28 August 2008

A KingCast RSA 91-A letter of clarification to NH Senior Homicide AG Jeffrey Strelzin on missing Grafton Dispatch audio and other devilish details.

Dear Attorney Strelzin:

Today I received your 25 August 2008 letter in which you inform me that the Bruce McKay 5/11 dash cam minutes from 6:07:24 through 6:09:15 p.m. are not missing.

In my review of this matter you are partially correct:

I have seen these times:
6:07:31 – 6:07:53 “backup….”
6:07:50 – 6:08:32 “toward Easton town line”
This leaves 6:08:32 – 6:09:15, or 43 seconds. So then pursuant to RSA 91-A I retender my request for that missing time.

Also still missing of course, is any review of the (im)propriety of Bruce McKay’s second stop, in which he clearly violated at least eight (8) Pursuit and OC Spray policies. Also missing of course is any explanation for why multiple felon Gregory W. Floyd went home with one of Liko Kenney’s live rounds in his pocket. And of course also missing is any explanation of the finding that Trooper Cooper expressly told Gregory W. Floyd were important, to see "how the guns got in the conditions they were in."

Also missing is any apology for you and Kelly using the uncorroborated Gregory W. Floyd statements that he spoke to Liko Kenney before shooting him, when Caleb Macaulay and Gregory P. Floyd and Gregory W. Floyd (twice) said he did not. Also missing is any explanation as to whether Bruce McKay ever fired his gun or whether Gregory W. Floyd fired all six (6) or more rounds from McKay’s gun and when he shot them. And last but not least, also still missing in(action) are any fingerprint analyses of the guns involved. The citizens of North Country believe the U.S. House will find those missing details quite compelling.

The Devil is in the details Jeff, and frankly he’s living pretty large these days.

See in general this post about your boss, NH AG Kelly Ayotte.


Christopher King said...

Okay, this is the part where I save time for the Trolls by just cutting and pasting their comments :)


"So, go back to popping your girlfriend’s ass pimples and have a nice night.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:46 PM




[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. King (2002), 95 Ohio St.3d 93.]

Attorneys at law --

MISCONDUCT -- One-year suspension

with credit for time
served -- Failing to fulfill purpose of mentorship imposed at previous
disciplinary proceeding -- Engaging in conduct indicating inability to
function as a professional lawyer in a courtroom or afford clients
adequate representation -- Failure to pay costs imposed at previous
disciplinary proceeding.
(No. 98-423 -- Submitted January 8, 2002 -- Decided April 24, 2002.)
ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and
Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 96-115.

Per Curiam. In December 1998, for conduct in January 1996, we
suspended Christopher King, now of Dallas, Texas, Attorney Registration No.
0062199, from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, but stayed the suspension
on the condition that during that year he be placed on probation and work with a
mentor appointed by the relator, Columbus Bar Association. Columbus Bar Assn.
v. King (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 174, 702 N.E.2d 862. We also imposed costs of
that proceeding on respondent.

On February 19, 1999, relator appointed Guy L. Reese II, a former
Franklin County Municipal Court Judge and a former Franklin County Common
Pleas Court Judge, to be respondent's mentor. Based upon the mentor's report to
the relator and respondent's failure to make the payment ordered in our December
1998 order, relator requested on September 13, 2000, that respondent's probation
be revoked, that his stayed suspension be reinstated, and that respondent be held
in contempt. Respondent opposed this request, and the matter was heard by a

panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the
Supreme Court.

At a hearing on June 6, 2001, the panel considered testimony, exhibits,
and stipulations. It received evidence that on January 9, 1998, Judge David Cain
of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas imposed a Civ.R. 11 sanction on
respondent in the amount of $5,000 to be paid in thirty days for frivolous
behavior in continuing to pursue an action despite his client's own
acknowledgement that she had no claim. Respondent did not appeal the order or
pay the sanction. Instead, he wrote a letter to the judge and filed suit against him.
The panel received evidence that on September 9, 1998, Judge Edmund A.
Sargus, Jr., of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
fined respondent $1,500 in attorney fees and $1,311.73 in costs for his conduct in
Lampley v. Vagnier (1998), No. C2-96-337. Respondent did not appeal this
sanction or two others in the same case that totaled $5,139, nor did he pay them,
except for possibly $300 of the attorney fees. On February 28, 2000, Judge
Sargus ordered respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be held
in contempt for failure to pay the sanctions.

The panel also received evidence that on February 11, 1999, Judge
Algenon L. Marbley of the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Ohio held respondent in contempt for the manner in which he comported
himself in Belcher v. Ohio Dept. Human Serv., (S.D.Ohio 1999), 48 F.Supp.3d
729, and ordered him to complete a six-week preceptorship with Professor
Shirley Mays of the Capital University Law School. Respondent did not at any
time comply with the requirements of the preceptorship.

The panel received further evidence that on July 7, 1999, Visiting Judge
John Martin of the Franklin County Common Pleas Court held respondent in
contempt and granted a mistrial due to respondent's conduct in Smith v.
Professional Cellular Serv., Inc., No. 95CVH-12-8949, and ordered him to pay

January Term, 2002
attorney fees and court costs. Respondent instead filed a complaint against Judge

In addition, the panel received evidence that respondent informed his
monitor, Judge Reese, that additional sanctions had been imposed against him of
$1,852.50 by Judge David Cain in Oglesby v. Columbus, Franklin C.P. No. 97-
CVC-03-3823, of $2,077.59 by Judge Nodine Miller of the Franklin County
Common Pleas Court in Hamm v. Gahanna City Council, No. 95CVF085484, of
$200 by Judge Cain in Michael v. Whitehall, No. 97CVC012333, and of $1,000
by Judge James L. Graham of the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Ohio in Archer v. Roman, No. C-2-95-1187.

On the basis of this evidence the panel found that respondent had not
fulfilled the purpose of his mentorship and that his conduct indicated that he
could neither function as a professional lawyer in a courtroom nor afford his
clients adequate representation.

In addition, the panel further found that respondent had not paid the costs
imposed in our December 1998 order. The panel recommended that respondent's
probation be terminated and that his suspension from the practice of law be

We have reviewed the record and adopt the findings of the panel. It is
clear from the numerous sanctions that respondent received during his term of
probation for his conduct in several courts, sanctions that remain unpaid, that the
mentor's report is credible. Further, in three years respondent has not paid the
costs we imposed in December 1998, costs that we ordered paid within ninety

We have already revoked respondent's probation and reinstated his
suspension on October 4, 2001, "pending entry of a final order by this court." 93
Ohio St.3d 1438, 755 N.E.2d 901. Respondent is hereby suspended from the
practice of law for one year with credit for time served. Respondent is further

ordered to pay the costs of the original proceeding in the amount of $1,363.71
plus interest of ten percent from March 8, 1999 until paid. Respondent shall
further pay the costs of these proceedings.
Judgment accordingly.


By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:52 PM

4:52 AM
Blogger Christopher King said...

And then my standard response from this post, in which one may click on all the links for clarification:


To the new and uninitiated:

Did you notice that NONE OF THIS has anything to do with what Caleb Macaulay said, or the lies that Kelly set forth?

Or the missing two (2) minutes of audio?

1. The fact of the matter is (again) that no one else in Ohio had got LE found liable for making someone a victim of violent crime.

2. $58,500.00 in 1998 dollars is more than reasonable for the fact that Michael had no palpable injury. Ask any lawyer.

3. Not only did we prevail on the settlement, we also won the criminal trials (the usual resisting arrest/assault on an Officer BS like they ran against Liko Kenney) before an all-white jury in Hamilton, Ohio, as the jury foreman told me part of the reason they voted for Michael and Justice was because I was better than Sam Boorst "you got more honey than his vinegar," was his EXACT quote.


4. There was no "wiretap," it was a phone recording on a speaker phone and it was not unethical or illegal because

a) Ohio had not adopted the model ABA rules.

b) Ohio was a one-party state, meaning only one party needs to know who is taping.

This is why they couldn't suspend me so instead they put me on "probation" for a year and I reported to a ex-military lawyer who at the end said I failed to fulfill the terms of my probation, so NOW I'm suspended. When asked in my suspension hearing what I failed to do that he wanted me to do, he had no answer.

And BTW one can see Mr. Isreal at my suspension hearing arguing in my defense.

And BTW we were attacking the same kind of racism that caused Peckett's to be closed when the government found that they would not accommodate black folks so rather than to follow the government order to desegregate, they closed the inn!

The landlord had called my client a "nigger lover," which I validated by neutral sources.

Anyway, on Pecketts, I know a guy that burned it down in a training exercise.

5. Now then, coming to the biggest joke of them all, the "extortion" case against me was DISMISSED in its entirety, along with the bogus "Unauthorized Practice of Law" case brought by Kelly.

Here is a summation post, showing the Demand Letter I sent to Chief Dunn after his cops stuck 3 guns in an unarmed man's face and visual body cavity searched him for loitering.

Yes, loitering. He won his criminal "case" without a lawyer, yes he did.

a) Police Chief Dunn fired.
b) Prosecutor Bill Albrecht resigns under an ethics investigation.
c) NAACP's Gloria Timmons and Jaffrey Chief Dunn both lied under Oath.
d) Nashua Telegraph and Mayor Streeter wrote editorial in favor of KingCast and gave me a Mayoral Commendation.

Thanks for bringing that up though so that people can see how foul the government and some "Civil Rights" organizations can be.

But what you failed to do my friend, is to offer any comment about what YOU have done for Civil Rights, or Right-to-Know.

Here's a good post from Daily Kos about today's NAACP:

"...I like your style, even if it's intemperate, it's creative intemperateness. I like that you touched on the way in which hallowed institutions from the civil rights era like NAACP are subject to intense pressures from those outside the organization who wish to subvert the "brand" from within. In this way, legacy institutions end up perverted and co-opted, since at the end of the day all organizations have to be run by real people in real time, in the present moment. If they don't take steps to energetically preserve and adapt their mission to changing times, it's like taking a cruise on the Queen Mary while she sits in dry dock. It's pretty, but you're not getting anywhere."


Lastly, you know what's funny?

I talk to people who have spoken with Casey Sherman about this matter, one of whom went to prep school with Casey.

He is a well-respected writer even as acknowledged by the same circle jerk trolls at Topix (where Casey no longer reads BTW) and I know that Casey is making some of the exact same points as I am. So when he publishes his book next year what will the trolls say then?

North Country folks will not be fooled by these trolls, I only bothered to respond because newbies might have some questions.

-The KingCaster

6:24 AM

4:55 AM

11:48 AM


KingCast: It's great to be me.

Randy said...

give me a buzz

Randy Markowitz


Christopher King said...

No way,

My crazy skateboarding prep school buddy Randy Markowitz, hell yah rock on dude, rock ON!

I haven't heard from this negro in years.

God I love this blawg :)

KingCast: Keepin' in touch.

Christopher King said...

Retender of RSA 91-A for missing 5/11 Grafton Dispatch audio.
Thursday, August 28, 2008 2:37 PM
"Christopher King" kingjurisdoctor@yahoo.com
Add sender to Contacts
Andrew.Paparella@abc.com, Kelly.Ayotte@doj.nh.gov, Jeffery.Strelzin@doj.nh.gov, Joanne.Robbins@doj.nh.gov, graftonca@yahoo.com, ray.burton4@gte.net, John.Gallus@leg.state.nh.us, robert.letourneau@leg.state.nh.us, martha.mcleod@leg.state.nh.us, townclerk@franconianh.org, dmullen@ranspell.com....

Dear Attorney Strelzin:


28 August 2008
A KingCast RSA 91-A letter of clarification to NH Senior Homicide AG Jeffrey Strelzin on missing Grafton Dispatch audio and other devilish details.

Anonymous said...

Wow, you are so smart. I can tell by the way you write these oh so important letters to the AG. How is it that the world has spun upon its axis for all this time without you incredible knowledge?

We are so lucky to have someone like you Mr. king. Oh so luky indeed. You are the best lawyer ever!!

Anonymous said...

Hey King, imagine if NH or OH disbarred you for being an asshole like this puke. You got off lucky, it wasn't until after you were disgraced that they found out that you were an asshole too!

New York Lawyer Disbarred for Being an Asshole

These aren't my words, this is what the Village Voice says about attorney Kenneth Heller (pictured to the left):

No other lawyer in the city but Heller, according to records of his disciplinary hearing, has been ousted for "obstructive and offensive behavior which did not involve fraud or deception."

Heller was disbarred for basically "being an asshole," as one adversary puts it. And in their profession, the rival adds, "that takes some doing."

Check it out! Here is a little preview of how Heller reacted to a judge he disagreed with: When Judge Howard Silver walked by Heller in the courtroom, he bellowed "Kiss my tuchis!" and then spat at him!

Christopher King said...


He spat at a judge?

Jeezus Christ man, I sued a Judge who sanctioned me without any evidentiary hearing, yah.

That pertains to Due Process, doy.

Imagine that you could stop the Franconia Collective from going to the U.S. House.

Imagine that Dick Dow did not murder his wife and adoptive son.

Imagine I gave a damn about your opinion.

Christopher King said...


Thanks, but I'm not really so smart.

I can only hope that by asking questions the NH Government can help educate me as to how it makes its decisions!

Peace out.

Anonymous said...

Good Luck with that !

What we do know is that McKay violated policies/protocols written to protect the public/himself.

We also know that the AG's office has violated policies/protocols as well.

I am curious to read the press release regards to the balistic studies relevant to the Jarvis case.

I hope/imagine that all the guns/evidence were tested according to the NH Homocide Manual. We know that was not the case with 5/11.

Or was it ? Perhaps it was and they are hiding the truth from the public.

Either way they have woven a web of deceit.

"Live Free or Die"

This is why Liko is dead. He tried to live free and take a stand against corruption in the community/state of New Hampshire and paid the ultimate price. He was/is a very courageous young man/spirit.

Anonymous said...

"This is why Liko is dead. He tried to live free and take a stand against corruption in the community/state of New Hampshire and paid the ultimate price. He was/is a very courageous young man/spirit."

Live free doesn't mean live lawless. Talk about an oxymoron a person who breaks the law repeatedly taking a "stand against corruption."

There were/are proper channels to handle the matter and Liko Kenney refused to use those proper channels. Instead he took matters into his own hands, that is why he died.

Anonymous said...

5:51 AM,

I think you are clueless.

Anonymous said...

The proper channels are clogged from the bottom up. We need some drano.

Anonymous said...

I have to wonder if the AG and the Franconia Selectmen, et al, are planning to appeal the judgement of Judge Vaughn. After all, King did include lies and mis-statements regarding various people within his documents.

The AG could have cleared up most of King's horsepucky information requests by saying that there were ongoing investigations, but maybe she didn't want to tip her hand to Caleb Macaulay, the Kenney Miller family and a bunch of select others.

I hope the AG does appeal and that the holes within RSA 91A are mended, at the very least to be held to the FEDERAL standards that exist under FOIA. Unfortunately, NH has been abiding by its own rules with disregard to Federal Law.

It is my true hope that in appellate decisions those holes are mended AND Mr. Christopher King is charged with over 2000 counts of libel... one for each time he uttered a lie against anyone on the internet.

Does RSA 91 need tuning... yes it does, properly and completely. Did Mr. King do this with that law in mind and not as an act of vengence, in my opinion, no he did not.


Anonymous said...


Always trying to divert attention away from we know who.

Talk about breaking the law ! Like father, like son.

So when is Floyd's hearing on the charges steeming from his temper tantrum in court. You know the one where he was found "Guilty" of criminal threatening.

We need to be there. The best part is it is all on tape, should be an easy case for the prosecution.

Run along and teach the men in your life how to be honest and treat people with respect.

Christopher King said...


Approach the legislature if you don't like what I'm doing, or file a case against me. You wanna' get on down email me and I'll even accept service via email, save you the money.

Otherwise STFU.

Meanwhile, take a look at what's been going on in Gloucester Mass with respect to the Lorraine Fire.