Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
To: Kelly.Ayotte@doj.nh.gov, Jeffery.Strelzin@doj.nh.gov, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, Andrew@RightToknowNH.org....
Quit trying to keep your superiors out of this loop. You're dealing with a former AAG so you know not to even insult my intelligence with that transparent attempt to insulate Kelly from liability. I put her and others right back in the distribution chain every time.
You have NOT fully responded to my inquiry because you ignored this:
a) an inventory report AND
b) the notes of the officers who viewed the Floyd
........So to be clear, are you telling me there were no contemporaneous or subsequent notes made about Floyd's vehicle? You know you've got a sociopath on your hands like Gregory Floyd who just shot a man dead and threatened one of your officers ("son, I'm quicker'n you") and whom the Easton Chief of Police was worried about but you don't take any notes regarding what's in his car?
Easton Police Chief Robery Every from your own files (that will be part of the lawsuit to be made public)
"All of us have made mistakes in our lives; in Mr. Floyd's case the behavior extends beyond a mistake; there is a pattern, a pattern of past violence, paranoid behavior and excessive anger. While no one can predict the future, I feel Mr. Floyd is capable of showing up at Lafayette Elementary School or at a neighbor's house with an automatic weapon..."
And you ignored this:
II: John P's request to have the State place all evidentiary materials on line.
By the way, have you responded to his request yet? Your office is contemptably, and suspiciously late on that.
...........Should I just add it to the litigation hopper that will likely include the recent request for any and all procedure and protocol for homicide investigations involving civilian and/or Law Enforcement personnel.
Attorney Mullen has responded to Fox Hill and requested 45 days but I'm hereby putting him on Actual Notice that I want whatever they've got RIGHT NOW, and if more is uncovered then they can supplement; I'll allow that certainly because I'm a nice, reasonable man.
Along with the redaction stunts I've seen from your files we're in for a rockin' time at oral argument, Counselor.
I'm up for it.
Lastly, I'm also in receipt of the email from Reconciliation member Gary Harwood to your office in which he directly tells you that your investigation is bogus. That will be printed in the comments section to my next blawg entry and will be made part of the file when I get ready to sue for Bruce McKay's personnel file.
Are we clear?
Very truly yours,
Christopher King, J.D.