"Two of those documents were not in our possession and the three that were released to you but withheld by us, were done so pursuant to RSA 91-A:5."
First of all, there were six documents as you will see when you click here. Please identify which of those documents, Counselor, were not in your possession and which ones were in your possession but not released. Here they are, again at the first seven (7) links:
1. Floyd was a military AWOL liarhead.
2. Assault and disturbing the peace?
3. In violation of Mass and Federal Law?
4. Held guns in Mass.
5. Search warrant signed by Judge Cyr.
6. Stole the Virgin Mary #1.
7. Stole the Virgin Mary #2.
8. Newspapers scared of Floyd.
Then you wrote:
"As to your second request, there are no additional documents in our possession beyond those already provided to you, with the exception of those documents or portions withheld from release pursuant to RSA 91-A:5."
Okay, fine Counselor. That basically means that the State doesn't care too much about Floyd's arrest for Assault with Dangerous Weapons or his conviction for disorderly conduct. You wish I would go away but there's not much chance of that. In fact, I've got college students studying this case, all the way back to the ridiculous 2003 arrest of Liko Kenney was was not actively violating any laws, when Bruce McKay started with his put-downs, "Maybe you should go back to school," and "Where are you from Liko?"
As if there is anyone in Franconia or Littleton who doesn't know where the Kenneys are from. What a jerk. Here's a big old scan of Attorney Strelzin covering up what he and Kelly willfully and deceitfully hid from the American Public.