28 August 2008

KingCast and Charlie Brown say: You can't keep a Good Man down!

So the day after I write the Columbus Bar Association to structure my re-admission to the Ohio Bar (and by inclusion all of the waive-in reciprocity states) a funny thing happened.

I got an email from an old client of mine who witnessed everything in Columbus, Ohio during my 7 years of active practice there who came into a rather large sum of money and who is starting a law-related company, at which I will be a senior executive. There is no requirement for this company that I be licensed, but that will indeed happen at some point.

In life, there are no coincidences.

Just like I was supposed to go to Tamarack tennis camp a coupla' years ago but couldn't make it due to NH LE shenanigans. Just like Liko Kenney couldn't make it there for a witness, either.

PS: Remember to write in Christopher King for NH Senate if you are on the Democratic ticket vs. Martha McLeod (website). You can read my position on her refusal to turn over her emails on the failed HB 1428 Bruce McKay Highway in Grafton County 08-E-192.

24 comments:

Christopher King said...

Okay, this is the part where I save time for the Trolls by just cutting and pasting their comments :)

********

"So, go back to popping your girlfriend’s ass pimples and have a nice night.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:46 PM
*

THE REAL CHRISTOPHER KING -

BELIEVE NOTHING HE SAYS BECAUSE HE IS A LIAR AND A DISCREDITED ATTORNEY - WITHOUT THE PROPER ETHICS, HE IS NOTHING - LET IT BE SAID ------


COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. KING.

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. King (2002), 95 Ohio St.3d 93.]

Attorneys at law --

MISCONDUCT -- One-year suspension

with credit for time
served -- Failing to fulfill purpose of mentorship imposed at previous
disciplinary proceeding -- Engaging in conduct indicating inability to
function as a professional lawyer in a courtroom or afford clients
adequate representation -- Failure to pay costs imposed at previous
disciplinary proceeding.
(No. 98-423 -- Submitted January 8, 2002 -- Decided April 24, 2002.)
ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and
Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 96-115.
__________________

Per Curiam. In December 1998, for conduct in January 1996, we
suspended Christopher King, now of Dallas, Texas, Attorney Registration No.
0062199, from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, but stayed the suspension
on the condition that during that year he be placed on probation and work with a
mentor appointed by the relator, Columbus Bar Association. Columbus Bar Assn.
v. King (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 174, 702 N.E.2d 862. We also imposed costs of
that proceeding on respondent.

On February 19, 1999, relator appointed Guy L. Reese II, a former
Franklin County Municipal Court Judge and a former Franklin County Common
Pleas Court Judge, to be respondent's mentor. Based upon the mentor's report to
the relator and respondent's failure to make the payment ordered in our December
1998 order, relator requested on September 13, 2000, that respondent's probation
be revoked, that his stayed suspension be reinstated, and that respondent be held
in contempt. Respondent opposed this request, and the matter was heard by a

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the
Supreme Court.

At a hearing on June 6, 2001, the panel considered testimony, exhibits,
and stipulations. It received evidence that on January 9, 1998, Judge David Cain
of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas imposed a Civ.R. 11 sanction on
respondent in the amount of $5,000 to be paid in thirty days for frivolous
behavior in continuing to pursue an action despite his client's own
acknowledgement that she had no claim. Respondent did not appeal the order or
pay the sanction. Instead, he wrote a letter to the judge and filed suit against him.
The panel received evidence that on September 9, 1998, Judge Edmund A.
Sargus, Jr., of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
fined respondent $1,500 in attorney fees and $1,311.73 in costs for his conduct in
Lampley v. Vagnier (1998), No. C2-96-337. Respondent did not appeal this
sanction or two others in the same case that totaled $5,139, nor did he pay them,
except for possibly $300 of the attorney fees. On February 28, 2000, Judge
Sargus ordered respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be held
in contempt for failure to pay the sanctions.

The panel also received evidence that on February 11, 1999, Judge
Algenon L. Marbley of the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Ohio held respondent in contempt for the manner in which he comported
himself in Belcher v. Ohio Dept. Human Serv., (S.D.Ohio 1999), 48 F.Supp.3d
729, and ordered him to complete a six-week preceptorship with Professor
Shirley Mays of the Capital University Law School. Respondent did not at any
time comply with the requirements of the preceptorship.

The panel received further evidence that on July 7, 1999, Visiting Judge
John Martin of the Franklin County Common Pleas Court held respondent in
contempt and granted a mistrial due to respondent's conduct in Smith v.
Professional Cellular Serv., Inc., No. 95CVH-12-8949, and ordered him to pay
2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
January Term, 2002
attorney fees and court costs. Respondent instead filed a complaint against Judge
Martin.

In addition, the panel received evidence that respondent informed his
monitor, Judge Reese, that additional sanctions had been imposed against him of
$1,852.50 by Judge David Cain in Oglesby v. Columbus, Franklin C.P. No. 97-
CVC-03-3823, of $2,077.59 by Judge Nodine Miller of the Franklin County
Common Pleas Court in Hamm v. Gahanna City Council, No. 95CVF085484, of
$200 by Judge Cain in Michael v. Whitehall, No. 97CVC012333, and of $1,000
by Judge James L. Graham of the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Ohio in Archer v. Roman, No. C-2-95-1187.

On the basis of this evidence the panel found that respondent had not
fulfilled the purpose of his mentorship and that his conduct indicated that he
could neither function as a professional lawyer in a courtroom nor afford his
clients adequate representation.

In addition, the panel further found that respondent had not paid the costs
imposed in our December 1998 order. The panel recommended that respondent's
probation be terminated and that his suspension from the practice of law be
reinstated.

We have reviewed the record and adopt the findings of the panel. It is
clear from the numerous sanctions that respondent received during his term of
probation for his conduct in several courts, sanctions that remain unpaid, that the
mentor's report is credible. Further, in three years respondent has not paid the
costs we imposed in December 1998, costs that we ordered paid within ninety
days.

We have already revoked respondent's probation and reinstated his
suspension on October 4, 2001, "pending entry of a final order by this court." 93
Ohio St.3d 1438, 755 N.E.2d 901. Respondent is hereby suspended from the
practice of law for one year with credit for time served. Respondent is further
3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
ordered to pay the costs of the original proceeding in the amount of $1,363.71
plus interest of ten percent from March 8, 1999 until paid. Respondent shall
further pay the costs of these proceedings.
Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:52 PM

4:52 AM
Delete
Blogger Christopher King said...

And then my standard response from this post, in which one may click on all the links for clarification:

********

To the new and uninitiated:

Did you notice that NONE OF THIS has anything to do with what Caleb Macaulay said, or the lies that Kelly set forth?

Or the missing two (2) minutes of audio?


1. The fact of the matter is (again) that no one else in Ohio had got LE found liable for making someone a victim of violent crime.

2. $58,500.00 in 1998 dollars is more than reasonable for the fact that Michael had no palpable injury. Ask any lawyer.

3. Not only did we prevail on the settlement, we also won the criminal trials (the usual resisting arrest/assault on an Officer BS like they ran against Liko Kenney) before an all-white jury in Hamilton, Ohio, as the jury foreman told me part of the reason they voted for Michael and Justice was because I was better than Sam Boorst "you got more honey than his vinegar," was his EXACT quote.

*****

4. There was no "wiretap," it was a phone recording on a speaker phone and it was not unethical or illegal because

a) Ohio had not adopted the model ABA rules.

b) Ohio was a one-party state, meaning only one party needs to know who is taping.

This is why they couldn't suspend me so instead they put me on "probation" for a year and I reported to a ex-military lawyer who at the end said I failed to fulfill the terms of my probation, so NOW I'm suspended. When asked in my suspension hearing what I failed to do that he wanted me to do, he had no answer.

And BTW one can see Mr. Isreal at my suspension hearing arguing in my defense.

And BTW we were attacking the same kind of racism that caused Peckett's to be closed when the government found that they would not accommodate black folks so rather than to follow the government order to desegregate, they closed the inn!

The landlord had called my client a "nigger lover," which I validated by neutral sources.

Anyway, on Pecketts, I know a guy that burned it down in a training exercise.

5. Now then, coming to the biggest joke of them all, the "extortion" case against me was DISMISSED in its entirety, along with the bogus "Unauthorized Practice of Law" case brought by Kelly.

Here is a summation post, showing the Demand Letter I sent to Chief Dunn after his cops stuck 3 guns in an unarmed man's face and visual body cavity searched him for loitering.

Yes, loitering. He won his criminal "case" without a lawyer, yes he did.

a) Police Chief Dunn fired.
b) Prosecutor Bill Albrecht resigns under an ethics investigation.
c) NAACP's Gloria Timmons and Jaffrey Chief Dunn both lied under Oath.
d) Nashua Telegraph and Mayor Streeter wrote editorial in favor of KingCast and gave me a Mayoral Commendation.

Thanks for bringing that up though so that people can see how foul the government and some "Civil Rights" organizations can be.

But what you failed to do my friend, is to offer any comment about what YOU have done for Civil Rights, or Right-to-Know.

Here's a good post from Daily Kos about today's NAACP:

"...I like your style, even if it's intemperate, it's creative intemperateness. I like that you touched on the way in which hallowed institutions from the civil rights era like NAACP are subject to intense pressures from those outside the organization who wish to subvert the "brand" from within. In this way, legacy institutions end up perverted and co-opted, since at the end of the day all organizations have to be run by real people in real time, in the present moment. If they don't take steps to energetically preserve and adapt their mission to changing times, it's like taking a cruise on the Queen Mary while she sits in dry dock. It's pretty, but you're not getting anywhere."

******

Lastly, you know what's funny?

I talk to people who have spoken with Casey Sherman about this matter, one of whom went to prep school with Casey.

He is a well-respected writer even as acknowledged by the same circle jerk trolls at Topix (where Casey no longer reads BTW) and I know that Casey is making some of the exact same points as I am. So when he publishes his book next year what will the trolls say then?

North Country folks will not be fooled by these trolls, I only bothered to respond because newbies might have some questions.

-The KingCaster

6:24 AM

4:55 AM

11:48 AM

*******

KingCast: It's great to be me.

Anonymous said...

And this is the part where an anonymous troll, whose motives are unclear and has a somewhat psychotic fixation, chimes in and says:

Agenda is to get back at Ayotte...blah blah blah...Crook, felon, huckster...blah blah blah...libeling, two-faced, backstabbing ___hole ___head...blah blah blah...

Speaking of which QM is reveling in the fact that the only "active" post over at Topic is the King Bash one. I say, hey dumb a__, self fullfulling prophisy when you drive off everyone else with your childish stupidity and synchophantic minions high-fiving you. D-bag (that's for TL, Snowy, J MO, etc).

Anonymous said...

who exactly was driven off a Kenney family member that stopped posting because of Chrissy's rants and raving. A former candidate for office in Franconia who never even used their real name or location, yet ran a campaign on "transparency and accountability", or a BBW who betrayed her own family to get in the good graces of Chrissy, because she is infatuaited with him.

Anonymous said...

This is how to make a small fortune.

Start with a big one.

Let us know how it works out...


"I got an email from an old client of mine who witnessed everything in Columbus, Ohio during my 7 years of active practice there who came into a rather large sum of money and who is starting a law-related company, at which I will be a senior executive."

Horn Dog said...

All the best, Chris.

Anonymous said...

good news chrissy will be moving on with his travelling sideshow huckster carnival

Christopher King said...

9:09

The only person infatuated with me, other than my girlfriend.... is you.

9:49

Nah, these people are seasoned attorneys who know exactly what the hell they are doing, and they have been watching me for a long time and are glad to have me on board.

10:12

Au Contraire, these people will be looking into the Franconia matter as well. Here's the latest.

KingCast: Where it's always a beautiful day.

Anonymous said...

Translation:

"Nah, these people are seasoned attorneys who know exactly what the hell they are doing,"

They were disbarred the same week as me.

"and they have been watching me for a long time"

we spoke on the phone and I didn't tell them about this blog.

"and are glad to have me on board."

I threatened to sue them if they didn't hire me.

Anonymous said...

9:09 pm

I know who you are, so watch your step. What you are posting is so far from the truth.

It is clear to many that you have some very serious emotional issues.

My hope is that you have supervised visitation with the new little one in your life.

Dude, your crazy !

Anonymous said...

Good news Chris !

Oh by the way, I am suppose to be "infatuaited" with you. If Mr. Bill were not so pathetic it would be funny.

Give my regards to your "girly girl".

Some people will put anything out there to divert attention away from the truth.

I do have one question for you.....

Why does it seem some of the most emotionally unstable people work for the Government ?

Have a good night !

Christopher King said...

5:24

Thanks, and let me know if you have any further sightings of L/Snowy/North Shore, best known as:

"Sasquatch"

Christopher King said...

2:44

Now when you say "disbarred" you mean like Michael McLaughlin, who was barred again and who now works for Shaheen & Gordon?

Because I don't have any experience with being disbarred.

Peace out.

Anonymous said...

"Good news Chris !

Oh by the way, I am suppose to be "infatuaited" with you. If Mr. Bill were not so pathetic it would be funny.

Give my regards to your "girly girl".

Some people will put anything out there to divert attention away from the truth.

I do have one question for you.....

Why does it seem some of the most emotionally unstable people work for the Government ?

Have a good night !"

5:24 PM

Donna,
If you had a clue what you were talking about it might have some weight. I haven't posted in these blogs since Chris and I made our agreement. That was prior to my wife and I leaving for Italy for vacation, which Chris was aware of. Chris and I have spoken several times since my return as well. Since our return from vacation my wife and I have been in school every day preparing for the upcoming school year.
Bill

Anonymous said...

Not sure who Donna is but let me say this...........

Your still crazy, I have followed the posts on Topix and you my friend are the one that started all of this.

You could not handle the fact that the FC moved on with or without you.

We survived unlike Liko who was gunned down by a crazy man for no reason at all.

Hope you enjoyed your trip to Italy.

Christopher King said...

And then returning to Topic, we have the Dow Murders as symbolic of all matter of malfeasance in NH LE.

Take a look.

Anonymous said...

"Not sure who Donna is but let me say this...........
Your still crazy, I have followed the posts on Topix and you my friend are the one that started all of this. You could not handle the fact that the FC moved on with or without you. We survived unlike Liko who was gunned down by a crazy man for no reason at all.

Hope you enjoyed your trip to Italy."

I couldn't handle the "collective" moving on with or without me ?

I don't need the collective or any aspect of the 5/11/07 tragedy to feel like I have meaning or direction in my life.

I started it in TOPIX ?
No I kept it out of TOPIX and handled it privately as it should have been done.(something you obviously know nothing about) When my personal information was revealed I just played the same game as you did, but you couldn't handle it.

My only recent post in TOPIX was to request that things about Chris and me be dropped after the issue between Chris and I was resolved. Chris agreed, end of the story.

I wasn't aware that your first amendment rights negated my rights or anyone else's to express their dissenting opinion.

You are either blind or live in an obviously delusional world and believe Liko Kenney didn't cause the death of N. Bruce McKay.

Its a sad commentary when people like you expect compassion and understanding for "your cause" while maintaining ZERO compassion and understanding for the 10 year old daughter of a murdered police officer. That's pretty twisted by anyones standards.

Chris and I know where we stand with each other, and although we may not agree about everything we have enough respect for one another to agree to disagree.
In the future it would behoove you to mind your own business.
Bill

Anonymous said...

As usually, distort things you know little about.

I'm going to call you the "distorter"

Back at ya DUDE !

Anonymous said...

Any man/woman that would harm or incite fear weather that be physically, emotionally or psychologically onto their spouse knowing there is a child in the equasion is a "child abuser" in my opinion.

Did McKay indirectly abuse his daughter. Yes !

Did his wife seek protection from the court for protection ? yes

Was a DOMESTIC VILOENCE INJUNCTION GRANTED by the court ? YES

Bill, do not distort my words statements when it comes to children because I am a very big child advocate as well as victim advocate.

I have said many prayers for that little girl who too is a victim of her fathers irrational actions.

Oh no you didn't !!!!!!!!!!!

Several days after 5/11 I took a stand and have stayed there. I have not swayed back and forth regardless of how difficult it has been/will be.

You do not know where you stand nor does it even matter. One thing that does matter is you are no longer trusted.

Betrayed once shame on you ! Betrayed twice, shame on me !

Welcome home !

Anonymous said...

I know who you are, because you always spell everything phonetically when you post.
I didn't distort any words they are out in the Internet world for all to see.
McKay's wife filed a restraining order, lets talk about how many false orders of protection are issued daily, weekly, monthly. The order was a temporary order, and no permanent order was ever issued against Cpl. McKay.

You walk a slippery slope when you start digging up someones personal past life that has no relevance to their professional one.

Is it child abuse when a parent is growing illegal drugs endangering the child?

Let's dig into the criminal background on the Kenney family. I'd bet it will show the parents disregard for the law flowed downhill. How many times was Cherone busted for possesion or the other family members? How about David Kenney, Liko's father ?


I know exactly where I stand I watched a video of a troubled 24 year old man shoot and murder a police officer, during a routine traffic stop.
My view is the same view as the majority of the people who have viewed the video.

You can dig and drag Cpl. N Bruce McKay's name through the mud all you want it won't change one damn thing, and all it does is make you look like exactly what you are a vindictive fool.

I didn't reach my decision hastily, nor did I react with emotion, I reviewed all the evidence that I was provided with, and the bottom line is Liko Kenney had no justification for shooting and murdering Cpl. N Bruce McKay. The same conclusion NH Attorney Mark Sisti reached, that's why the wrongful death suit never went forward. I know Mark personally and my NH business partner is related to the Sisti family.

Trust ? How dare you even use the word trust, anyone who betrays their own blood is no one to be trusted.

I could really care less what you think of me you are nothing more than a faceless person hiding behind a computer screen posting on a blog. You are a taker and an abuser of peoples trust, which I offered up freely from the onset of my involvement.

In the grand scheme of life you are insignificant to me. I value my family, friends, and associates who know me in real life, not some Internet blogger with an axe to grind with LEO.

You don't have the intellectual capability nor the maturity level to have a logical discussion about the events of May 11, 2007 you have one viewpoint and that is it. That was very apparent when I withdrew my support, and you turned on me in a heartbeat.

I wish no one in the "collective" any misfortune in any way, shape, or form, to bad collective members refuse to extend the same respect and courtesy to those who don't agree with them.

I'm going to enjoy a glorious day with my 2 grand daughters and my wife, family that's what is the most important thing at the end of the day.

Anonymous said...

I would agree !

It is a much better use of your time then continuing to post contradictions.

Enjoy the family time, life is precious.

Anonymous said...

And to think you shared and blogged that same "view point" for almost a year.

The wonderful thing is we all have the ability to change our minds/opinions. Some do, some don't !

Nothing wrong with that !

Christopher King said...

I'll say this:

Whether or not one agrees with my point that Liko shot McKay out of self-defense and fear (and thus not murder) you cannot disagree that the complete investigation was a sham.

Plus, murderers don't typically try to call their uncles 3 times to be a witness.

So Bill and I do disagree on that but in any event I've been otherwise busy today:


Take a look at what's been going on in Gloucester Mass with respect to the Lorraine Fire.

-c

Anonymous said...

Chris,
thanks...I apologize for the sidetrack. I sent you an email.
B

Christopher King said...

2:40/B

Gotcha'

Sent you one back.

Cheers,

-c