27 August 2008

KingCast presents: Outside agitators part deux -- when does the fun start in KingCast v. McLeod, Grafton 08-E-192?

It's purely evident that the closer things get to a hearing on the merits, the more the agitation comes out from a bunch of trolls, most of whom are truly from outside this case. I was invited to this case by Liko's friends, Oliver and others. In contrast, most of these trolls don't live in Franconia or North Country, nor have they dedicated any substantive work in terms of gathering information, not even a single RSA 91-A request. They are too busy attempting to malign me or anyone else who supports review of the 5/11 tragedy and active supervision of NH LE, as noted in yesterday's Ratemycop post.

Guess what: It's All Good.

These people -- angry and intentionally misinformed (read: stupid) as they wannabe, have absolutely no bearing on the merits of KingCast v. McLeod, Grafton Superior 08-E-192. In fact, I have mailed out the Certified Letter to Donna over at Grafton County Sheriff's office and you can read it in the comments, just before the standard hate mail that I will start posting myself to save time for my dissenters.

This is Outside Agitators part un.

Certified mail/$$ to Grafton County: 7007 0710 0000 3305 5390
Certified mail to Columbus Bar Ass'n: 7007 0710 0000 3305 0876

KingCast: It's great to be here.

6 comments:

Christopher King said...

CHRISTOPHER KING, J.D.

26 August 2008 VIA PRIORITY U.S. MAIL

Re: KingCast v. McLeod et al, Grafton 08-E-192

Dear Donna or appropriate personnel:

Enclosed please find a money order in the amount of $68.25.

I thank you in advance for effectuating service on the municipal respondents in this compelling First Amendment/Right-to-Know case. Obviously Chief Montminy will receive a copy and as to the Town and Selectmen, personally I hope that Rich McLeod receives service but ultimately it matters not.

Many people in North Country agree with me, and many do not.

Those who do not obviously don’t believe that government should be held accountable for its (in)actions, or even that emails to a public official are a matter of public record. As a former AAG I am perplexed by that sort of attitude and I know so too are many public officials, including recently-retired Nashua Mayor Bernard Streeter, a 30-year veteran of the Governor’s/Executive Council who gave me a Mayoral Right-to-Know Commendation for my work on this and other cases.

There are many compelling issues before us and I hope you stay tuned to follow the progress of this case.

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________
Christopher King, J.D.


cc: file

Christopher King said...

Okay, this is the part where I save time for the Trolls by just cutting and pasting their comments :)

********

"So, go back to popping your girlfriend’s ass pimples and have a nice night.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:46 PM
*

THE REAL CHRISTOPHER KING -

BELIEVE NOTHING HE SAYS BECAUSE HE IS A LIAR AND A DISCREDITED ATTORNEY - WITHOUT THE PROPER ETHICS, HE IS NOTHING - LET IT BE SAID ------


COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. KING.

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. King (2002), 95 Ohio St.3d 93.]

Attorneys at law --

MISCONDUCT -- One-year suspension

with credit for time
served -- Failing to fulfill purpose of mentorship imposed at previous
disciplinary proceeding -- Engaging in conduct indicating inability to
function as a professional lawyer in a courtroom or afford clients
adequate representation -- Failure to pay costs imposed at previous
disciplinary proceeding.
(No. 98-423 -- Submitted January 8, 2002 -- Decided April 24, 2002.)
ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and
Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 96-115.
__________________

Per Curiam. In December 1998, for conduct in January 1996, we
suspended Christopher King, now of Dallas, Texas, Attorney Registration No.
0062199, from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, but stayed the suspension
on the condition that during that year he be placed on probation and work with a
mentor appointed by the relator, Columbus Bar Association. Columbus Bar Assn.
v. King (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 174, 702 N.E.2d 862. We also imposed costs of
that proceeding on respondent.

On February 19, 1999, relator appointed Guy L. Reese II, a former
Franklin County Municipal Court Judge and a former Franklin County Common
Pleas Court Judge, to be respondent's mentor. Based upon the mentor's report to
the relator and respondent's failure to make the payment ordered in our December
1998 order, relator requested on September 13, 2000, that respondent's probation
be revoked, that his stayed suspension be reinstated, and that respondent be held
in contempt. Respondent opposed this request, and the matter was heard by a

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the
Supreme Court.

At a hearing on June 6, 2001, the panel considered testimony, exhibits,
and stipulations. It received evidence that on January 9, 1998, Judge David Cain
of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas imposed a Civ.R. 11 sanction on
respondent in the amount of $5,000 to be paid in thirty days for frivolous
behavior in continuing to pursue an action despite his client's own
acknowledgement that she had no claim. Respondent did not appeal the order or
pay the sanction. Instead, he wrote a letter to the judge and filed suit against him.
The panel received evidence that on September 9, 1998, Judge Edmund A.
Sargus, Jr., of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
fined respondent $1,500 in attorney fees and $1,311.73 in costs for his conduct in
Lampley v. Vagnier (1998), No. C2-96-337. Respondent did not appeal this
sanction or two others in the same case that totaled $5,139, nor did he pay them,
except for possibly $300 of the attorney fees. On February 28, 2000, Judge
Sargus ordered respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be held
in contempt for failure to pay the sanctions.

The panel also received evidence that on February 11, 1999, Judge
Algenon L. Marbley of the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Ohio held respondent in contempt for the manner in which he comported
himself in Belcher v. Ohio Dept. Human Serv., (S.D.Ohio 1999), 48 F.Supp.3d
729, and ordered him to complete a six-week preceptorship with Professor
Shirley Mays of the Capital University Law School. Respondent did not at any
time comply with the requirements of the preceptorship.

The panel received further evidence that on July 7, 1999, Visiting Judge
John Martin of the Franklin County Common Pleas Court held respondent in
contempt and granted a mistrial due to respondent's conduct in Smith v.
Professional Cellular Serv., Inc., No. 95CVH-12-8949, and ordered him to pay
2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
January Term, 2002
attorney fees and court costs. Respondent instead filed a complaint against Judge
Martin.

In addition, the panel received evidence that respondent informed his
monitor, Judge Reese, that additional sanctions had been imposed against him of
$1,852.50 by Judge David Cain in Oglesby v. Columbus, Franklin C.P. No. 97-
CVC-03-3823, of $2,077.59 by Judge Nodine Miller of the Franklin County
Common Pleas Court in Hamm v. Gahanna City Council, No. 95CVF085484, of
$200 by Judge Cain in Michael v. Whitehall, No. 97CVC012333, and of $1,000
by Judge James L. Graham of the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Ohio in Archer v. Roman, No. C-2-95-1187.

On the basis of this evidence the panel found that respondent had not
fulfilled the purpose of his mentorship and that his conduct indicated that he
could neither function as a professional lawyer in a courtroom nor afford his
clients adequate representation.

In addition, the panel further found that respondent had not paid the costs
imposed in our December 1998 order. The panel recommended that respondent's
probation be terminated and that his suspension from the practice of law be
reinstated.

We have reviewed the record and adopt the findings of the panel. It is
clear from the numerous sanctions that respondent received during his term of
probation for his conduct in several courts, sanctions that remain unpaid, that the
mentor's report is credible. Further, in three years respondent has not paid the
costs we imposed in December 1998, costs that we ordered paid within ninety
days.

We have already revoked respondent's probation and reinstated his
suspension on October 4, 2001, "pending entry of a final order by this court." 93
Ohio St.3d 1438, 755 N.E.2d 901. Respondent is hereby suspended from the
practice of law for one year with credit for time served. Respondent is further
3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
ordered to pay the costs of the original proceeding in the amount of $1,363.71
plus interest of ten percent from March 8, 1999 until paid. Respondent shall
further pay the costs of these proceedings.
Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:52 PM

Christopher King said...

And then my standard response from this post, in which one may click on all the links for clarification:

********

To the new and uninitiated:

Did you notice that NONE OF THIS has anything to do with what Caleb Macaulay said, or the lies that Kelly set forth?

Or the missing two (2) minutes of audio?


1. The fact of the matter is (again) that no one else in Ohio had got LE found liable for making someone a victim of violent crime.

2. $58,500.00 in 1998 dollars is more than reasonable for the fact that Michael had no palpable injury. Ask any lawyer.

3. Not only did we prevail on the settlement, we also won the criminal trials (the usual resisting arrest/assault on an Officer BS like they ran against Liko Kenney) before an all-white jury in Hamilton, Ohio, as the jury foreman told me part of the reason they voted for Michael and Justice was because I was better than Sam Boorst "you got more honey than his vinegar," was his EXACT quote.

*****

4. There was no "wiretap," it was a phone recording on a speaker phone and it was not unethical or illegal because

a) Ohio had not adopted the model ABA rules.

b) Ohio was a one-party state, meaning only one party needs to know who is taping.

This is why they couldn't suspend me so instead they put me on "probation" for a year and I reported to a ex-military lawyer who at the end said I failed to fulfill the terms of my probation, so NOW I'm suspended. When asked in my suspension hearing what I failed to do that he wanted me to do, he had no answer.

And BTW one can see Mr. Isreal at my suspension hearing arguing in my defense.

And BTW we were attacking the same kind of racism that caused Peckett's to be closed when the government found that they would not accommodate black folks so rather than to follow the government order to desegregate, they closed the inn!

The landlord had called my client a "nigger lover," which I validated by neutral sources.

Anyway, on Pecketts, I know a guy that burned it down in a training exercise.

5. Now then, coming to the biggest joke of them all, the "extortion" case against me was DISMISSED in its entirety, along with the bogus "Unauthorized Practice of Law" case brought by Kelly.

Here is a summation post, showing the Demand Letter I sent to Chief Dunn after his cops stuck 3 guns in an unarmed man's face and visual body cavity searched him for loitering.

Yes, loitering. He won his criminal "case" without a lawyer, yes he did.

a) Police Chief Dunn fired.
b) Prosecutor Bill Albrecht resigns under an ethics investigation.
c) NAACP's Gloria Timmons and Jaffrey Chief Dunn both lied under Oath.
d) Nashua Telegraph and Mayor Streeter wrote editorial in favor of KingCast and gave me a Mayoral Commendation.

Thanks for bringing that up though so that people can see how foul the government and some "Civil Rights" organizations can be.

But what you failed to do my friend, is to offer any comment about what YOU have done for Civil Rights, or Right-to-Know.

Here's a good post from Daily Kos about today's NAACP:

"...I like your style, even if it's intemperate, it's creative intemperateness. I like that you touched on the way in which hallowed institutions from the civil rights era like NAACP are subject to intense pressures from those outside the organization who wish to subvert the "brand" from within. In this way, legacy institutions end up perverted and co-opted, since at the end of the day all organizations have to be run by real people in real time, in the present moment. If they don't take steps to energetically preserve and adapt their mission to changing times, it's like taking a cruise on the Queen Mary while she sits in dry dock. It's pretty, but you're not getting anywhere."

******

Lastly, you know what's funny?

I talk to people who have spoken with Casey Sherman about this matter, one of whom went to prep school with Casey.

He is a well-respected writer even as acknowledged by the same circle jerk trolls at Topix (where Casey no longer reads BTW) and I know that Casey is making some of the exact same points as I am. So when he publishes his book next year what will the trolls say then?

North Country folks will not be fooled by these trolls, I only bothered to respond because newbies might have some questions.

-The KingCaster

6:24 AM

Christopher King said...

I can see the next stupid comment:

"King sent Grafton County $68.25, I'll bet he's trying to bribe the clerk of courts or the judge....."

LOL you tools, the Spirit of Liko Kenney and the call for Justice looms large.

Anonymous said...

CHRISSY PLAYING BY YOUR RULES. THE FACTS CLEARLY SHOW A PATTERN ON YOUR PART OF BLATANT DISREGARD FOR THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM. THE SAME WAY YOU ARE PLAYING THE GAME DIGGING UP ALL THIS "INFORMATION" ABOUT CPL. N. BRUCE MCKAY TO TRY AND USE AS JUSTIFICATION FOR LIKO KENNEY MURDERING CPL. N BRUCE MCKAY ON MAY 11, 2007.

Anonymous said...

You forgot to mention that McKay had "blatant disregard" for the policies/protocols thaty would have protected the citizens as well as himself.

At the very least he needed to return to the police academy for retraining. That should have been done years ago when the complaints started rolling in regarding is inappropriate conduct.

KOKO Chris !

The truth needs to be told and yes it hurts. And fact it SUCKS !

If the system is not fixed history will repeat itself.