May it please the Court:
On 15 June 2008 Petitioner emailed Attorney Mullen regarding his clients' obligations pursuant to RSA 91-A as noted:
I know you have five (5) children and I want you to rock out with them today and enjoy your fatherhood.
But tomorrow I want you to notify me on the status of my outstanding RSA 91-A requests. I wrote you back on 22 May 2008 and you responded indicating that things were coming soon. Then I reminded you on 2 June 2008. It is now 15 June and still no word. I've been patient. Please advise.
But he has not advised and as you can see from the itemized attachment he indicated things should have been ready for production. This is an ongoing pattern that predates to them allegedly not knowing the context for the Troy Watts Bruce McKay ethics complaint in spite of the fact that Petitioner gave them a copy of the Troy Watt's email on the matter nearly a year ago. He captioned said email "Franconia, Fear & Loathing" and in it he wrote:
"I wrote a long letter of grievance to both the Chief [and Prosecutor Hiliare, who provided his copy immediately on request]."
Again Your Honor this goes to the Contempt of Court issue as well as apportionment of Court Costs to be assessed to Defendants jointly and severally.
Respectfully submitted/CK on behalf of KingCast.net.