30 August 2008

Vote KingCast for Senate as RSA 91-A Right-to-Know Defendant Martha McLeod ignores her certified mail.

This is epic. Package #7007 3020 0001 6051 6691, attempted delivery on 7-5, 7-14, 7-21 came back to Boston on 29 August. We know she's likely around the State House because she's involved in a new election and winding down her office and besides, what responsible State Rep ignores her mail for the better part of a month?

That's all right, I'll forward it to her home address of 348 Wells road, Franconia NH 03580-5157. And when the Merrimack Sheriff delivers a copy of the Complaint to her official address she can't ignore that, and that's when the fun starts.

PS: Remember to write in Christopher King for NH Senate if you are on the Democratic ticket vs. Martha McLeod (website). You can read my position on her refusal to turn over her emails on the failed HB 1428 Bruce McKay Highway in Grafton County 08-E-192.


Christopher King said...

Time to feed the trools, including Sasquatch and her lover, the Quiet Man (a/k/a/ the Cowardly Lion of the Mountains).


"So, go back to popping your girlfriend’s ass pimples and have a nice night.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:46 PM




[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. King (2002), 95 Ohio St.3d 93.]

Attorneys at law --

MISCONDUCT -- One-year suspension

with credit for time
served -- Failing to fulfill purpose of mentorship imposed at previous
disciplinary proceeding -- Engaging in conduct indicating inability to
function as a professional lawyer in a courtroom or afford clients
adequate representation -- Failure to pay costs imposed at previous
disciplinary proceeding.
(No. 98-423 -- Submitted January 8, 2002 -- Decided April 24, 2002.)
ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and
Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 96-115.

Per Curiam. In December 1998, for conduct in January 1996, we
suspended Christopher King, now of Dallas, Texas, Attorney Registration No.
0062199, from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, but stayed the suspension
on the condition that during that year he be placed on probation and work with a
mentor appointed by the relator, Columbus Bar Association. Columbus Bar Assn.
v. King (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 174, 702 N.E.2d 862. We also imposed costs of
that proceeding on respondent.

On February 19, 1999, relator appointed Guy L. Reese II, a former
Franklin County Municipal Court Judge and a former Franklin County Common
Pleas Court Judge, to be respondent's mentor. Based upon the mentor's report to
the relator and respondent's failure to make the payment ordered in our December
1998 order, relator requested on September 13, 2000, that respondent's probation
be revoked, that his stayed suspension be reinstated, and that respondent be held
in contempt. Respondent opposed this request, and the matter was heard by a

panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the
Supreme Court.

At a hearing on June 6, 2001, the panel considered testimony, exhibits,
and stipulations. It received evidence that on January 9, 1998, Judge David Cain
of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas imposed a Civ.R. 11 sanction on
respondent in the amount of $5,000 to be paid in thirty days for frivolous
behavior in continuing to pursue an action despite his client's own
acknowledgement that she had no claim. Respondent did not appeal the order or
pay the sanction. Instead, he wrote a letter to the judge and filed suit against him.
The panel received evidence that on September 9, 1998, Judge Edmund A.
Sargus, Jr., of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
fined respondent $1,500 in attorney fees and $1,311.73 in costs for his conduct in
Lampley v. Vagnier (1998), No. C2-96-337. Respondent did not appeal this
sanction or two others in the same case that totaled $5,139, nor did he pay them,
except for possibly $300 of the attorney fees. On February 28, 2000, Judge
Sargus ordered respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be held
in contempt for failure to pay the sanctions.

The panel also received evidence that on February 11, 1999, Judge
Algenon L. Marbley of the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Ohio held respondent in contempt for the manner in which he comported
himself in Belcher v. Ohio Dept. Human Serv., (S.D.Ohio 1999), 48 F.Supp.3d
729, and ordered him to complete a six-week preceptorship with Professor
Shirley Mays of the Capital University Law School. Respondent did not at any
time comply with the requirements of the preceptorship.

The panel received further evidence that on July 7, 1999, Visiting Judge
John Martin of the Franklin County Common Pleas Court held respondent in
contempt and granted a mistrial due to respondent's conduct in Smith v.
Professional Cellular Serv., Inc., No. 95CVH-12-8949, and ordered him to pay

January Term, 2002
attorney fees and court costs. Respondent instead filed a complaint against Judge

In addition, the panel received evidence that respondent informed his
monitor, Judge Reese, that additional sanctions had been imposed against him of
$1,852.50 by Judge David Cain in Oglesby v. Columbus, Franklin C.P. No. 97-
CVC-03-3823, of $2,077.59 by Judge Nodine Miller of the Franklin County
Common Pleas Court in Hamm v. Gahanna City Council, No. 95CVF085484, of
$200 by Judge Cain in Michael v. Whitehall, No. 97CVC012333, and of $1,000
by Judge James L. Graham of the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Ohio in Archer v. Roman, No. C-2-95-1187.

On the basis of this evidence the panel found that respondent had not
fulfilled the purpose of his mentorship and that his conduct indicated that he
could neither function as a professional lawyer in a courtroom nor afford his
clients adequate representation.

In addition, the panel further found that respondent had not paid the costs
imposed in our December 1998 order. The panel recommended that respondent's
probation be terminated and that his suspension from the practice of law be

We have reviewed the record and adopt the findings of the panel. It is
clear from the numerous sanctions that respondent received during his term of
probation for his conduct in several courts, sanctions that remain unpaid, that the
mentor's report is credible. Further, in three years respondent has not paid the
costs we imposed in December 1998, costs that we ordered paid within ninety

We have already revoked respondent's probation and reinstated his
suspension on October 4, 2001, "pending entry of a final order by this court." 93
Ohio St.3d 1438, 755 N.E.2d 901. Respondent is hereby suspended from the
practice of law for one year with credit for time served. Respondent is further

ordered to pay the costs of the original proceeding in the amount of $1,363.71
plus interest of ten percent from March 8, 1999 until paid. Respondent shall
further pay the costs of these proceedings.
Judgment accordingly.


By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:52 PM

4:52 AM
Blogger Christopher King said...

And then my standard response from this post, in which one may click on all the links for clarification:


To the new and uninitiated:

Did you notice that NONE OF THIS has anything to do with what Caleb Macaulay said, or the lies that Kelly set forth?

Or the missing two (2) minutes of audio?

1. The fact of the matter is (again) that no one else in Ohio had got LE found liable for making someone a victim of violent crime.

2. $58,500.00 in 1998 dollars is more than reasonable for the fact that Michael had no palpable injury. Ask any lawyer.

3. Not only did we prevail on the settlement, we also won the criminal trials (the usual resisting arrest/assault on an Officer BS like they ran against Liko Kenney) before an all-white jury in Hamilton, Ohio, as the jury foreman told me part of the reason they voted for Michael and Justice was because I was better than Sam Boorst "you got more honey than his vinegar," was his EXACT quote.


4. There was no "wiretap," it was a phone recording on a speaker phone and it was not unethical or illegal because

a) Ohio had not adopted the model ABA rules.

b) Ohio was a one-party state, meaning only one party needs to know who is taping.

This is why they couldn't suspend me so instead they put me on "probation" for a year and I reported to a ex-military lawyer who at the end said I failed to fulfill the terms of my probation, so NOW I'm suspended. When asked in my suspension hearing what I failed to do that he wanted me to do, he had no answer.

And BTW one can see Mr. Isreal at my suspension hearing arguing in my defense.

And BTW we were attacking the same kind of racism that caused Peckett's to be closed when the government found that they would not accommodate black folks so rather than to follow the government order to desegregate, they closed the inn!

The landlord had called my client a "nigger lover," which I validated by neutral sources.

Anyway, on Pecketts, I know a guy that burned it down in a training exercise.

5. Now then, coming to the biggest joke of them all, the "extortion" case against me was DISMISSED in its entirety, along with the bogus "Unauthorized Practice of Law" case brought by Kelly.

Here is a summation post, showing the Demand Letter I sent to Chief Dunn after his cops stuck 3 guns in an unarmed man's face and visual body cavity searched him for loitering.

Yes, loitering. He won his criminal "case" without a lawyer, yes he did.

a) Police Chief Dunn fired.
b) Prosecutor Bill Albrecht resigns under an ethics investigation.
c) NAACP's Gloria Timmons and Jaffrey Chief Dunn both lied under Oath.
d) Nashua Telegraph and Mayor Streeter wrote editorial in favor of KingCast and gave me a Mayoral Commendation.

Thanks for bringing that up though so that people can see how foul the government and some "Civil Rights" organizations can be.

But what you failed to do my friend, is to offer any comment about what YOU have done for Civil Rights, or Right-to-Know.

Here's a good post from Daily Kos about today's NAACP:

"...I like your style, even if it's intemperate, it's creative intemperateness. I like that you touched on the way in which hallowed institutions from the civil rights era like NAACP are subject to intense pressures from those outside the organization who wish to subvert the "brand" from within. In this way, legacy institutions end up perverted and co-opted, since at the end of the day all organizations have to be run by real people in real time, in the present moment. If they don't take steps to energetically preserve and adapt their mission to changing times, it's like taking a cruise on the Queen Mary while she sits in dry dock. It's pretty, but you're not getting anywhere."


Lastly, you know what's funny?

I talk to people who have spoken with Casey Sherman about this matter, one of whom went to prep school with Casey.

He is a well-respected writer even as acknowledged by the same circle jerk trolls at Topix (where Casey no longer reads BTW) and I know that Casey is making some of the exact same points as I am. So when he publishes his book next year what will the trolls say then?

North Country folks will not be fooled by these trolls, I only bothered to respond because newbies might have some questions.

-The KingCaster

6:24 AM

4:55 AM

11:48 AM


KingCast: Telling the Truth about public officials since Ken Blackwell in 1989.

Anonymous said...

Good to know Martha has a website.

I will be there to visit and let her know she is in the wrong profession.

Maybe you can attempt to send the certified letter to her campaign manager.

Let us see what he is made of........

JP said...

Refusal of certified mail in many states will be viewed as the documents being served. And I believe in ALL states they will be considered served if the eveidence shows they knew or should have known what the contents contained. i.e. you also sent via normal mail or you posted this on websites and sent email.

JP said...

RE: By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:46 PM

Can we stop with the BS attacks of Chris' past?? Can we just block these messages or have them rerouted to some other board where people who want to read them can read them? We have all heard about this crap enough.

EVERY SINGLE person who fights the government is going to end up in these kinds of situations and any mistakes or wrong doing in the past has NOTHING to do with these issues. You can make the stretch only of saying, should we trust Chris but this is BS because this is a blog and for OPINIONS not to mention the facts he brings up are accomponied by documents and half the poit of this entire issue is a search for the truth and looking for a justice through legal means. Chris could be the biggest liar in the world but this will all come out in the laundry as he pursues this case(s).

So by attacking and trying to discredit him, you simply and clearly are doing all you can to prevent the truth from coming out.

But the real bottom line is that repeating this same crap over and over and over again is a waste of time for 99.9% of the people who visit this web site. I first heard about this crap when I first came to this web site and heard about it through Chris' post. He is not trying to hide anything but the fact is those issues have NOTHING to do with this page and can be found elsewhere where Chris already spent his time and made his case and comments about these past issues.

FINALLY - what a punk you are to not posy who you are. Until you hold yourself up to be examined and stop hiding in the closet then you have ZERO credibility and NONE of what you say should be considered because you are holding Chris to a level you are not willing to hold yourself ... most people call this being a PUNK.

Christopher King said...


Yep, I've taken to posting the Ohio suspension stuff myself to take the wind out of their sails.

Put simply, there is no other place in the World where anyone can find as much substantive review of the facts of this case -- supported by the government's own documents -- than right smack here.

That's the way it always has been and that is the way it's always going to be.



Christopher King said...


Not to mention this next round of litigation is going to be very focused and very intense.

There are some extremely compelling Constitutional and legislative issues that have to be addressed and by golly I look forward to so doing.

And I don't ultimately give a damn what anybody thinks. If you dig it, that's cool, if you don't that's cool too.

Liko's family and many many people in North Country dig it. The day they stop digging it is the day I consider ending my pursuit of the Truth and open government.

Haters don't hold yer stankin' Sasquatch breath on that one.

-The KingCaster

Anonymous said...

response to JP

Great post(s) !

To the King bashers, please share with the rest of us what you have done to make the world a better place ?????

Anonymous said...

FINALLY - what a punk you are to not posy who you are. Until you hold yourself up to be examined and stop hiding in the closet then you have ZERO credibility and NONE of what you say should be considered because you are holding Chris to a level you are not willing to hold yourself ... most people call this being a PUNK.

Back at ya, JP

Christopher King said...

To all:

I put myself on the line for this case as soon as I started gathering facts because I knew something just was not right.

As time has taken on, and more facts have been revealed, I am more confident than ever that someone with the authority to review this situation will come forward to prevent an ongoing, manifest travesty of Justice.

The day Kelly handed out the press packets with no opportunity for questions and answers was very telling.


JP said...

Re: Anonymous said...

Are you really this ignorant? "back at ya" ???????

Please show me where I am digging up anyone's past to try to discredit them or am holding up myself as an authority on anything???

You are bashing somebody who has spent an enourmous amout of time (this cannot being argued) searching for the truth and facts (have yet to hear anyone provide anything to the contrary) about this case.

Yet you are digging up things from his past. Why?? What does it have to do with this case or his motives in this situation.

What if his motives were to make money? So, does that mean the facts are no longer the facts? So, what if he made slight mistakes in the passed at what I believe was a fairly new job by being over zelous in his convictions?

The bottom line is you brought up his past as though it is relevant. So shouldn't yours?

There is nobody whose past when presented in the worst lite as you have done with his is not going to have some flaws.

What would you like to know about me? Is my arrest record relevant? Is my salary, job title, marriage status? What possible relevants does my past have to do with anything here?

Now dumb-ass, you have thrown stones and held somebody up to a level of scruntiny that you will hold yourself ... remember the word "PUNK"

But forget about that, your stupidity goes beyond your being a punk and I don't have to know your past to see your ignorance. I only need to look at the lack of logic in your posts.

Christopher King said...


Oh, yah I've got my share of haters, no doubt about it. Thing is, they have only made me stronger.

I remember back in the day in Columbus when the NAACP hated me and many of their associated lawyers tried to get the Gregory Boatwright case (just run his name and the word "nigger" in the search window) from me after the discovery in the case showed up that I was right.

He told them all to go to hell because they weren't there for him in the first place, and he and I developed a nice client relationship and friendship and got him a nice settlement.

I'm not in this to be "popular." I'm in this to get to the Truth, and I don't give a damn what kind of opposition I face.

Especially from the cowardly lion and Sasquatch.

-The KingCaster.

Anonymous said...

"FINALLY - what a punk you are to not posy who you are."

Who are you, JP?