I watch out. Kelly better watch out, too.
As noted in this post, Defendant Ayotte (KingCast v. NH AG Kelly Ayotte et al., Grafton 07-E-268) appears to be in substantial violation for failure to follow the Law requiring an Annual Report from the Right-to-Know Commission of which she is a member. Said failure is supposed to result in dismissal. Check the Topix board for further discussion or read this:
The impact of Kelly's Oath, as noted by her signature:
RSA 92:2 Oath Required. Any such person who violates said oath after taking the same shall be forthwith dismissed from the office or position involved....
The members of the oversight commission shall be as follows:
(a) Four members of the house of representatives, one from the science, technology and energy committee, one from the municipal and county government committee, one from the judiciary committee, and one other member, appointed by the speaker of the house.
(b) Three members of the senate, appointed by the president of the senate.
(c) Three municipal officials, appointed by the New Hampshire Municipal Association.
(d) One school board member, appointed by the New Hampshire School Boards Association.
(e) One school administrator, appointed by the New Hampshire School Administrators Association.
(f) Two county officials, appointed by the New Hampshire Association of Counties.
(g) Four members of the public, one of whom shall be an attorney who has knowledge of and experience with the right-to-know law, one of whom shall be an information technology professional, and one of whom shall be a telecommunications professional, all appointed by the governor with the consent of the council.
(h) The attorney general, or designee.