKay

It's All Good because now we see that they have the ability to conduct these tests but never did, or still will not, all of which will be presented in the U.S. House Complaint.

The other item of BS is the allegation that the Michael Paulhus investigation is somehow still open, even though the civil and criminal cases have been concluded more than a year ago.

I reckon that will remain "open" for the next 100 years or so. It's pure BS so at oral argument I'll note it for the record and at a minimum Kelly and her minions will have to tell the court approximately when they think they might be done "investigating." In reality they never investigated anything, just destroyed all of the evidence and failed to conduct any trajectory analysis just as with the windshield bullet in Liko Kenney's Supra.

Not to mention the adjudicated Miranda violations, with Nashua LE posing as AG office representatives, apparently without a shred of disciplinary repercussions from Kelly.

*********

Good Afternoon Mr. King:

I apologize for the delay in getting back to you. After your email of October 6, I uncovered that the Department of Safety may have some documents with regards to Paulhus. I will respond to your numbered requests as follows:


1. The Department does not have any documents responsive to this request.
2. The Department does have crime scene photographs, however, because the investigation is open, I am unable to release them at this time.
3. I have researched this request and have found 12 documents (13 pages) that are responsive to your request and open for inspection. The remainder of the documents that I identified as responsive are not subject to release as the investigation is still active.
4. The Department does have evidence in the Paulhus matter, however, physical evidence is not subject to the Right to Know law.
5. Please see response in 4 above.
6. The Department does not have any documents responsive to this request.
7. The Department does not have any documents responsive to this request.
8. The Department does have certain items of clothing into evidence, however, physical evidence is not subject to the Right to Know law.
9. Please see response in 5 above.
10. The Department does not have any documents responsive to this request.
11. The Department does not have any documents responsive to this request.



Production cost is $1 per page, or $13 total. Upon receipt of a check in the amount of $13, I will be happy to release the documents to you. Please make the check payable to “Treasurer, State of New Hampshire ” and remit to my attention. In the alternative, if you wish to view the documents, please contact my office to arrange a mutually convenient time.

Regards,

Marta Modigliani, Esq.