24 August 2008

KingCast says Dow murders and other LE malfeasance continue to haunt NH Gov. John Lynch and NH AG Kelly Ayotte

Let's get one thing straight:

Former NH LE Richard Dow almost assuredly murdered his wife Jan and adoptive son Steven 25 years ago, and he got away with it in 24 hours. As such, Karen Saffian, ex fiancee of Richard Dow -- and Dow Murders website owner -- emailed me to help her circulate a series of letters about the ongoing willful inefficacies of NH Law Enforcement.

They are linked here at Scribd.com (tomorrow but the first one is in the comments).
Governor Lynch One.
Governor Lynch Two.
Governor Lynch Three.
Governor Lynch Four.

And let's not forget the deep-seated problems currently manifest by the $1M lawsuit against NH AG Kelly Ayotte, as filed by Sgt. Carey Carlberg Jr.

Let's get another thing straight:


Gregory W. Floyd got away in 24 hours with almost assuredly murdering Liko Kenney. This was after Floyd watched Bruce McKay violently violate 8 pursuit and OC Spray policies before Liko Kenney shot McKay out of fear. According to Floyd's own son at Ayotte investigative file pdf 745, Floyd started shooting at Liko Kenney and Caleb Macaulay BEFORE Liko's car ever struck Bruce McKay.

Not to mention the missing two (2) whole minutes of Dispatch air time 6:07:24 – 6:09:15 when Bruce McKay was incommunicado. We need to hear that. NH AG Kelly Ayotte owes it to the public.

And let's get a third thing straight:


Governor Lynch has ignored a number of well-written letters from people concerned about the North Country and the lack of integrity witnessed in Kelly Ayotte's bogus 24-hr."investigation" of the Franconia shooting tragedy. Some were even published in the Caledonian Record. Let's hope he changes course and acts responsibly.

And let's get the fourth thing straight:


KingCast v. McLeod et al., 08-E-192.

14 comments:

Christopher King said...

REFERENCE:

JOHN BARTHELMES, COMMISSIONER OF SAFETY
KELLY AYOTTE. ATTORNEY GENERAL
LOUIS COPPONI, SERGEANT, NHSP
KEVIN O’BRIEN, CHIEF OF POLICY AND PLANNING, DOS
WILLIAM MAGEE, LIEUTENANT, NHSP
OTHERS YET TO BE NAMED




THE DOW MURDERS and THE CARLBERG CASE

INTRODUCTION

=====================================================================

Karen Saffian
karensaffian@yahoo.com
(603) 582-9888

August 1, 2008

Office of the Governor
The Honorable John Lynch
State House
25 Capitol Street
Concord, NH 03301

Dear Governor Lynch,

In January of 2005 and in 2007 you were sworn in as our Governor. Today, once more, you are running for office. You promised you would exercise leadership “ to make real progress on issues important to New Hampshire families [such as] ensuring public safety.” [1]

There are truths that need to be heard, that need to be recognized and addressed - truths that fall within the realm of public safety.

Awareness needs to be raised regarding compromising official conduct that has occurred in conjunction with the overwhelming lack of accountability that exists within the State of New Hampshire.

This letter serves as an introduction to two well known Public Safety Cases that need to be brought into the public consciousness. Further dismissal of the issues inherent in these two cases will only result in additional and devastating injury to residents and law enforcement officials alike.

As your awareness increases regarding compromising official conduct that has taken place by the above named officials you will need to personally decide whether to honor truth and impose accountability or participate in deceitfulness and promote wrongdoing.

Following is an introduction into the two cases referenced at the top of this letter:


1. THE DOW MURDERS (www.dowmurders.com)


Many, including yourself, are familiar with this specific case.

It is a case that has been stonewalled, misrepresented, obstructed and buried by those who have taken an oath to uphold both our state and national constitutions, by those who have been entrusted to enforce our laws in an unbiased and just manner, by those who are our state leaders.

It is a case that involves a double murder. The victims a New Hampshire mother and son. The prime suspect a former New Hampshire State Trooper.

Complaints identifying misfeasance and malfeasance by officers of the Department of Safety and recurring deceitfulness by New Hampshire State Troopers were brought forward and will be discussed in future communications.


2. THE CARLBERG CASE (No. 08-CV-230-PB)

Another high profile case which you, Governor Lynch, will recognize as well.

William “Carey” Carlberg, Jr. is a former New Hampshire State Trooper who recently filed a federal complaint against the Department of Safety; the Commissioner of Safety John Barthelmes; Attorney General Kelly Ayotte; Sergeant Louis Copponi NHSP; Honorable Kenneth McHugh; and John Does 1- 10. This federal complaint was borne out of a state case that was brought against Mr. Carlberg by the New Hampshire Troopers Association.

The Carlberg Case centers on violations of our First and Fourteenth Constitutional Amendments, USERRA violations, and an Executive Order that you, Governor Lynch, issued and signed on September 7, 2005 (NH Governor John H. Lynch’s Executive Order number 2005-5).

Complaints identifying inefficiencies, misfeasance, and malfeasance by officers of the Department of Safety and recurring deceitfulness by New Hampshire State Troopers were also brought forward in this case and will be discussed in future communications.

The Dow and Carlberg cases have much in common. There are other cases as well.

Truth is always found in the details. Those details need to be brought into the light of day to be examined, understood and responded to in such a way that is empowering, illuminating, and beneficial for the residents of the State of New Hampshire.
It is vitally important to have these details open to all people as it pertains to the welfare and well-being of the community at large as well as to the community of law enforcement.

In my next letter the process of bringing forth background information pertaining to these two cases will start.

It is appropriate to close this first letter with your words. "People want a Governor who is standing up for them and delivering real results.” [2]


Respectfully,

Karen Saffian

cc: NH Representatives
NH Senators
US Representatives
US Senators
NH Residents
Media
Law Firms
Interested Parties








1 State of New Hampshire Website: http://www.nh.gov/governor/biography/index.htm
2 John Lynch for Governor: http://www.lynchcommittee.com/release_details.asp?id=12

Christopher King said...

And before the Internet troll pops up and says "well what about being suspended or disbarred for not paying court costs," I'll just remind you that one may be a convicted felon and serve jail time and still get a license back to practice law.

Michael McLauglin.

Given the Good Deeds that I have accomplished over the past several years I'll be discussing this matter with the Ohio Bar in the next few months.

-The KingCaster.

Anonymous said...

interesting to look at King's own litany of criminality. No opinions or chatting. Just the facts straight from the Supreme Court.

http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/ro...1-ohio- 4642.pdf

http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/ro...98-ohio- 528.pdf

http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/Co.../ suspension.asp

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/sc...=980423& invol=1
983-423. Columbus Bar Assn. v. King.

"IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondent, Christopher King, immediately cease and desist from the practice of law in any form and is hereby forbidden to appear on behalf of another before any court, judge, commission, board, administrative agency, or other public authority."

"IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the respondent is hereby forbidden to counsel or advise or prepare legal instruments for others or in any manner perform such services."

"It is further order that the respondent immediately cease and desist from the practice of law in any form.... "

And there is very much more, all of it very explicit, straight from Panels of Supreme Court judges coming down on his lying ass.

For those interested in taking a quick look at those links, you will notice that he has continually broken the orders of the Court.

It is Fascinating reading and will only take the shortest time to peruse.

He will not ever stand up in any court ever again, except as a defendant. He is busted and the local (and state) politicians (and Judges have been made aware of this criminality.

They already consider him a stalker and his threats against polititians are overtly violent. No wonder Huff fired him after only two blogs. The guy is evil.

He was a clerk for less than two years, then went into private practice and was suspended for wiretaps, lies and other criminality almost immediately.

It took him to age 30 to become a lawyer, and two years later he was suspended with many sanctions. And a drifer ever since, though he claims his superman exploits in every field imaginable in his vanity web site.

What a brilliant career.

He got a job as a clerk for the NAACP, then wrote an extortion letter to the Jaffrey police signed ESQ, without the knowledge of his superiors. He found a guy who was popped for drunk and disorderly who NEVER CLAIMED AN INJURY and NEVER FILED A REPORT of any kind. King approached him with the promise of big bucks (minus King's percentage of course.

He was fired from the NAACP. His reputation is ruined for any kind of meaningful job forever into the future.

He threatens WMUR and ABC News and many other media outlets, local and national, thus assuring that he is not even allowed to comment on a story as any member of the general public can.
LOSER. Latch onto him if you want to LOSE big.

He was fired for snorting or smoking something at the Hyatt Regency; not being able to make the cut as a waiter. As a crackhead though, he is perfect.
He was fired from several other waiter jobs and other kinds of jobs.

A drifter with a vanity blog full of lies and fancy dances.

He claims a major motion picture studio wants to do a bio-pic on him, (for years on end)...he claims to have a 'biographer' writing his life story, and he claims that he should have won a Pulitzer.
I don't know if he'll end up in jail or a mental hospital but either way, he's going the rest of the way down.
By his own lying hand.

He'll be 44 and hasn't been able to practice "law" for over ten years.
And never will again, tho he advertises here to 'help' people write writs and such. AND has consistently signed ESQ. to his disgraced criminal name.

A life long loser with a big mouth and many a fancy cover story, like a kid explaining how he didn't really steal the cookies when there is crumbs on his face and hands.
a metaphysical reductionist indeed.
More like a disgraced disbarred lawyer and a phony carny barker.

His subject matters don't even matter anymore. It's all about James Bond exploits and homages to his own brilliance.
Human Puke, and it's been proved right here on this comment thread over and over and over.

He whines and screams and begs working people for rides and tires and money and feels mighty sorry for himself, as losers do.
allan | 07.29.08 - 5:48 pm | #

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/truecrimeweblog/3224457556883736229/

Anonymous said...

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/truecrimeweblog/
3224457556883736229/

Anonymous said...

Why is it some lawyers are held accountable for their actions but not others.

Kelly, your next !

Excellent letter to the Governor !

Let us see if he takes a stand on this or continues to ignore this long standing issue of deceit and corruption within his administration and beyond.

Remember, the UL mentioned it is easy to be popular when you refuse to take a stand.

It is easy to see why certain people that work under the Governor but for the people of the State of New Hampshire are not held accountable for their unethical, unprofessional and immoral acts.

Come on Lynch, you can do it, take a stand !

Anonymous said...

THE REAL CHRISTOPHER KING -

BELIEVE NOTHING HE SAYS BECAUSE HE IS A LIAR AND A DISCREDITED ATTORNEY - WITHOUT THE PROPER ETHICS, HE IS NOTHING - LET IT BE SAID ------


COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. KING.

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. King (2002), 95 Ohio St.3d 93.]

Attorneys at law --

MISCONDUCT -- One-year suspension

with credit for time
served -- Failing to fulfill purpose of mentorship imposed at previous
disciplinary proceeding -- Engaging in conduct indicating inability to
function as a professional lawyer in a courtroom or afford clients
adequate representation -- Failure to pay costs imposed at previous
disciplinary proceeding.
(No. 98-423 -- Submitted January 8, 2002 -- Decided April 24, 2002.)
ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and
Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 96-115.
__________________

Per Curiam. In December 1998, for conduct in January 1996, we
suspended Christopher King, now of Dallas, Texas, Attorney Registration No.
0062199, from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, but stayed the suspension
on the condition that during that year he be placed on probation and work with a
mentor appointed by the relator, Columbus Bar Association. Columbus Bar Assn.
v. King (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 174, 702 N.E.2d 862. We also imposed costs of
that proceeding on respondent.

On February 19, 1999, relator appointed Guy L. Reese II, a former
Franklin County Municipal Court Judge and a former Franklin County Common
Pleas Court Judge, to be respondent's mentor. Based upon the mentor's report to
the relator and respondent's failure to make the payment ordered in our December
1998 order, relator requested on September 13, 2000, that respondent's probation
be revoked, that his stayed suspension be reinstated, and that respondent be held
in contempt. Respondent opposed this request, and the matter was heard by a

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the
Supreme Court.

At a hearing on June 6, 2001, the panel considered testimony, exhibits,
and stipulations. It received evidence that on January 9, 1998, Judge David Cain
of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas imposed a Civ.R. 11 sanction on
respondent in the amount of $5,000 to be paid in thirty days for frivolous
behavior in continuing to pursue an action despite his client's own
acknowledgement that she had no claim. Respondent did not appeal the order or
pay the sanction. Instead, he wrote a letter to the judge and filed suit against him.
The panel received evidence that on September 9, 1998, Judge Edmund A.
Sargus, Jr., of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
fined respondent $1,500 in attorney fees and $1,311.73 in costs for his conduct in
Lampley v. Vagnier (1998), No. C2-96-337. Respondent did not appeal this
sanction or two others in the same case that totaled $5,139, nor did he pay them,
except for possibly $300 of the attorney fees. On February 28, 2000, Judge
Sargus ordered respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be held
in contempt for failure to pay the sanctions.

The panel also received evidence that on February 11, 1999, Judge
Algenon L. Marbley of the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Ohio held respondent in contempt for the manner in which he comported
himself in Belcher v. Ohio Dept. Human Serv., (S.D.Ohio 1999), 48 F.Supp.3d
729, and ordered him to complete a six-week preceptorship with Professor
Shirley Mays of the Capital University Law School. Respondent did not at any
time comply with the requirements of the preceptorship.

The panel received further evidence that on July 7, 1999, Visiting Judge
John Martin of the Franklin County Common Pleas Court held respondent in
contempt and granted a mistrial due to respondent's conduct in Smith v.
Professional Cellular Serv., Inc., No. 95CVH-12-8949, and ordered him to pay
2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
January Term, 2002
attorney fees and court costs. Respondent instead filed a complaint against Judge
Martin.

In addition, the panel received evidence that respondent informed his
monitor, Judge Reese, that additional sanctions had been imposed against him of
$1,852.50 by Judge David Cain in Oglesby v. Columbus, Franklin C.P. No. 97-
CVC-03-3823, of $2,077.59 by Judge Nodine Miller of the Franklin County
Common Pleas Court in Hamm v. Gahanna City Council, No. 95CVF085484, of
$200 by Judge Cain in Michael v. Whitehall, No. 97CVC012333, and of $1,000
by Judge James L. Graham of the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Ohio in Archer v. Roman, No. C-2-95-1187.

On the basis of this evidence the panel found that respondent had not
fulfilled the purpose of his mentorship and that his conduct indicated that he
could neither function as a professional lawyer in a courtroom nor afford his
clients adequate representation.

In addition, the panel further found that respondent had not paid the costs
imposed in our December 1998 order. The panel recommended that respondent's
probation be terminated and that his suspension from the practice of law be
reinstated.

We have reviewed the record and adopt the findings of the panel. It is
clear from the numerous sanctions that respondent received during his term of
probation for his conduct in several courts, sanctions that remain unpaid, that the
mentor's report is credible. Further, in three years respondent has not paid the
costs we imposed in December 1998, costs that we ordered paid within ninety
days.

We have already revoked respondent's probation and reinstated his
suspension on October 4, 2001, "pending entry of a final order by this court." 93
Ohio St.3d 1438, 755 N.E.2d 901. Respondent is hereby suspended from the
practice of law for one year with credit for time served. Respondent is further
3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
ordered to pay the costs of the original proceeding in the amount of $1,363.71
plus interest of ten percent from March 8, 1999 until paid. Respondent shall
further pay the costs of these proceedings.
Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

Anonymous said...

THE REAL CHRISTOPHER KING -

BELIEVE NOTHING HE SAYS BECAUSE HE IS A LIAR AND A DISCREDITED ATTORNEY - WITHOUT THE PROPER ETHICS, HE IS NOTHING - LET IT BE SAID ------


COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. KING.

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. King (2002), 95 Ohio St.3d 93.]

Attorneys at law --

MISCONDUCT -- One-year suspension

with credit for time
served -- Failing to fulfill purpose of mentorship imposed at previous
disciplinary proceeding -- Engaging in conduct indicating inability to
function as a professional lawyer in a courtroom or afford clients
adequate representation -- Failure to pay costs imposed at previous
disciplinary proceeding.
(No. 98-423 -- Submitted January 8, 2002 -- Decided April 24, 2002.)
ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and
Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 96-115.
__________________

Per Curiam. In December 1998, for conduct in January 1996, we
suspended Christopher King, now of Dallas, Texas, Attorney Registration No.
0062199, from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, but stayed the suspension
on the condition that during that year he be placed on probation and work with a
mentor appointed by the relator, Columbus Bar Association. Columbus Bar Assn.
v. King (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 174, 702 N.E.2d 862. We also imposed costs of
that proceeding on respondent.

On February 19, 1999, relator appointed Guy L. Reese II, a former
Franklin County Municipal Court Judge and a former Franklin County Common
Pleas Court Judge, to be respondent's mentor. Based upon the mentor's report to
the relator and respondent's failure to make the payment ordered in our December
1998 order, relator requested on September 13, 2000, that respondent's probation
be revoked, that his stayed suspension be reinstated, and that respondent be held
in contempt. Respondent opposed this request, and the matter was heard by a

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the
Supreme Court.

At a hearing on June 6, 2001, the panel considered testimony, exhibits,
and stipulations. It received evidence that on January 9, 1998, Judge David Cain
of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas imposed a Civ.R. 11 sanction on
respondent in the amount of $5,000 to be paid in thirty days for frivolous
behavior in continuing to pursue an action despite his client's own
acknowledgement that she had no claim. Respondent did not appeal the order or
pay the sanction. Instead, he wrote a letter to the judge and filed suit against him.
The panel received evidence that on September 9, 1998, Judge Edmund A.
Sargus, Jr., of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
fined respondent $1,500 in attorney fees and $1,311.73 in costs for his conduct in
Lampley v. Vagnier (1998), No. C2-96-337. Respondent did not appeal this
sanction or two others in the same case that totaled $5,139, nor did he pay them,
except for possibly $300 of the attorney fees. On February 28, 2000, Judge
Sargus ordered respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be held
in contempt for failure to pay the sanctions.

The panel also received evidence that on February 11, 1999, Judge
Algenon L. Marbley of the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Ohio held respondent in contempt for the manner in which he comported
himself in Belcher v. Ohio Dept. Human Serv., (S.D.Ohio 1999), 48 F.Supp.3d
729, and ordered him to complete a six-week preceptorship with Professor
Shirley Mays of the Capital University Law School. Respondent did not at any
time comply with the requirements of the preceptorship.

The panel received further evidence that on July 7, 1999, Visiting Judge
John Martin of the Franklin County Common Pleas Court held respondent in
contempt and granted a mistrial due to respondent's conduct in Smith v.
Professional Cellular Serv., Inc., No. 95CVH-12-8949, and ordered him to pay
2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
January Term, 2002
attorney fees and court costs. Respondent instead filed a complaint against Judge
Martin.

In addition, the panel received evidence that respondent informed his
monitor, Judge Reese, that additional sanctions had been imposed against him of
$1,852.50 by Judge David Cain in Oglesby v. Columbus, Franklin C.P. No. 97-
CVC-03-3823, of $2,077.59 by Judge Nodine Miller of the Franklin County
Common Pleas Court in Hamm v. Gahanna City Council, No. 95CVF085484, of
$200 by Judge Cain in Michael v. Whitehall, No. 97CVC012333, and of $1,000
by Judge James L. Graham of the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Ohio in Archer v. Roman, No. C-2-95-1187.

On the basis of this evidence the panel found that respondent had not
fulfilled the purpose of his mentorship and that his conduct indicated that he
could neither function as a professional lawyer in a courtroom nor afford his
clients adequate representation.

In addition, the panel further found that respondent had not paid the costs
imposed in our December 1998 order. The panel recommended that respondent's
probation be terminated and that his suspension from the practice of law be
reinstated.

We have reviewed the record and adopt the findings of the panel. It is
clear from the numerous sanctions that respondent received during his term of
probation for his conduct in several courts, sanctions that remain unpaid, that the
mentor's report is credible. Further, in three years respondent has not paid the
costs we imposed in December 1998, costs that we ordered paid within ninety
days.

We have already revoked respondent's probation and reinstated his
suspension on October 4, 2001, "pending entry of a final order by this court." 93
Ohio St.3d 1438, 755 N.E.2d 901. Respondent is hereby suspended from the
practice of law for one year with credit for time served. Respondent is further
3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
ordered to pay the costs of the original proceeding in the amount of $1,363.71
plus interest of ten percent from March 8, 1999 until paid. Respondent shall
further pay the costs of these proceedings.
Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

Anonymous said...

BRAVO to you Karen Saffian !!! Justice for the victims is a must. It is a DAMN shame for these many years that justice has been denied. For what !!!??? Good Old Boy cover up mentality?, Reputations of the collective NHSP,Dept. of Safety,DOJ/Governors office ??? I would classify the whole Justice system in NH as nothing more than an offshoot of Organized crime. What a disgrace!! Beware the young lad from MA.

Christopher King said...

9:16

Just the facts from the Supreme Court of Ohio, just like we got the "facts" from NH LE on the Franconia shooting tragedy, right?

Or just like the "fact" that you and others previously wrote that I signed my letter to now-fired Jaffrey Chief Dunn "Esq." when you can clearly see that I did not.

Yet you persist:

"He got a job as a clerk for the NAACP, then wrote an extortion letter to the Jaffrey police signed ESQ, without the knowledge of his superiors. He found a guy who was popped for drunk and disorderly who NEVER CLAIMED AN INJURY and NEVER FILED A REPORT of any kind. King approached him with the promise of big bucks (minus King's percentage of course."


....Willie Toney was not "popped for drunk and disorderly," he was "popped" for LOITERING, end of story. And it was dismissed. And of course he had not claimed an injury or filed a report, that's why he called the NAACP you stupid douchebag.

*******

The brilliant thing is that none of what you say or do is going to affect the pending litigation or the FACT that Martha McLeod's emails are public record, or the FACT that there are 2 missing minutes of Grafton Dispatch to McKay while McKay was violating 8 pursuit and OC Spray protocols.

Run along now and git on back to your Topix circle jerk friends.

5:01

Yes it is a great letter from Karen and she and I have agreed on many things over the past year since we've met, and we have a mutual respect for each other, obviously or she wouldn't be associated with me, duh.

Christopher King said...

"He was fired for snorting or smoking something at the Hyatt Regency; not being able to make the cut as a waiter. As a crackhead though, he is perfect."

...Your IP address is being noted as I was fired for using my cell phone to call my lawyer during the bogus "indictment" and you know that.

...You pick up your level of lies and hatred as the time comes closer for your little LE buddies to face the music. Very interesting.

Anonymous said...

I "almost assuredly" won PowerBall Saturday night.

Christopher King said...

6:38

That's funny because last week I most assuredly DID meet someone who DID win the lottery!

Loose lips sink ships.

That's all for now.

Anonymous said...

This whole Murder cover up is crazy. When are the Feds going to get a grip, step in and clean up New Hampshire. Start at the TOP and work your way down with a Federal Probe. Many will lose their jobs, some may even go to jail. It looks like one Ex-Trooper should be going to jail for murder. Now NH just lost a good COP because he more than likely wouldn't conform to the corruption that exists. Keep up the good work Christoper King.

Christopher King said...

Look at the top, Kelly Ayotte lying and claiming she has no investigative files on a police shooting in Nashua.

Michael Paulhus.