31 December 2005

More thoughts on Marty & Charlie.

First off, here's another NAACP fuck-up from my home state, similar to these, also from Ohio.
Next up: You know Charlie Bauer (Suspended Jaffrey NH Police Chief Marty Dunn's lawyer in my civil case against him) immediately forwarded to Cheshire County Prosecutor Bill Albrecht a copy of the Injunctive Order (actually finding that I engaged unauthorized practice of law by passing this business card). Said Prosecutor, BTW, has been laboring under the false impression given to him by the NAACP Defendants Timmons and Levesque that the NAACP -- as an entity -- does not sue!!

But here's the thing about him sending that Order:
I don't give a shit. And Bauer and Attorney Andru Volinsky need to be more worried about whether their man -- who has been suspended from practice -- has a damn job at the end of the Day. If I ever go to trial out there we're going to have an actual copy of the CD of that all-important meeting between NAACP leaders, Willie Toney and Hannah Dunchas available -- and actually have Willie Toney's lady friend Hannah Dunchas on the stand -- along with the emails between Her/Willie Toney and me, instead of the bullshit hearsay affidavits the state successfully paraded before Judge Groff (with neither affiant being proved unavailable) earlier this month on that UPL claim. Their lies will not hold up.

Speaking of lies, here's yet another email that I found that Charlie Bauer lied about when he told the Court "That's the Universe!"

Also: I've heard the CD and I've already got Defendant Gloria Timmons testifying under Oath falsely during her Depo despite the fact that the Court extended her from 19 Sept. to 31 Oct. to prepare, which substantially wrecked my litigation strategy. So let's see what else stupid she'll say.

Blawg Yahtzee: A word about local NAACP's Black women

PS: Here's more news about police in New Hampshire.

King's Supplemental Memorandum contra dismissal

Here it is. Basically, the quoted law butresses my claim that it is axiomatic that cases be heard on the merits -- Particularly when Defendant Timmons got away without responding to Discovery Requests that the Court file clearly notes were served with the Complaint and were pending weeks past her 30 day window and Plaintiff's Motion for Default was not granted, even conditionally.

Blawg yahtzee: Timmon loses bogus "stalking case" (see also "Day in Nashua" video at the website).

30 December 2005

Charlie Bauer's "Universe" of lies:



Suspended Jaffrey NH Police Chief Dunn's attorney, Charlie Bauer has moved for Default Judgment against me for late discovery. Too bad I've been busy deciphering his realm of lies to respond in time, but I am curing that and will notice the Court of such fact later today. In Law, two things are axiomatic:
1) Cases must be heard on the merits unless there is contumacious activity on the part of a litigant(s);
2) A party moving for Judgment may not come with dirty hands. Bauer's hands are substantially stained, and here's why:

In a hearing after the court denied my subpoena for Attorney Bauer's emails between the two of us (and to remove him as counsel as a material witness) he stood up, on his own free will, and said to future New Hampshire Supreme Court Justice Gary E. Hicks, after producing a handful of Mickey-Mouse 'hi-how are you' emails:
"That's the Universe, your Honor."

That is a lie. Since that time Plaintiff has been rumaging through his emails (I do not use MS Outlook, as Attorney Bauer no doubt uses at work) so it takes a while (I had several email accounts) but here are some of the clearly relevant emails I have found that implicate not only Attorney Bauer but his client:

One. Two. Three.

And I bet I can find some more. And when I finish, I'm going to send them all to the Bar Association with this blawg entry for his unbridled lies and failure to adhere to the "candor toward the tribunal" Ethical Canons, Rules and Responsibilities. That will fit into the documentary quite nicely, as will the NAACP's 20 Jan email to me -- well after the 4 January correspondence with Chief Dunn, noting that Defendant Timmons thought that there "might not be any grounds to remove you," and that "You have been a go-getter right from the start," and "Everyone loves and support you."

Now back to my Memorandum Contra (1) & (2) single space version.

PS: I wonder if Attorney Bauer still wants the Court to read this blawg? Well it will, because this entry with attachments will be submitted later today.

29 December 2005

Willie Toney testifies and wins:

this is an audio post - click to play

Ladies and Gentlemen, I apologize for the sound 'quality' as Willie Toney describes his night of horror facing three (3) drawn undercover guns behind Mr. Mike's convenience store while he tried to take a pee.

The State should apologize for the legal 'quality'.

No Justice, No Peace.

King slips to 2-1 vs. Haters; Court slams him for Unauth. Practice of Law.

The Court, in a decision dated 28 December, that cited no law, and failed to address the law cited by King regarding the Best Evidence Rule and offers of proof, (i.e. State v. Poulicakos, 131 NH 709 (1989), found that King had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law.

At this point King has won the baseless "Stalking" hearing brought by NAACP President Gloria Timmons (see video "Day in Nashua" and hear audio "Stalking Trial" and the baseless attempt to have his bail revoked, but this loss he finds astonishing.

"This is remarkable and will be appealed," said King. "As I pointed out to the court on that day and in my Post Hearing Brief, the State knowingly failed to produce a tape or CD of the actual interview of Willie Toney and Hannah Dunchas, and neither affiant appeared in court for me to cross-examine them. Chief Dunn was right there but probably didn't take the stand because he thought I would bring up the fact that he is suspended from practice, himself. The State put on a Dog'n'Pony show, no doubt."

"As to Mr. Toney, the Best Evidence Rule clearly was violated and I will provide a copy of the CD to prove that he and Ms. Dunchas knew I was not a licensed attorney. As to Ms. Ellwood, there is no basis to believe that I would have told her that I had settled a huge case for the NAACP, or that I am engaged in the practice of law by my card, which I gave her and which contains no phone number, does not say that I practice law, and only points people to my website and weblawg, the focal point of which is the unreasonable suspension in Ohio -- with a letter relative thereto by ethics panel member Louis A. Jacobs noting that it was in part the product of 'racism, ignorance and reactionary politics.' This is a Dark Day for Justice."

King adds further "The fellow from a law firm who gave me Willie Toney's name on a matchbook warned me this morning when I told him a Decision was pending 'You're in New Hampshire, King.'"

"Courts lie," he added. "The Ohio Court went so far as to say that I had said my relationship with Attorney Jacobs had failed. Clearly that's bullshit. We had lunch all the time, we have mutual friends and look at his letter about me. Jesus, Christ."

King takes to the road for Justice.

Hillsborough South District Court refused to tell me or my lawyer, former Hillsborough lead prosecutor David Horan, the court's decision in the Unauthorized Practice of Law claim over the phone, so I'm going to interrupt my job-hunting to go get it myself. While I am there I will go to Attorney Horan's office to listen to the Willie Toney trial that they finally provided Attorney Horan, after months of waiting. And this is still not the full reports, just the trial so we get to know what that brother really told the court on his way to acquittal. I won't be in the VW, that car is long gone. But it would be perfect today.

Stay tuned.

Dunn fails to make blacks feel safe:

How safe do blacks really feel in the Monadnock area? I know I'm not feeling the love, at least from the certain elements. Neither does Renaissance Room co-owner Bill Perry, who held an MLK Day discussion about it while presently deposed Jaffrey Police Chief Martin Dunn looks the other way.
“But by-and-large, it’s been very easy to live here,” Perry said. “We have a friendly police force. But the police force in Jaffrey has not been as friendly. In Jaffrey, I’ve been stopped four times. I finally said you know, I don’t fit the profile of Jaffrey Center and I am being hassled by these people. I never got a ticket; I got kind of curiosity, like what are you doing here? But part of being black is you learn to live with white people.”
Says King, "Actually, I've never had much of a race problem personally, but I definitely feel that Chief Dunn hates a bright, self-confident black guy like me having a go at him. No doubt about it."

But remember: He started this whole thing instead of just telling me that there was a confidential reliable informant in the Willie Toney wrongful arrest/police abuse matter when I had issued the NAACP Demand/Letter, which I simultaneously shared with our Nashua office and Boston President Alkins on 25 & 26 December, 2004, to discover that as of 20 Jan, 2005 -- well after Chief Dunn complained to the NAACP on 4 January, 2005 -- they still "loved and supported me." Until Chief Dunn brought that whip down, that is. Now NAACP & Chief Dunn are busom buddies, despite the fact that I had long since offered to talk with him at class (scroll down), and I had in fact directly referenced the Police Reports in the Demand Letter, so where he says NAACP issued a Demand Letter without research, that would be a gosh-darned lie.

28 December 2005

Dunn suspension part deux: "Put up or shut up!"

Presently deposed Jaffrey, NH Police Chief Dunn certainly likes the word "transgressions." He used it against both City Manager Jon Sistare and me, when he published information to 3rd parties as a matter of fact that I was mentally disturbed. Read this and this. In the current Jaffrey situation where he is suspended, he says:

Selectmen “know I’ve made verbal and written complaints to them on several occasions regarding Mr. Sistare’s transgressions,” [Dunn] said. (Editor: I wonder if those complaints are an exercise of Chief Dunn's First Amendment?).

Whatever the case, City Selectman Hollister is not missing Ol' Boy too much; not feelin' the Love anymore:
“The police department is being very well-run by acting Chief Oswalt,” he said Wednesday. “They’re meeting all the needs and requirements of the town.”

And regarding the packet of information that Dunn's wife claims he is about to file against City Manager Sistare (read post below), Selectman Sterling was equally harsh:

“We have not seen anything from Mr. Dunn since he’s been on leave... to back up or even to make any allegations against Mr. Sistare,” Sterling said.

“(Dunn’s) had ample time: I’m telling him: Put up or shut up,” Sterling said.

Now here's what I'm telling all of you out there: What's funny is that Dunn's attorney -- Andru Volinksy -- is actually one of the lawyers I called to help with Willie Toney's case back in The Day, as I just notified them via my discovery responses. Just get my narrow black ass out of New Hampshire and I'll promise only to return to ski. Promise. Scout's honor.

PS: On a somewhat related note, we do know that Chief Dunn's buddy, former Cheshire County Prosecutor and former NH Chief Attorney General Peter Heed was drummed out of office for sexual misconduct, regardless of whether he may have been a patsy for Craig Benson.
Just who are these people to question my integrity?

Blawg yahtzee: Chief Dunn hates this entry; he said so at his Depo. He thinks I'm all pornographic and sh*t. Funny though: Unlike Attorney Heed, I never had to leave any job because of my sexual indiscretions.

Dunn suspension part deux: "Put up or shut up!"

Presently deposed Jaffrey, NH Police Chief Dunn certainly likes the word "transgressions." He used it against both City Manager Jon Sistare and me, when he published information to 3rd parties as a matter of fact that I was mentally disturbed. Read this and this. In the current Jaffrey situation where he is suspended, he says:

Selectmen “know I’ve made verbal and written complaints to them on several occasions regarding Mr. Sistare’s transgressions,” [Dunn] said. (Editor: I wonder if those complaints are an exercise of Chief Dunn's First Amendment).

Whatever the case, City Selectman Hollister is not missing Ol' Boy too much; not feelin' the Love anymore:
“The police department is being very well-run by acting Chief Oswalt,” he said Wednesday. “They’re meeting all the needs and requirements of the town.”

And regarding the packet of information that Dunn's wife claims he is about to file against City Manager Sistare (read post below), Selectman Sterling was equally harsh:

“We have not seen anything from Mr. Dunn since he’s been on leave ... to back up or even to make any allegations against Mr. Sistare,” Sterling said.

“(Dunn’s) had ample time ... I’m telling him: Put up or shut up,” Sterling said.

Now here's what I'm telling all of you out there: What's funny is that Dunn's attorney -- Andru Volinksy -- is actually one of the lawyers I called to help with Willie Toney's case back in The Day, as I just notified them via my discovery responses. Just get my narrow black ass out of New Hampshire and I'll promise only to return to ski. Promise. Scout's honor.

PS: On a somewhat related note, we do know that Chief Dunn's buddy, former Cheshire County Prosecutor and former NH Chief Attorney General Peter Heed was drummed out of office for sexual misconduct, regardless of whether he may have been a patsy for Craig Benson.
Just who are these people to question my integrity?

Blaw yahtzee: Chief Dunn hates this entry; he said so at his Depo. He thinks I'm all pornographic and sh*t.
this is an audio post - click to play

Chief Dunn suspended; Union Leader tells half of the story.

this is an audio post - click to play
Chief Dunn, who likes to photograph me for some reason (listen to "closing argument") has been suspended with pay pending whatever. Notice how the Union Leader piece (which I'll scan later because they don't maintain them) fails to mention my side of the story whatsoever, which is why I have this blawg. They didn't even mention my civil suit against him, but for some reason the Union Leader references my suspension in Ohio for "unethical behavior."

I strongly advise you to read the "King is Ethical" button over at the website: That case was bullshit, and I recommend you read Professor Lou Jacobs' letter about me for more background there. Lou was on the ethics panel, BTW.

Viva technology: A fellow blogger who thinks I'm being screwed notified me of this.

As to the Union Leader, my film maker has reporter Steve Seitz in my "Movie Trailer" video taking notes talking with me at the end of the trailer, immediately after he interviewed Willie Toney, who set him straight about his opinion of me (All Good) and the NAACP and Chief Dunn (All Bad). Watch me walk and talk with Mr. Toney in the same damn video. Seitz told me he forwarded the story but it never ran.

As I said, my movie gets better every day. I wonder if Chief Dunn now knows what it feels like to be wrongly accused of something? Perhaps we could break bread over it. Heck, I already offered him and the NAACP to meet me at the Dalai Lama presenation, but they pretty much told me to go to hell.

PS for opposing counsel, since I know you read every inch of this blawg: My initial responses to your discovery queries will go out first thing in the morning, with tracking numbers.

No Justice, No Peace.

PPS1: Keene Sentinel has a story available only to subscribers that teases: Accusations fly in Jaffrey Many upset as police chief investigation enters third week:
JAFFREY — Patience is waning in Jaffrey, with an investigation into suspended Police Chief Martin J. Dunn continuing into a third week....

If you think I'm going to actually pay for this rag you've got another thing coming, after they refused my requested correction/retraction, instead making it seem like I was going to actually kill someone. Unbelievable.

Anyway, Dunn and City Manager Jon Sistare did not always disagree as seen here, but one time Jon promised me FOIA documents and Dunn told him "no" and later we see Dunn hiding Rule 98 info from me at his damn Deposition. Yeah I've got the damn emails cached. Whoa!!!!!! In fact, look what I just found after Marty told Jon not to give me the rest of Willie Toney's police report:

Here is the story about the youth coordinator that quit:

PPS2: I wonder if Dunn's attorney, Charlie Bauer, still wants the Court to read my blawg.
this is an audio post - click to play
this is an audio post - click to play

This blawg is admissible at trial:

this is an audio post - click to play

First of all, it's a diary, and it contains entries showing my state of mind prior to indictment. See generally Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School Dist.,
143 NH 331, 733 A.2d 394, 1999. Ummm.... with Devine-Millimet (NAACP's first lawyers who bailed) on lead and who but coincidentally -- or perhaps not -- Orr & Reno on amicus for Defendants, dammit. I told them I would use all of their cases against them, so here we go!

You thankin' with me you thankin' with the best!

Second, Attorney Bauer wants the Court to read it.
Third, blogs have been found admissible as seen here, as discussed here on the Volokh Conspiracy blog.

I contend it is admissible for these reasons:
1. State of mind prior to indictment;
2. To show the impact Defendants' actions have had on me over the past several months;
3. To counter allegations of unprofessional conduct by showing examples of their hypocritical nature, and to show them as unprofessional as well;
4. To show that I have continually been an open book about any and all salient aspects of these cases.
5. To show what they are retaliating against me for, including Timmons' stalking case and the attempt to revoke my bail using items that weren't even sent to my correct address (scroll down).

"Bring whatever it is you've got," invites King to opposing counsel. "Because I'm going to open up my entire professional world, and my observations about the NAACP and the Defendants in this case for the criminal and civil juries, and I'm going to specifically ask that the court grant the jury supervised access to this blawg. Moroever, to the extent that they try to portray me as mean, discourteous or in any other way unprofessional, there are plenty of examples that can even been seen on video or in stills where we can see the truth here and here."

27 December 2005

this is an audio post - click to play

Today's NAACP encourages lynching:

this is an audio post - click to play

this is an audio post - click to play
Listen to the case law I cite in this audioblawg and reach the inescapable conclusion that the NAACP has lost its way, and Mamie Till is rolling in her grave.

For more discourse on this subject -- even when people dissent in part with me, they certainly don't agree with the State of NH or local NAACP:


Blawg yahtzee: My ignored Complaint to NAACP LDF
this is an audio post - click to play
this is an audio post - click to play

SAAB exposes NAACP Portland sellout?

this is an audio post - click to play

this is an audio post - click to play
UPDATES FIRST: Read this 27 Feb '06 blawg entry and the comment.

Well folks I've got it on the QT from a SAAB buddy of mine that Portland Maine's NAACP office pushed a too-strong brother out of office back around the time I was born. This individual, who shall remain anonymous for fear of reprisal, gleans his knowledge from the Portland Press Herald, the Portland Evening Express and the American Journal. Let's see what he can dig up about this mamby-pamby "organization" they call America's "Oldest Civil Rights Organization."

Now read here the NAACP v. Claiborne case to see WWRND (What Would Real Nigguh's Do?), i.e. "If we catch any of you going in any of them racist stores, we're going to break your damn neck."

Blawg yahtzee: Closing Arguments one and two.

PS: Some interesting graphics work sure is totally going on in Europe.

NOTE: Parody. I'm not trying to have anyone's legs broken, but they are trying to get me locked up to I can have my ass reamed; they actually think it's funny. I'm not down with any of that.

26 December 2005

this is an audio post - click to play
this is an audio post - click to play

New "Virtual Court" rules allow King time to chill:

this is an audio post - click to play

26 Dec 2005 For Immediate Release:
Recently-enacted NH proviso #05-6969 as codified now permits litigants the option of "trial by blawg," such that they need not waste valuable time and natural resources to actually appear in court:

"This is great," said King. "I'm chillin' out here with Hef and Weezer at the mansion.... just gonna' handle things from here, Man."

King reminds us that he's already got his closing argument set up and much of the relevant Deposition Testimony is online, so he's good-to-go:

"Remember how Kraftwerk threatened not to actually appear for tour -- just send dummies and a soundtrack? Well there you go.... Fun auf der Autobahn," said the embattled Civil Rights activist.

Blawg yahtzee: "This case is a cartoon!"

NOTE: Parody. King will obey all rules of Court.
this is an audio post - click to play

Closing Argument.

this is an audio post - click to play

That's all she wrote, folks: Similar to what Arthur said to me personally, and to the World in general, about Mac: "a nick here, a cut there......and pretty soon they've bled to death."

I can't do it like a pro on a tennis court, but I can do it right here in this court.

Blawg yahtzee: Lou Jacobs' letter.

PS: The gub'ment can get away with a lot of things it shouldn't. (Lower right click to expand).
this is an audio post - click to play
this is an audio post - click to play
this is an audio post - click to play

25 December 2005

Why was Boston NAACP Pres. Lenny Alkins deleting my emails?

See how nicely Lenny Drives the car for massuh'? Better stay between them white lines, my nigguh'.
Blawg Yahtzee: 13 Dec. '05.
this is an audio post - click to play

124
2 MR. BAUER: Objection to the form.
3 A. I'm going to tell you again. Lenny
4 told me he deleted everything you sent him.
5 I don't have a clue if you sent it to him,
6 I really don't. I can't answer that
7 question. He deleted anything with your name
8 on it, --
9 Q. Okay. Thank you.
10 A. -- as most people would.
11 Q. Move to strike as nonresponsive.
186
16 Q. Let the record reflect that I've
17 tendered a -- an e-mail, dated Sunday, 26
18 January from Nashua NAACP legal to
19 president.naacpbostonbranch@verizon.net and to
20 Attorney Wilson @law.com.
21 A. Mm-hmm.
22 Q. And.
23 MS. PROULX: I'm sorry. You said
24 January 26th. Did you mean December?
25 Q. Yes. Thank you. Subject forward

187
1
2 pending civil rights matter regarding Toney
3 versus City of Jaffrey.
4 A. Mm-hmm.
5 Q. Happy New Year, Gentlemen. I'm
6 hoping to make it a good one for Mr. Toney,
7 which in turn will result in a big boost for
8 the chapter. Do I indicate anywhere on this
9 e-mail that I was anticipating personally
10 receiving money for Mr. Toney?
11 A. This is 26th of December, right?
12 Q. Correct.
13 A. This letter was issued -- it went to
14 the Nashua legal, which we didn't get a
15 copy. It went to you. It went to
16 chrystobal, which is you, it went to the
17 president NAACP, who deleted all mail. The
18 only one who got that was you and Mr.
19 Wilson.
.....
188
21 Q. Did Mr. Alkins ever tell you that I
22 had approached him for employment because I
23 was unlicensed?
24 A. Mr. Alkins told me buyer beware and
25 would not talk about you at all. You had

189
1
2 asked me a question, and I'm explaining it
3 to you. Mr. Alkins, he told me he deleted
4 anything that come from you because you were
5 bombarding him with e-mails. He didn't have
6 time. Secondly, he told me buyer beware, so
7 to speak, and I told you that before. And
8 that's a -- 189
9 Q. Okay.

Query, why the hell was Lenny deleting my emails? He had recommended/me to the Nashua Chapter..... Anyway, the nice white man (Corey Surett) over at the DOL returned my calls and we made something happen over at American Tower.
"No time" to read about racial discrimination? See blawg yahtzee, supra.

PS: No offense, Morgan. You were just playing a role.
But this is how Lenny lives his NAACP life, like a scared bug-eyed negro of the Reconstruction Era:
Lenny, did American Tower buy you out because Joanne Treshel, Esq., my first boss, told me as you can see in the video "American Tower #1" that they were at one point actually scared of you sellouts. What, you done went and got yourself a new E-Class Benzo out there in the driveway, nigguh'?

Some guidance for Attorney Proulx:

this is an audio post - click to play
Just a simple but important issue as to what was in the Legal Updates, which I emailed to Sec'y Claire Holston on 3 or 4 Jan and which I contend clearly showed:
a) my father's case update as a simple letter of referral to the appropriate region regarding his 37 years of service at Diamond Alkali/Ricerca. The NAACP referral attorney took his money without a contract and only Defended one Deposition before bailing and never returning our phone calls and:
b) the commentary about the Willie Toney $65K Demand Letter.

Blawg yahtzee: 4 Nov. '05

89
21 Q. Okay. Ms. Timmons, --
22 A. Mm-hmm.
23 Q. -- do you have any reason to believe
24 that this is not an accurate depiction of my
25 report for January 3rd, 2005?

90
1
2 A. Yes.
3 Q. And what's that basis?
4 A. It's based on this is not the
5 document that was presented by the secretary.
6 This is a rendition of what was given to me
7 originally. This is not, and I didn't get
8 that until January -- late January. This
9 document is new.
10 Q. Well, Ma'am, first off, let's get
11 into this. Why is it that you didn't get a
12 copy of legal updates for the 3rd of January
13 until late January?
14 A. I said I didn't read this until --
15 the one I did get was late January, and it
16 wasn't this copy. It was not this
17 particular copy.
18 MR. BAUER: She wasn't done
19 testifying.
20 Q. It's a two-part question, Sir. I'm
21 still addressing the first part.
22 MR. BAUER: Mr. King, --
23 MR. KING: Mr. Bauer, --
24 MR. BAUER: She was not done with
25 her answer. Please don't interrupt her.

91
1
2 MR. KING: I'm not, Mr. Bauer. I'm
3 directing her attention to the first part of
4 the question.
5 MR. BAUER: Do you have more to
6 say?
7 THE WITNESS: Yes. Thank you.
8 This document was not given to me.
9 BY-MR.KING:
10 Q. Are you representing her, Mr. Bauer?
11 MR. BAUER: No. I'm trying to
12 create a good record for the Court.
13 MR. KING: As am I.
14 MS. PROULX: She's not done
15 testifying. Let her finish her answer, then
16 you can pose another question.
17 THE WITNESS: I did not get this
18 whole thing. I didn't get this at all
19 because it's not what I originally got.
20 What I originally got was a legal update.
21 The bold was not on it. Your update from
22 December 16th is totally different from this
23 update, January 3rd, when I went into your
24 e-mail account and closed it down, and I --
25 I got a lot of documentation that was not

92
1
2 this. So therefore you must have updated it
3 at your own convenience.

4 BY-MR.KING:
5 Q. So -- that's your opinion, Ma'am.
6 So if I have a standing e-mail with an
7 attachment on it that proves you use -- that
8 shows up like this one, then you would be
9 wrong, correct?

10 A. No.
11 MS. PROULX: I'm going to object as
12 to the form. Assuming facts not in
13 evidence.


......But not for long:

152
24 Q. Okay. All right. Earlier you --
25 you stated there was some confusion over the

153
1
2 -- how the January 3rd updates appeared?
3 A. Mm-hmm.
4 Q. I indicate that upon going home the
5 next day, I sent the exhibit that we were
6 looking at earlier, the legal updates that we
7 were looking at earlier, which I marked as
8 Exhibit --
9 MR. WILSON: 10.
10 Q. -- 10.
11 MR. KING: Okay. I am now going to
12 produce for you what I have just printed off
13 at the library in front of Mr. Wilson.

14 Sorry. I'm busy gathering all these
15 documents. So this will be Exhibit-19.

............ Presto! Facts now in evidence:
158
8 MS. PROULX: Can we just stop for
9 one second?
10 MR. KING: Yes.
11 MS. PROULX: Are Exhibit-10 and the
12 legal updates that you just attached to
13 Exhibit-19 the same document?
14 MR. KING: That is my whole point.
15 They are exactly the same.

16 MS. PROULX: I just wanted to make
17 sure.
18 MR. KING: I think the record will
19 show that they are exactly the same. All
20 right. I'm done with that exhibit.

........and remember, Claire Holston read the emails every day!
19
13 Q. Okay. Whose responsibility was it
14 to check the e-mails coming into Nashua
15 NAACP?
16 A. NAACP while I was there? Claire.
17 Q. Okay. How often -- did you all set
18 up any strict time lines for how often she
19 should check that e-mail?
20 A. She would check that e-mail daily.

Get it? When I go back to retrieve Exhibit 19 at trial in front of a Jury on a computer screen it's going to show that the damn attachment is exactly as I contended, and that it includes the Willie Toney $65K reference and the issue about my father's case where that NAACP referral attorney screwed up his case. That's why they hate me now, even though they supported me weeks after they knew about the Demand Letter! That's why they don't want these transcripts on line. Wait until I get the money for Chief Dunn's Depo. It's worse, much uglier for them. The Truth hurts sometimes, so instead they want to make my ass hurt by putting me in prison.

I'm not down with that.

Selective Memory for Timmons?

Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, the witness is lying: We talked all about her litigation with her employer and I hand-delivered documents to her about my suspension in Ohio and American Tower Corporation -- at her place of employment, thank you. Told her I was limited in what I could do to help her because of my suspension status, thank you. We did talk about whether her settlement could be couched in a workers' comp arrangement, though. Straight up.

Blawg yahtzee: 30 Nov. 2005.

25 Q. Hmm. Do you recall me ever coming

46
1
2 to your work to tell you about my case with
3 American Tower?
4 A. No.
5 Q. Really? Did you and I ever talk at
6 your work about job opportunities for me?
7 A. No.
8 Q. Really? Did you ever send me any
9 e-mails about job opportunities?
10 A. Yes. I send everybody e-mails about
11 job opportunities, so, yes. I probably would
12 have sent you job opportunities as well.
13 Q. So you and I never talked about any
14 -- did you and I ever meet at work?
15 MS. PROULX: Objection.
16 Q. Withdrawn.
17 MS. PROULX: That was two.
18 Q. Did you and I ever meet at your
19 work?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. What do you remember talking about
22 when we met at your work?
23 A. NAACP.
24 Q. Did we ever talk about your
25 litigation with your employer?

47
1
2 A. No.
3 Q. How do I know about it?
4 A. I don't know.
5 Q. Mm-hmm. Did you settle your case
6 with your employer?
7 MS. PROULX: I'm going to object.
8 That information is confidential. I'm going
9 to instruct the witness not to answer.
10 Q. Subject to the restraints of a
11 protective order, Ma'am, did you ever settle
12 your case with your employer?
13 MS. PROULX: I'm going object. It's
14 privileged information. I'm going to
15 instruct the witness not to answer.
16 Q. But you did have a case of racial
17 discrimination against your employer, correct?
18 MS. PROULX: I'm going to object.
19 Privileged information. Do not answer that
20 question. Thank you.
21 Q. We'll note that for the -- the --
22 for the record. Well, Ma'am, if I know
23 about your lawsuit with your litigation with
24 your employer, and you didn't tell me about
25 it, do you have any idea who did?

48
1
2 MR. BAUER: Objection.
3 MS. PROULX: I'm going to object and
4 instruct the witness not to answer anything
5 about any pending matters with her employer.
6 Q. Ma'am, do you recall asking me for
7 -- me for help on your case with your
8 employer?
9 MR. BAUER: Objection.
10 A. No.
11 MS. PROULX: I'm going to --
12 A. That's not true. Sorry.
13 Q. So if I tell you today that I told
14 you I couldn't -- I could only discuss
15 things with your attorneys because I wasn't
16 licensed, then I would be lying?
17 MS. PROULX: I'm going to object.
18 Do not answer any questions with pending --
19 whether there is or is not a suit, do not
20 answer. And I would ask you to move on,
21 please.
22 MR. KING: It's my deposition. I'll
23 move on when I'm good and ready.

PS: More Timmons Depo. testimony appears above when I question why Boston Pres. Lenny Alkins deleted my emails about Federal Court ORDERS to produce evidence in a race/overtime retaliation case involving American Tower Corporation.

Tennis Heirarchy

Okay, Terry Overbey used to whip us blindfolded with a cigarette in his mouth in high school. Note: I mean a lit, burning cigarette he was actually smoking. Okay, so he wasn't actually blindfolded but he probably could have done that, too.

So he recently gets beat 4 & 2 by a dude Manuel Ortiz who gets beat at another tournament 2 & 3 by eventual National 40's winner Peter Smith. Federer? Fuggitaboutit. BTW you tuff-guyz out there actually think you can beat the Williams sisters? Unless you're top level college, you... won't.

When I was on my best game it took everything to stay on the court with Georgia Dog standout Jane Cohodes, and the Williams sisters would in turn wipe up the court with her.

Good vs. Evil?

Who is good? Who is evil? Who is right? Who is wrong? They definitely say that I am evil; a lawbreaker. A felon.

Meanwhile, a haiku:

Taste Love on my face
Prisons cannot crush spirit
See hate on Marty.

Lastly, they will come after you regardless of race if you piss them off by questioning integrity: N.E. Ohio blawg Erie Voices got in trouble after they criticized the same judge (Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Moyer) who presided over my dog'n'pony disciplinary process.

In the Erie Voices case: "The trial for Baumgartner and DuBois is scheduled to begin Oct. 26 but whenever a jurisdictional challenge to the prosecution is raised as is in this case which centers around the free speech rights of bloggers and the right to criticize public officials, then all proceedings must be stayed until the jurisdictional challenge is resolved."

"The overwhelming constitutional argument in the entire case which centers on First Amendments rights is whether the government can criminalize a person's exercise of free speech in criticizing public officers." See Supreme Court cases 1 & 2 & 3.

The U.S. is still a dangerous place for people with big mouths. Nothing new there. Dig w'happens to the writer I just quoted:

24 December 2005

Merry Christmas!

this is an audio post - click to play
For those of you of the Christian persuasion, of course.

Blawg Yahtzee: 28 June.

PS: Why I love Gang of Four; hung out with their touring party including Euroglider Amanda Vincent after their brief tour with Public Enemy(click on "anti-nigga' machine"). Listen to "Ode to Marty & Gloria" 29 Nov. '05. As you know, I also dig Beck, who with REM's Michael Stipe and others, is involved in some remix action.

Working title of the new album: The Embarrassment of Paleface.