14 February 2008

KingCast and Brian Jesseman lawsuit against Joe McQuaid to knock out the haters who misappropriated likeness in a False Light invasion of privacy.

Somebody's going down like Sonny Liston.

It will be filed Thursday, 21 February as a scheduling conflict prohibited Mr. Jesseman from meeting me last Friday.

1. Here's the Complaint.
2. Here's the Motion for Injunctive Relief on evidence destruction.
3. Here's Complaint Attachment 5/Motion Attachment 3.

The lawsuit is a lot more complex than I let on -- particularly in the use of the recent P2P/file sharing cases and in the area of sought relief. See Laface Records, LLC v. Does 1-5, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72225 (U.S. WDSD Michigan, Sept. 27 2007) at p. 3, 4.


10. Plaintiffs seek an immediate bench order that Defendant is not to purge or to otherwise destroy any back up files, mirror files, hard drives, paper printouts or any potential discovery in this matter until it is resolved. See generally FTC v. Odysseus Mktg., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30230, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30230, April 19, 2006, Laface Records, LLC v. Does 1-5, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72225 (U.S. WDSD Michigan, Sept. 27 2007) at 3,4. See Plaintiffs’ contemporaneously-filed Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief.

11. Plaintiffs seek a finding that:

a). Plaintiff Jesseman is entitled to immediate production of the IP address and for other postings issued by this person(s) regarding Bruce McKay, Liko Kenney or Gregory Floyd so that Petitioners may check for patterns of misconduct.

b). KingCast has standing to pursue the immediate production of the IP address as this is a public matter, see generally Union Leader v. City of Nashua, 141 N.H. 473, 475, 686 A.2d 310, 312 (1996) and Smith v. Town of Windsor, 386 F. Supp. 2d 374; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19948; 34 Media L. Rep. 1222, June 24, 2005. While some LE and even Judges do not like what KingCast does with video, such is not the point: This is essentially a Right-to-Know case because the Union Leader is virtually a State Actor and in Right-to-Know Law cases, the plaintiff's motives for seeking disclosure are irrelevant. Id.


Christopher King said...

That's a Christmas Cactus behind Liko's head, BTW. Martha had a couple of those in her house, circa 2000. Damn those scallops were tasty.......and that's the "Beatnick Jesus" on the wall, taking it all in.

As I said, I too love a journey through the secret life of Plants, as noted from this cockpit.

Christopher King said...

Liko was smarter than the haters want you to know. That's why they (tried to) cover up his knowledge of Fourth Amendment law in Fox Hill Park as adjudicated by Judge Cyr on several Unconstitutional Arrests.

Remember KingCast and the Franconia Collective are responsible for obtaining and publicly airing the Bruce McKay OC Spray video against Sarah, the back seat cruiser video where Liko schools McKay on the Fourth Amendment, as well as the courtroom audio of Gregory Floyd getting a Permanent Restraining Order against him for criminal threats (yet again).

It's all too much to link right now but it has been shown here and on YouTube consistently, just YouTube "Liko" or" Gregory Floyd" or "Franconia511" and there you go.


Some people fancy Teflon Don Floyd a Federal Witness, and DTRT hinted at that in a Topix post. We're looking into that. He certainly does act as if he's got a blank check and stack of get out of jail cards from his "friends" in LE.


I too am smarter than the haters tried to portray me and fortunately I'm still drawing breath so I can help bring forward Liko's Spirit, and dammit that's what I'm going to do, incessantly, until I'm good and satisfied that I'm finished.

Which will likely never happen.

Peace, Aloha, Namaste.

Christopher King said...

Here's the part where DTRT implies that Gregory W. Floyd is a Federally-protected witness.

Thursday Jan 31

Doing the Right Thing wrote:
quoted text
And the courts shall, too... when they haul you in for federal Libel and inciting fear charges, harrassing a federal witness, terrorism.

.....And that theory would make sense because I've heard that back in the late 90's other LE even tried to figure out Floyd's rap sheet (look at it) and how he managed to hold a gun permit in Massachusetts and they were told to BACK OFF.

I'm not too naive to believe that Federally-protected people are incapable of breaking the law, up to and including murder and getting away with it.

After all, remember how I asked Defendant Ayotte to see any documents where the investigated Floyd's claim that he "killed 43 people" and she had nothing.

Is that because a lowly State AG knows her place not to investigate somebody with Federal carte blanche?

Christopher King said...

Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 7:40:26 -0800
From: "Jeff Jesseman"
To: "Charles Perkins" cperkins@unionleader.com
Subject: Re: UnionLeader.com posting


Brian is my son and he is actively involved in making changes in Franconia. He is not in favor of any memorial for McKay, in the Notch or anywhere. He was good friend with Liko and knows how McKay operated from first hand experience. He is unaware of this because he does not read the UL nor does he have a computer with internet in his home.

If you would like a statement to this fact it can be provided. The real question is who did this and how? You must have the IP info and contact info supplied, we'd like to have it.

---- Charles Perkins cperkins@unionleader.com wrote:

The posting in question has been removed, at least for now. I know there is a Brian Jesseman in Franconia. I'm puzzled because he has not questioned the comment. Why are you sure it is a forgery, and why hasn't he spoken up?

Charles Perkins, UnionLeader.com

Christopher King said...

Cracks me up. "Why hasn't he spoken up?"

He's about to, loud and clear.

Anonymous said...

Floyd, expert shot that he is with 43 kills....
How old is he?
Maybe kill number one was Sullivan.

Christopher King said...

Now that UL has has counsel contact me, I'm a bit less upset. Reading between the lines of our conversation I believe it's just a policy with the UL not to provide the information without a court order.

We shall see, in short -- ahem -- order.

Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:18:54 -0800 (PST)
From: "Christopher King" kingjurisdoctor@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: Today's lawsuit and Motion for TRO
To: "Gregory V. Sullivan, Esq."
CC: kingjurisdoctor@yahoo.com

Dear Attorney Sullivan:

I have not filed yet but anticipate so doing.

Any chance we get this resolved through extrajudicial

Trust me, if we do I will be most gracious to your
client. Otherwise I'm in it to win it, loudly and in a
very public manner.

Very Truly Yours,

Christopher King, J.D.
Plaintiff/Petitioner Pro Se
On behalf of KingCast.net

--- "Gregory V. Sullivan, Esq." wrote:

Dear Mr. King: We represent Union Leader Corporation of Manchester. Your emails have been referred to me by our client for reply. In the event that you decide to file a civil action against our client please have the writ delivered to our offices in Manchester and we will accept service. Please contact me, and not our client, should you wish to discuss this matter in greater detail.

Gregory V. Sullivan, Esquire
Malloy & Sullivan,
Lawyers Professional Corporation
78 West Merrimack Street
Manchester, New Hampshire 03101
(603) 668-3737

Anonymous said...

Wow, you made it sound like you had filed suit. The guy just told you he would accept service, and you are claiming you are in it to win it? Of course you are, as is he.

Shit or get off the pot. Let's see some action, enough with the posing.

Christopher King said...

No posing, dude.

I didn't pose in Grafton County, either and now we have the McKay OC Spray video rolling and a decision to come soon.

Oh, yeah:

The only reason we didn't file today was because Brian couldn't make it down and I need his signature and notary so that will all happen by Tuesday or Wednesday.

And contrary to your assertion, opposing counsel might no be "in it to win it" but simply following marching orders that protect UL from liability for unlawful disclosure.

Now you have been appropriately educated, Grasshopper.

Christopher King said...

And with that I'll be returning to my work in the Gloucester fire case, in which the Gloucester Times has stated that our proposed legislation

Here you go, 5 Feb. 2008.

But first noted here:

1 Feb. 2008.

"The residents of the Lorraine were apparently never notified of their building's hazards. But they — and other residents of such buildings around the state — would have that right if this new proposal were to become law.

Now that would be a fitting legacy for Mr. Taylor."

And oh, State Rep and State Sentor are all about it.

"We stress that we are not specifically saying that the out-of-code conditions caused the fatal fire at the Lorraine. That issue may have to be litigated. What we are saying is that when landlords don't inform, the potential to abuse people who don't have a lot of money looms large," Crnilovic and King wrote.

KingCast: Making headway despite snide comments since 1996.

Anonymous said...

"Shit or get off the pot. Let's see some action, enough with the posing."

4:19 would you like a turn to take a crap at this one?

The Union Leader is a disgrace to New Hampshire and its citizens, Every day, its citizens are reminded they suck by Mcquaid and his rag. Who is he to ruin the state and the individuals in it? O'riley kicked his ass didn't you know. being a monopoly on info will have consequences. New Hampshire deserves better than the union misleader.

Christopher King said...


I suppose yet another question is "why doesn't any other media entity care enough to get the McKay OC Spray of Sarah or the identity of a bogus poster?"


Anonymous said...

9:25, I would rather smell you ass than listen to your opinion about a newspaper in in bred NH. I am here for Chris King antics, not for your timid rants on justice. King, sue or shut up. This circus is starting to bore me.

Thanks and have a great day.

Christopher King said...


I don't run by your clock.

I'll get it done when I get it done.

Just as in Grafton, where we're waiting on the hearing.

Brian and I will have that IP address shortly.

Meanwhile enjoy Kelly's 3-ring circus.

Christopher King said...


And watch your mouth up in here on my blawg. In case you haven't noticed I've pretty much abandoned the swearing I used to do when I was under that bogus indictment and UPL charge by Kelly and her "finest" LE.

Anonymous said...

But you are fronting like you have sued. You are not being totally honest. Its an act.

I took the bombast for the truth. Like the rest of these rubes.

Great line, "you are in it to win it". And yet the newspaper is saying go ahead, sue us. They are too.

And being in it to win it does not guarantee results. There it is, that results thing again. To date, nothing except a C Grade Blair Witch Project movie and a richly deserved spanking from the courts. Though you got to make a movie aboutpoat on youtube a video of, oh my stars, you.

You are not suing anyone King. Great sabre rattling, though.

Sorry about the crude reference. My bad.

Christopher King said...


It is your bad.

You talked the same nonsense before the Grafton lawsuit, which did of course provide us with the Bruce McKay OC Spraying Sarah video.

Is that the "Blair Witch Video" to which you refer?

And you keep saying that they are in it to win it, too but you weren't the one talking with their counsel, were you.


That would be me talking with counsel while you talk trash.

Such is your nature though.

Christopher King said...


"a richly deserved spanking from the courts."

....Do tell. Got a case number, a ruling on the merits that I haven't seen?


lijialefw said...

There are two wow gold very good games Web site, the site wow power leveling of a high degree of credibility, good power leveling quality and have a good trading platform, we can wow powerleveling have time to look at.