31 October 2005

Timmons Depo. update: On 1st Amendment hold; King v. Dunn Depo next up 18 Nov.



She said some straight-up ignorant things today that any rational person will find entirely unbelievable, and there will be Motions filed for refusal to answer certain crucial questions. However, the blow-by-blow report is on hold pending Chief Dunn's attorney's question to me afterward: "This is all confidential, with respect to your website, correct?" to which I responded "I hadn't thought much about it, actually but I would hate to think that the Court would have circumscribed my First Amendment Rights to talk about what happened here today." Or any day for that matter. The record is what it is, so why try to hide it, I wonder?

He said: "I would hate to see you in violation of Judge Hicks' Order."
I said: "Me, too -- but if it prohibits me from reporting what Defendant Timmons said today (in a Civil case indirectly involving my liberty interests, no less) I'm going to file an Interlocutory First Amendment Appeal." See Thomson v. Cash, 117 NH 653 (1977).

I am deciding whether to expedite the transcript or not. The extra money could be better used for Chief Dunn's Deposition, scheduled for Friday, 18 Oct. 2005.

PS: Me: "We gotta get rid of this 'no phone contact' rule you guys started. Scheduling Depos could be a lot easier without that... (I look at his keys)... You drive a SAAB, I drive a SAAB, can't we be civil enough to handle that?" Attorney Bauer did not at such time agree to approach the Court to remove this restriction that he and Attorneys Van Oot and Proulx sought and obtained.

PPS1: I will say this, based on independent observations: NAACP Bylaws in no way circumscribe a Legal Redress Chair's First Amendment Rights to issue a Demand Letter. And Timmons' testimony was in no way inconsistent with her prior testimony, including that she (now) has a notary seal on a document that was previously-written by Cleaven Ferguson that allegedly contradicts one that I have, along with the mean-spirited "you need to get a job... because if you had a 9-5 you wouldn't be doing this stuff." Which of course provides me all the incentive in the World not to get a 9-5, like when I was an Assistant Ohio Attorney General, learning all about our fine system of Justice.

PPS2: The material lies she may have uttered yeserday will await a likely Motion for Perjury after I clean up the noise in the dialogue on the Willie Toney interview CD that Chief Dunn/Jaffrey PD finally provided after many months of waiting.

Now back to my Motion for Clarification on this issue (including this blawg piece); Timmons Discovery Requests and Chief Dunn Depo. preparation. Unlike yesterday, when I was a bit rusty, I'm gonna be tack-sharp for Chief Dunn.

Proof that Timmons' Stalking claim is bogus:

Take a look at the brief Memorandum I filed this morning, along with a set of Deposition Questions that will appear online later today: How come she is the only one who claims to be threatened, bringing up the proverbial "Roast you and Nashua NAACP VP Melanie Levesque like rotisserie hogs" blawg, when neither Levesque or their/attorneys have filed for protection?

Now let's see if they run and file, post hoc style.

29 October 2005

NH DHHS Supe. to King's rescue!

Hey Gloria: Why don't you explain how I would tell Dep't of Human Services Director Sylvia Gale that I "hadn't been licensed for 4 or 5 years," a whole month before the Demand Letter to Chief Dunn (1) & (2) ; then network her with the NAACP and then lie to the NAACP about my license while preparing a movie, book, and website that all discuss it? Hold your answer until Monday, then do your best you big fat liar. Only this time the lie doesn't kill thousands of U.S. Soldiers and Iraqi civilians, it just puts one hapless nigger under threat of prison. Shame on you, honey. See you Monday.

The Closing Argument of an American.

this is an audio post - click to play
4 the haters
At 59 mins: into the "stalking" hearing NAACP Nashua President Timmons brought against me solely because of my Internet activities, I note:
“I’m just doing my media thing now and she doesn’t like it because the truth is coming out. This Country was built on the ideals of the First Amendment and the Internet is the last bastion of the First Amendment for people who need to get a word out.

Now if she believes I have defamed her, then you know what she can do? She can go file a Complaint. But she can remove this case, because there is no physical threat to her…. I am a peace-loving individual never before charged with any restraining order or violent crime I’m 40 years old and have worked with peace groups.….. I am more of a Buddhist than anything else; I only kill flies and mosquitoes. This is ridiculous....

...What’s getting at Ms. Timmons is me opening my mouth. She knows I’m not going to hurt her physically; that’s ridiculous. I will continue to exercise my First Amendment Rights and communication as none of it is violent or life-threatening to the Plaintiff, and lastly very important for the Court to know, your Honor, is that if and when anybody asks me not to be on an email distribution list, I immediately excise them. That’s the Law.”
Notice how the "open" sign appears next to my mind: This is 2005, people, and we are still imbued with Certain Inalienable Rights.

PS: Timmons at 1:15:02 "I don't want this guy to videotape me. This guy is leaving the courtroom first at [King's] instruction to videotape me. This guy is dangerous!" Whereupon we got some good images of Ms. Timmons. Hint: They always look up when they get to the car. Never fails.

28 October 2005

"Stalking" Trial online: Timmons at 25 minutes: "You are a Dangerous Man!"

The best stuff is at 24-42 mins, and also my testimony at 54 minutes and you can hear my professionalism and her pointless case at my website link, "Stalking Trial." At no point have I done anything that could fairly be perceived as physically-threatening to Gloria Timmons or her family. She actually said I "threatened to go to her place of employment" to hurt her. All of this is nonsense as noted yesterday, for which she will address on Monday at her Deposition. All weekend long I will prepare for this Grand Occasion. Scary Halloween for Gloria, it will be.

"Strange that a person would go that far....(my blawg)" Well Gloria, if you and VP Melanie Levesque wouldn't have lied and told Jaffrey and Cheshire County officials that the "NAACP doesn't sue, or threaten to sue any party," resulting in me facing seven (7) years in prison, we wouldn't be here. See Exhibits (1), (2), (3) and (4) the NAACP Internal Memoranda granting individual units the right to sue, and a copy of an 11 Oct. page from this blawg discussing, inter alia, NAACP v. Town of East Haven, 259 F.3d 113 (C.A.Conn. 2001), and a copy of a story from "Brown Watch," noting a $50M NAACP lawsuit for excessive force in another venue.

PS: Notice the smiley-guy on the dashboard of the SAAB: He contains a special nuk-u-lar dirty-bomb disseminator I will use to bomb Ms. Timmons and her family. Not.

Back to jailed reporter Judith Miller:

See 5 Oct. post showing my support for Miller's First Amendment reporter's privilege not to divulge an information source, as protecting America's derivative First Amendment Rights to receive valuable information from the press -- America's Fourth Estate. It now appears in today's Washington Post A/P story, "GOP Senator Links Indictment, Resignation," however, that NYTimes is stepping away from Miller, and there are allegations that "Ms. Runamok" lied to, and withheld information from her superiors.

If that is true, and if that "entanglement" turns out to be nefarious, then she is no better than deposed NYTimes Golden Boy Jayson Blair, or New Republic pathological liar Stephen Glass (what a movie, though) and perhaps she should be serving time for Obstruction and/or Contempt if -- as her managing editor alleges -- she actually had improper entanglements (whatever that is) with VP Cheney's Chief of Staff Scooter Libby. As a former reporter I will say this: Don't lie to your managers. It makes everything look bad. Time will tell.

What we do know at this time is that the White House was busy pumping out mad propaganda about WMD that simply wasn't true, and even this morning we heard Dubya using Iraq, Al Qaeda and 911 in the same breath, even though the 9/11 Commission has found no link to this very day. Interessant, n'est-ce pas?

PS: This just in: "Scooter" scoots. Don't let that doorknob hitcha'. The real question, of course, is for whom you are covering?

27 October 2005

Timmons v. King "Stalking Order" MPEG file ready; She is an embarrassment to the NAACP

Here is the receipt; my crew still had to finesse a few things with the CD/Mpeg to make it play for millions but that has been completed. It's 1:17 long, but just about any portion of it will convince you that Gloria Timmons is an embarrassment to herself and to the NAACP; singularly inarticulate and disrespectful to the Court, and to me. Some compatability issues, but it should up up by tomorrow. Peace.
[9 Feb. 2006 Note: It's audio #1 at the website].

PS: The best part is at 25 mins. to 33 mins., involving the "Rotillery Pigs" (sic) according to Defendant Timmons. See the "Rotisserie Hogs" blawg of 16 October wherein I told her that she and NAACP VP Levesque would "roast like rotisserie hogs" under the cross examination of my attorneys.

PPS1: At 36 minutes she says "you're not that clever, King." Which was stricken at my request, as she was trying to say that if she receives any information on my blawg about her, through any means, that she is entitled to receive a Restraining Order because of physical fear, under the Statute.

PPS2: 38:20 minutes -- Court: "These emails..... that are allegedly directed toward you, are you included on the distribution or carbon copy list?"...... Me: "I'm a First Amendment scholar your Honor and I would never do that.". Gloria:......"He sends them to other members of the NAACP knowingly that I would get it. He's trying to make a mockery of the NAACP and the Courts." [Update 10 Feb. 2006: No Gloria, that would be you and your buddy in Jaffrey].

PPS3: 42 minutes.... Court: Are you aware of any law holding that the President of the NAACP is a public figure? Me: Your Honor that's highly relevant as to what I can say about her." Court: "That's not... that's beyond the scope of her expertise.... all that's been established is that she works there." Me: "Ms. Timmons what is your position at the NAACP?" Gloria: "I'm the president." Me: "Thank you."

[Update 10 Feb 2006]. I crushed her and the NAACP at that hearing.

Jamiroquai, King rock the house!

Last Saturday proved to be an off-the-chain experience down at Caprice Boston and Underbar, with post-show Jamiroquai in the house. I did not have a copy of my DVD "American Lawyer: A First Amendment Fiasco" with me to give them as I did with Moby (21 Oct.) but it was cool. Met some nice peeps; put the Word out, baby. Many thanks to Underbar and my boys at Next Generation Productions: DJs MAS & C-Nyce pictured; doin' it to you in your eardrums!

Timmons blurts: "You doesn't have a job!"


Or words of substantially similar import at 53:20 of the audio at my website "Stalking Trial." Her grammar really is quite poor, as is her knowledge of legal precepts and her credibility, as you see when you read this Post Hearing Brief. She opened this nonsense in a very public manner on media represented by her lawyers, now she falsely accuses me of physically threatening her and her family, when really she's all bent out of shape because of this flier that she produced to the Court yesterday. When asked what part of that flier was physically threatening, she had no real reply at all, like a 1980's Gensis song (with Earth, Wind & Fire -- one of the best musical groups, ever -- on horns, BTW).

PS: Actually Gloria, get yer facts straight, for once: I work for a law firm, among other things since your lies and deceit resulted in me stepping down as Principal of the HELP Organization -- which I structured -- to benefit at-risk youth in New Hampshire. I'm sure the kids thank you for that, Gloria. As long as you preserve your fiefdom at all costs, you couldn't care less about really helping people except your own family members. See "My 'scam' in Hartford: Helping Gloria's Sister."

"You're so obese only black men will like you"

Let's get a grip, here folks. Dr. Terry Bennett's comments, in lilly-white New Hampshire, are not the same as a doctor telling a skinny black woman, "you're so skinny only white boys will like you," and if you can't see that, or comprehend why it's different in a context like this, you may be cursed with another physical ailment beyond the Good Doctor's bailiwick: Myopia.

Having dated leggy blondes to short brunettes and women of many body compositions between 4'10" to 6'2" and in between, I appreciate all sorts of women. But apparently some white professionals in the "Live Free or Die" state don't appreciate black men appreciating white women in that way because he used it as a scare tactic. Well that's pretty scary to me, folks, so I'm gonna file a complaint with the Seacoast Branch of the NAACP later today. Peace.

PS: His speech is not entirely protected by the First Amendment, as mine was and is in Jaffrey, New Hampshire. He relinquished a degree of his First Amendment Rights by agreeing to be subject to a regulatory board -- and he may even be governed by commercial, rather than general, Free Speech doctrines. I, on the other hand, was exercising a Fundamental right as a free negro (or caucasian) citizen to seek redress for a man who faced three (3) drawn guns, arrest and a body cavity search from undercover police who rousted him and eventually charged him with "loitering," which he beat. See my 16 Oct. blawg, "Open Complaint to NAACP Legal Defense Fund," which still has not been answered substantively.

26 October 2005

Timmons, open Court: "You are a dangerous man"

Q: "What evidence do you have before you in court today that your family is in physical peril?"
A: "You are a dangerous man."

Gloria, you ain't never lied.... well at least this time. I'm very dangerous when I expose corrupt people and institutions. But I'm not physically dangerous nor am I an extortionist. You are upset that I published on my blawg that my lawyers would roast you and Melanie Levesque up like rotisserie hogs at trial, but you don't even know the meaning of the words metaphor, simile, parody or the implications of the 1988 U.S. Supreme Court case Falwell v. Hustler, so dismiss your bogus "Stalking" TRO against me. Then let's Get Real about what you and Melanie Levesque owe me for telling Chief Dunn and Prosecutor Albrecht that I am an extortionist, and that "the NAACP does not sue, or threaten to sue any party," when the bylaws specifically grant authority to individual units to engage in litigation, just as the Court noted in NAACP v. Town of New Haven, 259 F.3d 113 (C.A. Conn. 2001).

Seven (7) years I face for your bullshit, and you're gonna pay dearly --- and Legally.

2 Courts: Timmons must face Depo;......... NAACP Pres. appears singularly inarticulate.

Well sports fans, here's the D_L:
(1) Courtroom video was denied in the bogus "Stalking"ex parte Restraining Order case in Nashua District Court brought by Nashua NAACP Pres. Gloria Timmons, but we have the audio CD on order. This is a copy of my objections. We had requested to forward a video to Police Abuse.org, an Internationally-recognized media watchdog. However, the audio presentation, to be posted on this blawg, is damaging enough, we guess:

Timmons is so singularly inarticulate as to be, well, unbelievable, so I quote under my cross-examination because Timmons was upset that I published on my blawg that my lawyers would "roast you and Melanie Levesque up like rotisserie hogs at trial." Here then is the colloquy that ensued:

Q: Do you know what a metaphor is?
A: No.
Q: A simile?
A: No.
Q: Ever heard of Falwell v. Hustler Magazine, 485 U.S. 46 (1988)?
A: No.
Q: Do you know what a parody is?
A: No
Q: Then how can you know what the hell extortion is?
A: No response.

Actually this last question never was posed, but it is the obvious one to ask now, right? She presented no direct evidence of any threat, and no witnesses to back up her assertions that she or her family was under threat. Actually, her own son failed to take the witness stand, tacitly admitting defeat. I know I would certainly testify if my mother's life, much less my own life, was in peril.

In my opinion, she is so ignorant she needs to be removed from office before more people hear about it & listen to her on this website, weblog, podcast and beyond.

(2) Timmons/Levesque's Motion for Continuance on her Halloween Deposition was denied in my Civil Case against them in Hillsborough County Superior Court (South) for Defamation, Malicious Prosecution, First Amendment Conspiracy, etc., and correctly so, as I noted in my Motion to Vacate filed early this a.m. when I had been told erroneously, that the Court had granted the Motion for Continuance. Timmons already has copped six (6) extra weeks since the first properly-noticed Depo. of 19 Sept.

What Gloria really hates is this blawg and her upcoming audio testimony. Her Deposition on Monday will further prove that. She also hates my fliers but that's just too bad, so sad, hard cheese, baby. I gave her an out. Today, I didn't even ask her if she took a page from the diary of Elaine R. Jones, Esq., the deposed NAACP Legal Defense Fund Director who resigned under valid ethics charges just a year ago See my 7 Oct. blawg for a copy of the memogate memo with Senator Kennedy's Office on that one. Teddy (and actually most of the Kennedys) and Elaine have done Great Things in this World; instilled with me a spirit and commitment for social/human services and Civil Rights. But they nor Gloria Timmons may exercise fiefdom in the battle for Human Rights.

Peace.

25 October 2005

What will happen in Court tomorrow.............. See In re: Alexander 147 NH 441 (2002).

First off, a moment of respect for Rosa Parks, at left, vis a vis a moment of sadness and compassion for Gloria Timmons, who has lost her soul. Parks said: "No, I wasn't tired.... the only tired I was, was tired of giving in." Juxtapose that resolve with that of Gloria Timmons, out to protect her little fiefdom at all costs, selling out for The Man like a lil' Condi Rice wannabe, instead of helping out the little people -- except when they are part of her family, like her sister, Cheryl Timmons O'Pesso. See 2 Oct. Entry "My 'scam' in Hartford: Helping Gloria's Sister."

Bill Clinton awarded Ms. Parks a Medal of Freedom, while here in New Hampshire, because of liars like Timmons -- who is a public figure, I might add -- I am being excoriated.

Here is an online video about Ms. Parks over at CNN.

Now back to the case in Nashua District Court for Gloria's bogus Restraining Order/Stalking Petition against me,shall we? Let's see how far Timmons gets when you've got cases like In re: Alexander, 147 NH 441 (2002) holding that:
"Evidence was insufficient to support finding that harassment by former husband constituted a credible threat to former wife's safety, and thus former wife was not entitled to a final domestic violence restraining order against former husband; evidence established that former husband had sent a card to former wife, that he had given her notes, and that he had shown up once at both her home and her place of employment." RSA 173-B:1, subd. 1.
This is simply ludicrous. I've never as much as said 'boo!!!' to her since 9 March, 2005 when she threatened me for attempting to show the proof that she and Boston President Lenny Alkins knew I was suspended, and New England Area Council President Juan Cofield wrote "this asshole really is crazy," still not having explained that statement to me yet. But as I noted on prior occasion, he can tell me precisely what he meant at his Deposition. But before all that, I'll see you in the morning (if you actually show up this time), Gloria.

PS: Timmons might want to bring with her a copy of the Enhanced Advocacy Empowerment Conference training materials regarding Domestic Violence and stalking, like the one I have in my g*ddmamn briefcase.

First Amendment and Timmons on Trial in Nashua Wed: Malicious Prosecution

This is the second time I have been through this nonsense. As seen in this 27 September post: "Timmons a No-Show; I'm free to protest!" The case of Weiss-Lawrence, Inc. v. James Talcott, 399 F. Supp 84 (D.N.H. 1975) was posted regarding malicious prosecution, and I noted the fact that Timmons should be facing malicious prosecution for filing claims against me (and subsequently not even showing up to court) because she knows I'm not stalking her or physically threatening her. It's these mind-bombs on the Internet that are ripping her up if you must know the Truth of it.

So I am asking the court to specifically rule that I am (1) free to contact any third party not in her immediate family, and (2) the people at the NH Department of Employment Security, where Timmons -- who recently sued them for unlawful discrimination for big bucks -- currently works as a public employee to alert them that I believe she has committed unethical acts in a professional capacity that reflect poorly on an employee of the State.

Timmons, the NAACP and Jaffrey PD put out all matter of outright lies about me, on media owned by clients of local NAACP lawyers, so turnaround is certainly Fair Play. If she's got a Defamation complaint against me then let her bring one, but it is certainly not for any Court to start telling me what third parties with whom I may and may not communicate in this instance unless such parties specifically request that I stop communicating with them -- at which point I always do, the handful of times that such requests have been made. I said it before and I'll say it again: That's the Law in 2005, at least yesterday and today.

Still confused as to why I would portray Timmons in such a negative light? Well if the shoe fits, wear it: Read Nashua NAACP Veterans' Chair Cleaven Ferguson's Affidavit supporting me 100% right here -- which she tried to make him change -- which is witness tampering, but Chief Dunn will no doubt ignore that. Too bad Cleaven won't ignore it on the witness stand under direct examination from my lawyers, or on cross from Prosecutor Albrecht.

24 October 2005

Compare this New Mexico Police Abuse case

Same story, but different facts. This guy got popped with a Criminal Defamation Indictment facing one (1) year in prison because his picket sign proclaimed a police officer to be a "liar" and a "dirty cop."

Interesting. My rhetoric was quite professional in the NAACP Demand Letter, never wrote or said anything rude like that, yet and still my black ass faces not one (1) but seven (7) years in the pokey for that. Here's a copy of the Demand Letter at (1) &(2) .

Which case is more heinous? I won't judge that, but I will say that both of these cases will be documented thoroughly on at least my website and weblawg. I have indelibly etched this case into the annals of American Jurisprudence with just a few thousand key strokes and a disciplined work ethic. And I am in contact with the attorneys on the New Mexico Case, which is ironic because just due east to New Mexico, in Arizona, that state declared a statute identical to the New Hampshire Statute under which I am Indicted to be flat out Unconstitutional, as noted in State v. Weinstein, 898 P.2d 513 (1995).

Haters hate that. And they long to crush me because of it. But mark my words, this is the wave of the future, baby.

King moves for dismissal of criminal charges; First Amendment on Trial in New Hampshire

Well sports fans, here is where it all comes down: The hot links for today's Press release that appear in red are as follows: "Why the NAACP is a sellout organization," and "as seen here" and "Melanie: to what 'agenda' do you refer?"

Lastly, it is patently clear that at least one other jurisdiction has ruled that an identical statute to the Extortion Statute under which I labor is Unconstitutional on its face. See State v. Weinstein, 898 P.2d 513 (1995).

Stay tuned.

PS: Cheshire Court just sent notice that this was a scheduling error. Our Final Pretrial is now 28 November, so I get to dance on a string at least a while longer. That's the game of mental torture that Gloria Timmons and the NAACP set out to throw me under because they ran scared of people like Chief Dunn. That's All Right, Gloria. See you Monday at your Deposition. I've got most of my questions mapped out and you and me are gonna have a lot of fun, you know, reminiscing old times and stuff, right?"

Update: Timmons' bogus Restraining Order

Well folks it appears on Wednesday the 26th that I won't get to hear Plaintiff Timmons explain why she (a) previously filed a Temporary Restraining Order on me and failed to even appear in Court, or why (b) she actually believes that she is under some sort of fear that would warrant the Court to trammel my valid First Amendment interests of communicating to whomever I deem appropriate the facts of this case -- unless or until they request to opt out of my email distribution chain. That's the Law, folks and I'm not going to put up with anything less. Attachments 1 and 2.

Unlike Defendant Timmons, however, I will have a legitimate reason for missing the upcoming Court action in Nashua NH District Court: I'll be with my lawyers in Cheshire County moving to dismiss the bogus criminal complaints, all of which stem from Timmons and VP Melanie Levesque's absolute and outright lie that "the NAACP does not sue, or threaten to sue, any party," when in fact they sue for injunctive relief, prospective relief, and monetary recompense all the time!
See NAACP v. Town of East Haven, 259 F.3d 113 (C.A.Conn. 2001).

Gloria: On Halloween Monday, bring your hateful, lying sef' in to your scheduled Deposition in my Civil Case against you for Defamation and Anti-First Amendment Conspiracy. See "Clash of the Titans," 11 Oct.

PS: Cheshire Court just sent notice that this was a scheduling error. Our Final Pretrial is now 28 November so I just told the Nashua District Court to put Timmons "Stalking" Temporary Restraining Order back on the docket for tomorrow. But out in Cheshire County, however, with the criminal charges pending, I get to dance on a string at least a while longer. That's the game of mental torture that Gloria Timmons and the NAACP set out to throw me under because they ran scared of people like Chief Dunn. That's All Right, Gloria. See you Monday at your Deposition. I've got most of my questions mapped out and you and me are gonna' have a lot of fun, you know, reminiscing old times and stuff, right?"

Update: Timmons' bogus Restraining Order

Well folks it appears on Wednesday the 26th that I won't get to hear Plaintiff Timmons explain why she (a) previously filed a Temporary Restraining Order on me and failed to even appear in Court, or why (b) she actually believes that she is under some sort of fear that would warrant the Court to trammel my valid First Amendment interests of communicating to whomever I deem appropriate the facts of this case -- unless or until they request to opt out of my email distribution chain. That's the Law, folks and I'm not going to put up with anything less. Attachment 2 is here.

Unlike Defendant Timmons, however, I will have a legitimate reason for missing the upcoming Court action in Nashua NH District Court: I'll be with my lawyers in Cheshire County moving to dismiss the bogus criminal complaints, all of which stem from Timmons and VP Melanie Levesque's absolute and outright lie that "the NAACP does not sue, or threaten to sue, any party" because they sue for injunctive relief, prospective relief, and monetary recompense all the time!
See NAACP v. Town of East Haven, 259 F.3d 113 (C.A.Conn. 2001).

Gloria: Bring your hateful, lying self in to your scheduled Deposition in my Civil Case against you for Defamation and Anti-First Amendment Conspiracy on Halloween Monday. See "Clash of the Titans," 11 Oct.

22 October 2005

Today's recommended site: Greenburbs

Visit this site and discover more about health, worker safety, preserving our environment and progressive ideals in general. And there is a neat movie from Thursday's 583 Party, too -- you can see me hanging out and passing fliers! I have worked for Ohio Citizen Action on two different campaigns for Right-to-Know laws and more stringent Superfund enforcement, so I'll be enjoying this site, and the people involved in it, with impunity. Provided of course that I still have my freedom. They link to me and I link back to them; keep e'rbody informed of what's up and what's going down. That's how we grow the Revolution, folks.

PS: Watch these clips from "The End of Suburbia" and contemplate the lunacy of fighting wars for oil -- a stopgap measure at best, designed to line the pockets of the elite military-industrial complex. Gil Scott-Heron warned of this.

Today's recommended site: Greenburbs

Visit this site and discover more about health, worker safety, preserving our environment and progressive ideals in general. And there is a really cool movie from Thursday's 583 Party, too. I have worked for Ohio Citizen Action on two different campaigns for Right-to-Know laws and more stringent Superfund enforcement, so I'll be enjoying this site, and the people involved in it, with impunity. Provided of course that I still have my freedom and liberty. They link to me and I link back to them; keep e'rbody informed of what's up and what's going down. That's how we grow the Revolution, folks.

Today's recommended site: Greenburbs

Visit this site and discover more about health, worker safety, preserving our environment and progressive ideals in general. And there is a really cool movie from Thursday's 583 Party, too. I have worked for Ohio Citizen Action on two different campaigns for Right-to-Know laws and more stringent Superfund enforcement, so I'll be enjoying this site, and the people involved in it, with impunity. Provided of course that I still have my freedom and liberty. They link to me and I link back to them; keep e'rbody informed of what's up and what's going down. That's how we grow the Revolution, folks.

Today's recommended site: Greenburbs

Visit this site and discover more about health, worker safety, preserving our environment and progressive ideals in general. And there is a really cool movie from Thursday's 583 Party, too. I have worked for Ohio Citizen Action on two different campaigns for Right-to-Know laws and more stringent Superfund enforcement, so I'll be enjoying this site, and the people involved in it, with impunity. Provided of course that I still have my freedom and liberty. They link to me and I link back to them; keep e'rbody informed of what's up and what's going down. That's how we grow the Revolution, folks.

21 October 2005

Moby; King rock the house!


What a Good Time last night at 583 Art Factory. A lot of smart, progressive people viewing art, mingling, dancing and quaffing beverages provided by Triple 8 Vodka. I met DJ Noelle Robinson (pictured) of Kusic Sound Kource, danced my arse off, bought an autographed/T-Shirt, passed a lot of fliers and gave Moby a DVD entitled "American Lawyer: A First Amendment Fiasco." Many thanks to space owner Lee Milazzo, for throwing the event, with proceeds to benefit Friends of Animals.

PS: Lest you forget, Moby is not all electronica by any means. Some folks always want to pigeonhole people -- including me, as a "coconut head racist." But anyway, that boy can flat play that darned guitar & rock with the best of them, as he did the last time I saw him in Pittsburgh. More 583 Pics here: 1, 2, 3.

19 October 2005

NAACP attacks the First Amendment!


This is the new general-issue flier for tomorrow's Moby event at 583 Art Factory and beyond. Try to lock me for seven (7) years for helping the little guy? As I've stated before and will say it again: Timmons and Levesque struck a Faustian Bargain with Jaffrey Police & Cheshire County Prosecutors, and apparently National NAACP is All Good with that. Unbelievable. Peace.

Steven Biko & me; open letter to Bruce Gordon




A reader just posed the question of parallels between Steven Biko and me.
This is my response:

A good call. I assume you've read my 1985 Apartheid piece that I published on 22 July and a few other times. I think that as with Peter Gabriel's rousing live performance on that issue, more musicians and entertainers need to address the core issues of basic human rights as being raised in this instance by and through a Black Man, but for The Good of All of Society. We are losing basic Human Rights, and alarmingly so right here in America and in New Hampshire, the "Land of the free," and the "Live free or die State," respectively.

I aim not to be a martyr to die in the hands of police custody or at one of the prisons they would love to see me to, as Steven Biko did. I have done nothing wrong, per NAACP v. Town of East Haven, 259 F.3d 113 (C.A. Conn. 2001), and State v. Weinstein 898 P.2d 513 (1995). But I wonder would it take that to heighten America's conscience that the NAACP -- "America's oldest Civil Rights organization" is actually behind such efforts?

Was I chosen to be America's Steven Biko? The mind boggles.... From Biko: "You can blow out a candle / But you can't blow out a fire / Once the flames begin to catch / The wind will blow it higher"

Dear Mr. Gordon: For local NAACP officials to screw up like this is one thing. For the National office to support it is another thing all together.

P.S. I am overnighting a copy of my DVD Spoken Word Tour piece today to the NAACP Legal Defense Fund as part of my complaint against the NAACP.

18 October 2005

New Hampshire last to acknowledge MLK

You, know, I forgot that New Hampshire was the last State in the Union to acknowledge the Martin Luther King Holiday. Perhaps that explains why NAACP Nashua heads Gloria Timmons and Melanie Levesque ran scared and threw me under the bus in Jaffrey: They didn't want to get lynched either so they figured they would just offer me up, instead, in violation of the spirit of this Great Man.

PS: And now a word about Constance Baker Motley (R.I.P.) who would no doubt find Timmons and Levesque's actions deplorable. She says, "when I went to law school no one had heard of Civil Rights." Yeah, I know the feeling.

King's Memo Contra Dismissal


The guts of it are published right here, right now. And my film maker has my Spoken Word DVDs, with evidence document menus, ready for retrieval tonight, just in time for the Moby show this Thursday at 583 Art Factory. I'll make certain he gets one. See 15 October Moby blawg.

16 October 2005

Open complaint to NAACP Legal Defense Fund: NAACP is violating my Civil Rights; will be protested at Voting Rights Act dinner

This is activity so foul in trying to send me to prison for 7 years for Attempted Extortion, that David Horan, one of my defense attorneys & former lead prosecutor for the biggest county (Hillsborough), shook his head and said "I can't begin to see where their case is."

Deposed NAACP Legal Defense Fund Director Elaine R. Jones' PR manager Gwen McKinney told me that the NAACP LDF has no direct corporate, legal or institutional ties to the NAACP. As such, through this blog and via all appropriate channels, I herewith file a Complaint with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund for the activities of the NAACP, which again, in lying to Cheshire County Prosecutor Albrecht, (i.e. "King knew the NAACP doesn't sue") run counter to the clear-cut precedent set in NAACP v. Town of East Haven, 259 F.3d 113 (C.A. Conn. 2001).

Anybody can demand redress from the police on behalf of anyone, or "threaten" to call a press conference. Anybody. That's the First Amendment.

That East Haven case proves conclusively that the NAACP does indeed issue Demand Letters for injunctive, prospective and monetary relief, and does indeed sue. I mean, what planet are we on, here folks? Wake me and tell me this is a bad dream, right? I am surrounded by idiots. And liars.

PS: Motions to Dismiss: The NAACP Motion to dismiss in my Civil case will be met with a request for Sanctions. It is ridiculous and a dilatory move, at best. Our Motions to dismiss the criminal case, OTOH, are credible and quite serious. And even in the event that we lose them, Timmons and Levesque will cook like rotisserie hogs under the heat of my lawyers' cross-examination, and it would be an NAACP public relations nightmare, all caught on film. And Boston area President Lenny Alkins can share in all of it, when he's subpoenaed to discuss what was in the envelopes attached to these receipts, among other things.

King to protest NAACP at gala Voting Rights Act dinner









Well folks I am a Big Fan of the Voting Rights Act, passed in my birth year, as a matter of fact (1965). I want it renewed and strengthened. But that will not be the focus of my First Amendment protest against the NAACP down at the Avenue of the Americas on Thursday, 3 Nov. 2005. They are trying to imprison me for legally helping a victim of police abuse by 1) writing a Demand Letter after victim interview and analysis of police reports, as in NAACP v. Town of East Haven, 259 F.3d 113 (C.A.Conn. 2001 and 2) "threatening" to call a press conference, which ruffled the feathers of New Hampshire's largely white police establishment. It is unbelievable. See "Timmons = Bad for Black Women" 14 Oct. That's Nashua NAACP President Timmons in the pictures. Spot the difference? Yeah, me neither.

I'll have my film maker and backup crew at the ready. In fact, you can see some of his work over at the website, on the First Amendment Trailer and my Arraignment/Press Conference video.

Peace, and Civil Rights to all.

15 October 2005

Is Cleaven Ferguson a liar??

NAACP bylaws provide for impeachment of officers who lie in the prosecution of their duties. Nashua NAACP Chapter President Gloria Timmmons, to my knowledge, has not commenced any such action toward Nashua NAACP Veterans' Cleaven Ferguson, although she DID try to make him say something different, he never gave her an affidavit, as he did here with me, and that's arguably witness tampering. So, Gloria, what's it gonna be about? You gonna' try to get him removed for lying, or what? Heck no you're not, because you know he didn't, and he isn't.

Yeah, also this 9 March 2005 email from me to Timmons regarding Willie Toney appeared a while ago but I forgot about it for a minute. Check it out.

The Yamaha R1, my bike & the moon



You know, this is one bad machine much as I like less radical bikes in general. It is a space ship. So small, so lithe, nothing says "wasp-waisted" more than this bike. The 39hp (felt like much more) '75 RD350 I had in undergrad was the "racer" in its day, as was my current 105hp '86 FZ750 back in its day, but nothing like today. To pack a 180 crank hp 1000cc inline-4 into such a tight frame, especially in the maroon colour I saw this evening, is a thing of beauty. "You can see the soul of the R1 in your bike," said the R1 rider. True dat. Then I rode into the night, toward the moon, whereupon I met some cool media people. More on that later.
PS: I miss kick-starting a motorcycle.
2011 Update: The Triumph Sprint 955i, some orchids and a full moon :)