27 August 2008

KingCast says surprise, surprise, NH AG Kelly Ayotte rules Anthony Jarvis shooting "justified."

Here's the reason why Kelly won't raid Gregory W. Floyd's house for guns, even though she should because his old guns are not accounted for.

Here's the UL Jarvis story.

Here's how Kelly "investigated" the Franconia shooting tragedy. Give me a barf bag. I'm out for a bike ride.

'Late.
*******
Okay, it is later. The ride was nice. Time for more thoughts.

1. We cannot assume that the shooting (22 bullets I think) was justified because we cannot trust Kelly Ayotte to tell the truth or to display any sort of respect for the Law. Witness her slap in the face to the presiding judge in the Michael Addison case, in which the Court clearly ruled that NH LE violated his Civil Rights on Miranda. Ayotte stupidly and arrogantly stated that they did nothing wrong.

2. What's next, is she going to give a pass to the cops who shot each other at the Concord Credit Union at 4:30 a.m. when they weren't even supposed to be there? You're never supposed to point your gun at another officer. I look forward to viewing the RSA 91-A materials I requested on both the Jarvis and the Credit Union cases.

14 comments:

Christopher King said...

Okay, this is the part where I save time for the Trolls by just cutting and pasting their comments :)

********

"So, go back to popping your girlfriend’s ass pimples and have a nice night.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:46 PM
*

THE REAL CHRISTOPHER KING -

BELIEVE NOTHING HE SAYS BECAUSE HE IS A LIAR AND A DISCREDITED ATTORNEY - WITHOUT THE PROPER ETHICS, HE IS NOTHING - LET IT BE SAID ------


COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. KING.

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. King (2002), 95 Ohio St.3d 93.]

Attorneys at law --

MISCONDUCT -- One-year suspension

with credit for time
served -- Failing to fulfill purpose of mentorship imposed at previous
disciplinary proceeding -- Engaging in conduct indicating inability to
function as a professional lawyer in a courtroom or afford clients
adequate representation -- Failure to pay costs imposed at previous
disciplinary proceeding.
(No. 98-423 -- Submitted January 8, 2002 -- Decided April 24, 2002.)
ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and
Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 96-115.
__________________

Per Curiam. In December 1998, for conduct in January 1996, we
suspended Christopher King, now of Dallas, Texas, Attorney Registration No.
0062199, from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, but stayed the suspension
on the condition that during that year he be placed on probation and work with a
mentor appointed by the relator, Columbus Bar Association. Columbus Bar Assn.
v. King (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 174, 702 N.E.2d 862. We also imposed costs of
that proceeding on respondent.

On February 19, 1999, relator appointed Guy L. Reese II, a former
Franklin County Municipal Court Judge and a former Franklin County Common
Pleas Court Judge, to be respondent's mentor. Based upon the mentor's report to
the relator and respondent's failure to make the payment ordered in our December
1998 order, relator requested on September 13, 2000, that respondent's probation
be revoked, that his stayed suspension be reinstated, and that respondent be held
in contempt. Respondent opposed this request, and the matter was heard by a

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the
Supreme Court.

At a hearing on June 6, 2001, the panel considered testimony, exhibits,
and stipulations. It received evidence that on January 9, 1998, Judge David Cain
of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas imposed a Civ.R. 11 sanction on
respondent in the amount of $5,000 to be paid in thirty days for frivolous
behavior in continuing to pursue an action despite his client's own
acknowledgement that she had no claim. Respondent did not appeal the order or
pay the sanction. Instead, he wrote a letter to the judge and filed suit against him.
The panel received evidence that on September 9, 1998, Judge Edmund A.
Sargus, Jr., of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
fined respondent $1,500 in attorney fees and $1,311.73 in costs for his conduct in
Lampley v. Vagnier (1998), No. C2-96-337. Respondent did not appeal this
sanction or two others in the same case that totaled $5,139, nor did he pay them,
except for possibly $300 of the attorney fees. On February 28, 2000, Judge
Sargus ordered respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be held
in contempt for failure to pay the sanctions.

The panel also received evidence that on February 11, 1999, Judge
Algenon L. Marbley of the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Ohio held respondent in contempt for the manner in which he comported
himself in Belcher v. Ohio Dept. Human Serv., (S.D.Ohio 1999), 48 F.Supp.3d
729, and ordered him to complete a six-week preceptorship with Professor
Shirley Mays of the Capital University Law School. Respondent did not at any
time comply with the requirements of the preceptorship.

The panel received further evidence that on July 7, 1999, Visiting Judge
John Martin of the Franklin County Common Pleas Court held respondent in
contempt and granted a mistrial due to respondent's conduct in Smith v.
Professional Cellular Serv., Inc., No. 95CVH-12-8949, and ordered him to pay
2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
January Term, 2002
attorney fees and court costs. Respondent instead filed a complaint against Judge
Martin.

In addition, the panel received evidence that respondent informed his
monitor, Judge Reese, that additional sanctions had been imposed against him of
$1,852.50 by Judge David Cain in Oglesby v. Columbus, Franklin C.P. No. 97-
CVC-03-3823, of $2,077.59 by Judge Nodine Miller of the Franklin County
Common Pleas Court in Hamm v. Gahanna City Council, No. 95CVF085484, of
$200 by Judge Cain in Michael v. Whitehall, No. 97CVC012333, and of $1,000
by Judge James L. Graham of the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Ohio in Archer v. Roman, No. C-2-95-1187.

On the basis of this evidence the panel found that respondent had not
fulfilled the purpose of his mentorship and that his conduct indicated that he
could neither function as a professional lawyer in a courtroom nor afford his
clients adequate representation.

In addition, the panel further found that respondent had not paid the costs
imposed in our December 1998 order. The panel recommended that respondent's
probation be terminated and that his suspension from the practice of law be
reinstated.

We have reviewed the record and adopt the findings of the panel. It is
clear from the numerous sanctions that respondent received during his term of
probation for his conduct in several courts, sanctions that remain unpaid, that the
mentor's report is credible. Further, in three years respondent has not paid the
costs we imposed in December 1998, costs that we ordered paid within ninety
days.

We have already revoked respondent's probation and reinstated his
suspension on October 4, 2001, "pending entry of a final order by this court." 93
Ohio St.3d 1438, 755 N.E.2d 901. Respondent is hereby suspended from the
practice of law for one year with credit for time served. Respondent is further
3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
ordered to pay the costs of the original proceeding in the amount of $1,363.71
plus interest of ten percent from March 8, 1999 until paid. Respondent shall
further pay the costs of these proceedings.
Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:52 PM

4:52 AM
Delete
Blogger Christopher King said...

And then my standard response from this post, in which one may click on all the links for clarification:

********

To the new and uninitiated:

Did you notice that NONE OF THIS has anything to do with what Caleb Macaulay said, or the lies that Kelly set forth?

Or the missing two (2) minutes of audio?


1. The fact of the matter is (again) that no one else in Ohio had got LE found liable for making someone a victim of violent crime.

2. $58,500.00 in 1998 dollars is more than reasonable for the fact that Michael had no palpable injury. Ask any lawyer.

3. Not only did we prevail on the settlement, we also won the criminal trials (the usual resisting arrest/assault on an Officer BS like they ran against Liko Kenney) before an all-white jury in Hamilton, Ohio, as the jury foreman told me part of the reason they voted for Michael and Justice was because I was better than Sam Boorst "you got more honey than his vinegar," was his EXACT quote.

*****

4. There was no "wiretap," it was a phone recording on a speaker phone and it was not unethical or illegal because

a) Ohio had not adopted the model ABA rules.

b) Ohio was a one-party state, meaning only one party needs to know who is taping.

This is why they couldn't suspend me so instead they put me on "probation" for a year and I reported to a ex-military lawyer who at the end said I failed to fulfill the terms of my probation, so NOW I'm suspended. When asked in my suspension hearing what I failed to do that he wanted me to do, he had no answer.

And BTW one can see Mr. Isreal at my suspension hearing arguing in my defense.

And BTW we were attacking the same kind of racism that caused Peckett's to be closed when the government found that they would not accommodate black folks so rather than to follow the government order to desegregate, they closed the inn!

The landlord had called my client a "nigger lover," which I validated by neutral sources.

Anyway, on Pecketts, I know a guy that burned it down in a training exercise.

5. Now then, coming to the biggest joke of them all, the "extortion" case against me was DISMISSED in its entirety, along with the bogus "Unauthorized Practice of Law" case brought by Kelly.

Here is a summation post, showing the Demand Letter I sent to Chief Dunn after his cops stuck 3 guns in an unarmed man's face and visual body cavity searched him for loitering.

Yes, loitering. He won his criminal "case" without a lawyer, yes he did.

a) Police Chief Dunn fired.
b) Prosecutor Bill Albrecht resigns under an ethics investigation.
c) NAACP's Gloria Timmons and Jaffrey Chief Dunn both lied under Oath.
d) Nashua Telegraph and Mayor Streeter wrote editorial in favor of KingCast and gave me a Mayoral Commendation.

Thanks for bringing that up though so that people can see how foul the government and some "Civil Rights" organizations can be.

But what you failed to do my friend, is to offer any comment about what YOU have done for Civil Rights, or Right-to-Know.

Here's a good post from Daily Kos about today's NAACP:

"...I like your style, even if it's intemperate, it's creative intemperateness. I like that you touched on the way in which hallowed institutions from the civil rights era like NAACP are subject to intense pressures from those outside the organization who wish to subvert the "brand" from within. In this way, legacy institutions end up perverted and co-opted, since at the end of the day all organizations have to be run by real people in real time, in the present moment. If they don't take steps to energetically preserve and adapt their mission to changing times, it's like taking a cruise on the Queen Mary while she sits in dry dock. It's pretty, but you're not getting anywhere."

******

Lastly, you know what's funny?

I talk to people who have spoken with Casey Sherman about this matter, one of whom went to prep school with Casey.

He is a well-respected writer even as acknowledged by the same circle jerk trolls at Topix (where Casey no longer reads BTW) and I know that Casey is making some of the exact same points as I am. So when he publishes his book next year what will the trolls say then?

North Country folks will not be fooled by these trolls, I only bothered to respond because newbies might have some questions.

-The KingCaster

6:24 AM

4:55 AM

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Your wickedness affects only a man like yourself, and your righteousness only the sons of men.

Job 35:8

Anonymous said...

5:10 pm

If you read back you will see where a few words were allowed. One being "shit".

You my friend have a "potty mouth". Here is some advice, go wash it out with soap and go back under the bridge. Then STFU !

Nice work Christopher !

KOKO

Christopher King said...

Blah blah blah blah blah.

Are you the one who called me a "punk-assed bitch" at Topix Mr. Colt?

Or just someone else from your evil, vindictive powerless posse?

*********

We cannot assume that the shooting (22 bullets I think) was justified because we cannot trust Kelly Ayotte to tell the truth or to display any sort of respect for the Law. Witness her slap in the face to the presiding judge in the Michael Addison case, in which the Court clearly ruled that NH LE violated his Civil Rights on Miranda. Ayotte stupidly and arrogantly stated that they did nothing wrong.

2. What's next, is she going to give a pass to the cops who shot each other at the Concord Credit Union at 4:30 a.m. when they weren't even supposed to be there? You're never supposed to point your gun at another officer. I look forward to viewing the RSA 91-A materials I requested on both the Jarvis and the Credit Union cases.

Anonymous said...

A bit off-topic for this post, but a couple observations/comments on the upcoming Sept 9 state primary voting and Nov State elections.

1. On the Democratic primary ballot, only McLeod's name is there for State Senate candidate. I think it would be a hoot to write in Chris King, as they have to publish this info...how embarassing, especially if he got several write-ins. I plan on utilizing the "write-in" option of the ballot, just to send a message.

2. There is a Huge Gallus sign on Rte 18. Must absolutely kill the McLeods to see that. The only McLeod signs I've seen are on their Wells Rd property although I'm sure there are more to be seen.

Ok, back to the regularly sheduled program.

Christopher King said...

5:10

You dropped the f-bomb so I yanked your post.

But thanks for noting that there was profanity on the cover page; I made sure to change that 4ya!

7:07

That's hootlarious. I will definitely encourage folks to write my name in. What will be even funnier is when she loses the election by the number of votes that I receive.

Her arrogance in refusing to turn over emails is almost as astounding as the Legislature's belief that withholding such emails is actually lawful.

Anonymous said...

Yes, a write in isn't throwing your vote away as this is a primary and she is unopposed. Actually, a vote for her IS throwing away your vote (and your voice). Doesn't have to be King, heck, write in Gallus or any non-fictional person if you want to. A message needs to be sent.

Christopher King said...

7:26

You'll get a kick out of this post.

-c

Anonymous said...

Dude - you actually think you know everything about every topic. Without so much as a news article your willing to spout off with legal opinions. You really are a moron.

Christopher King said...

7:52

Dude, I know enough to know that LE can do no wrong in NH.

Take a look.

And in fact I do know everything about everything.

Ask Jeeves.

Anonymous said...

My vote will be for "Bossie" the cow. She has served the public and has done so with honesty and integrity.

Her morals and ethics were very much intact and to this day although not present on earth she remains well respected and loved.

As a little one stated to me several weeks ago.....

" I am very sad for Liko and his parents. At least he and Bossie are together in hevan playing "

Anonymous said...

Martha has proven herself unworthy of my vote.

Christopher King said...

11:12

Certified Mail 7007 3020 0001 6051 6691

KingCast letter to Martha McLeod she refused to pick it up at the State House 3 times so the mailman walks up to me today (I'm sitting outside on the stoop blogging the Gloucester case) and I'm like, wow, what a jerk she is.

7-5
7-14
7-21


Take a look at what's been going on in Gloucester Mass with respect to the Lorraine Fire.

-c