30 June 2005

Christopher King is a "Dangerous Black Man"

Here's why:

1. 2005: Issue "threat" in writing, with full acceptance of Boston NAACP and Greater Nashua NAACP that I will call a press conference regarding handcuffs, three (3) drawn guns, and an unwarranted body cavity search in Jaffrey, New Hampshire of a man black, white, blue, green, who cares what colour. Result: I am brought up under Attempted Felony Extortion with lies manufactured I believe by way of conspiracy leading to my lawsuit against Jaffrey and NAACP as noted in the Nashua Telegraph. First Vice President Melanie Levesque lies about everything as noted hereinbelow. See: I must be an Extortionist Black Man. That's what Marty said.

2. Do The Math. I told Stephen Seitz at the Union Leader today that calling a Press Conference is not a threat to national security so that there is no legitimate reason for any citizen, suspended lawyer or not, to fear an Indictment for calling a Press Conference on issues of public concern. We got into it for a bit, and I told him he knew in his heart that I was right. I told the same thing to the Peterborough Transcript, but despite issuing a nasty online news story about me last week, straight from the mouths of NAACP and Chief Dunn, there is no online version this week with anything I had to say. Strange, right? Not really. Je pense qu' il y a un autre jour en Babylon.

Calling a Press Conference is not a crime.

Calling a press conference on an issue of public concern is not a punishable offense. The arrest and body-cavity search of any suspect of any race, age, colour, etc. who is not armed or with outstanding warrants is a matter of public concern. If you call a press conference and actually Defame someone, that's different. Therefore, the government's attempt to punish someone (anyone) for it is an unlawful form of Prior Restraint, chilling the free exercise of speech everywhere.

Pray for me; pray for this Country. BTW it was a gift from the French.

Calling Press Conference is not a crime.

Calling a press conference on an issue of public concern is not a punishable offense. The arrest and body-cavity search of any suspect of any race, age, colour, etc. who is not armed or with outstanding warrants is a matter of public concern. If you call a press conference and actually Defame someone, that's different. Therefore, the government's attempt to punish someone (anyone) for it is an unlawful form of Prior Restraint, chilling the free exercise of speech everywhere.

Pray for me; pray for this Country. BTW it was a gift from the French.

MLK Day, 1997: Commended as guest speaker for being a vigorous attorney and role model. (Columbus, Ohio Public Schools). Chief Dunn: This is not a "fantasy" or figment of my imagination. Posted by Hello

It's nothing I hadn't done before, as in this 1992 picture of me in Geauga County, Ohio High School rappin' with all those white kids about the value of education.

29 June 2005

A typical support message

Keep up the honest defense, Chris

--Posted by Anonymous to Christopher King's First Amendment Page at 6/29/2005 06:26:02 PM

I told NH Union Leader writer Stephen Seitz today that irrespective of what some say about me, I am not a "Dangerous Black Man," nor am I an Extortionist, but rather just a man armed only with The Truth. I am a true Freedom Rider, circa 2005, when the NAACP seems to have forgotten about any individual Civil Rights actions. I wish the new President Bruce Gordon much luck with the organization to which I so freely gave of my time, organizing an internship program, building an extensive database for revenue generation, editing campaign letters, and fielding dozens of calls relating to Civil Rights matters in schools, jails, and in the streets of Jaffrey.

Nashua Telegraph still Fair and Balanced; covered my lawsuit against Timmons, Levesque, Dunn

Ever since they emailed me the Telegraph has been reasonable. They were quite reasonable in today's paper, as well, even though WMUR'Channel 9 showed up to an arraignment press conference that I called, yet failed to mention at the 12:00/noon news that I called the conference, or even that I had filed suit against Gloria Timmons, Melanie Levesque and Jaffrey Police Chief Dunn.

Fortunately my film maker was there to capture the whole event, which will soon be a companion video to the one that is already on my website, along with the lawsuit, which will soon have the attachments available for view so that the entire World can be the Judge. So one detractor in my past says I'm a Dangerous Black Man, and Jaffrey Police say I'm an Extortionist. Why can't I just be a concerned citizen?

WMUR ran a 5:00 piece that failed to mention the First Amendment issue at all: I said "the point of fact is that the NAACP or a private citizen may command a press release about any issue of public concern, but an Indictment for so doing is a form of unlawful Prior Restraint because it chills the expression of Free Speech for all....." But all they ran was the last half of my quote which was that "any juror who would vote to convict on the facts of this case is asking for the government to come to their door to remove a bundle of their liberties," but since it was delievered without the first 8 seconds it rings shallow. What else is new. That's why up to this point I have to sing the praises of the Telegraph for at least reporting the gosh-darned facts, something the Boston Globe never has done with respect to American Tower.

BTW: "The NAACP does not sue, or threaten to sue anyone?" (Levesque). Yeah, right. These suits involve money damages of $50 Million for crissakes . Isn't it clear in this case that they have totally lied about me? The question is, who put them up to it and why? Well whatever it takes to put a Dangerous Black Man in his place, I guess.

BTW: Own recognizance, $5,000.00 bond. And yes, I am very well represented by both of my attorneys, who kinda shy away from big time media stuff but you can look them up if you like.

Peace.

Nashua Telegraph still Fair and Balanced; covered my suit against NAACP/Dunn

Ever since they emailed me the Telegraph has been reasonable. They were quite reasonable in today's paper, as well, even though WMUR'Channel 9 showed up to an arraignment press conference that I called, yet failed to mention at the 12:00/noon news that I called the conference, or even that I had filed suit against Gloria Timmons, Melanie Levesque and Jaffrey Police Chieff Dunn. Fortunately my film maker was there to capture the whole event, which will soon be a companion video to the one that is already on my website, along with the lawsuit, which will soon have the attachments available for view so that the entire World can be the Judge. So American Tower says I'm a Dangerous Black Man, and Jaffrey Police say I'm an Extortionist. Why can't I just be a concerned citizen?

BTW: Own recognizance, $5,000.00 bond. And yes, I am very well represented by both of my attorneys, who kinda shy away from big time media stuff but you can look them up if you like.

Peace.

28 June 2005

My "Ultimatim" to Chief Dunn

From my 25 December 2004 email to Chief Dunn:

Thank you in advance for your time, and please accept our continued wishes for a safe Holiday and New Year. Police have what is unquestionably the toughest job in the World, yet in this instance it appears that they have some responsibility for wrongful actions against Mr. Toney.

We look forward to working with you.

Open Letter to the Union Leader and media

In this case, things will happen in a most public manner so that those who take the time to read will see the truth. That is precisely what the First Amendment is all about -- you shouldn't be indicted four (4) days after you put up a weblog critical of the your government and/or the NAACP. This is no different than what they did to Lenny Bruce back in the day. Instead let's be concerned about truly dangerous people who are walking around in Boston.

Dear Editors:

I have heard from one of my attorneys that there was a critical editorial written about me in the Union Leader "Shaking Down -- Learn from the Master." Your paper initially failed to even call or email me, despite having access to my website, blog, and email address. As a former reporter at a large daily newspaper I find that omission startling, to say the least. Two of my cousins are World-renowned journalists who you have seen on (inter)national television repeatedly, and I'm certain that they would find that omission startling as well. Your editorial has all but convicted me, e.g. 'don't try this at home kids you might find a prison cell.'

I will be vindicated of all charges, and urge you to do some reading behind the scene at my blogspot and website to find out what kind of person I really am, and some of the gains that I have made for the little people and workers throughout my career, including victims of unauthorized police authority. See this and this, for example.

I have founded two (2) different non-profit groups to help at-risk youth and have earned accolades in several cities for so doing. My good name is being stained in this instance. In closing, I can only say to you that if ever you have to be handcuffed, face three (3) drawn firearms and be subject to a body cavity search and a "shake down" of your anus, without probable cause, I hope you have the good fortune to find someone like me to help you.

As my resume and weblog indicate, I am quite the professional. In fact, professors are teaching classes about about a case in which I wrote a successful Ohio Supreme Court Brief on in Ohio, State v. Lessin 67 Ohio State 3d. 487 (1993). My former employer is going to be active in my defense of these spurious charges.

I have attached an email chain clearly showing that the NAACP lied about everything material in this case. I've got much more to show at a time appropriate.

Very truly yours,

Christopher King, Esq.

cc: world wide web; blind copies; my film makers

27 June 2005

Proof of Defamation Damages

As noted below, Extortion allegations involve crimes of moral turpitude and if proved that these comments were issued recklessly no special damages are needed. But here is what one well-respected individual in the Greater Nashua community who shall most definitely remain nameless at this juncture, said about my palpably-damaged reputation:

Chris,

Although I sympathize with your situation, I am in no position to judge you or anyone involved in this matter. It is clear that you have attorneys involved in this so I don't think [this board] is the proper venue for you to pursue this in. Speaking for myself, I hope you can clear this up quickly and restore your good name.

Sincerely,


Name withheld to protect him/her from haters.

MLK Day, 1997: Commended as guest speaker for being a vigorous attorney and role model. (Columbus, Ohio Public Schools). Chief Dunn: This is not a "fantasy" or figment of my imagination. Posted by Hello

26 June 2005

NAACP/Levesque lied about litigation policy

“We really do not condone what he’s doing,” said First Vice President Melanie Levesque in a message left on a reporter’s answering machine. “We were never at any time aware that he was going to extort money from the Jaffrey police." (New Hampshire Union Leader, 25 June 2005)

"The NAACP does not litigate, or threaten to sue any party, Levesque said." (Nashua Telegraph, 22 June 2005)

NAACP Leadership Mandatory Certification Training, 2005-2006 (provided to me several months after I assumed the Chair position and several weeks after the Willie Toney matter) reads, at page 58, that litigation authority can be given by the President and CEO and General Counsel for a Unit of the Organization seeking to "initiate, endorse or participate in legal action." Litigation, then, which presumably would start with a DEMAND LETTER, similar to the one that I wrote, seeking to resolve the matter without going into Court or protracted litigation, is indeed possible. A Demand Letter is not tantamount to extortion, nor is the threat of a press release. So who's really telling the truth here, and who was really "duped," in the words of Ms. Levesque? The American Public has been duped and my name has been smeared in front of millions of people, all because NAACP did not provide me with adequate protocol. In due time my attorneys and I will expose more lies that have been issued about me relative to this Felony Indictment for Attempted Extortion. Legal scholars: Extortion is a crime of moral turpitude the last time I checked, so damages are presumed in a Defamation Action. Stay tuned.

Hawken 20th: With Jr. High Tennis coach Lavelle Esgar; see also "40-Up: Where are they now?"  Posted by Hello


King & Friends@Hawken 20th: Bryan, King, Randorf, Healy, Young, Evans.  Posted by Hello

24 June 2005

Who is this foo' ?

Ohio Board of Grievances, 1999: "King is a philosophical orator."
(disparagingly stated)

Anonymous Detractor, 2002: "King is a
Dangerous Black Man."
(disparagingly stated)

King, 2005: " I am a
Dangerous, Black Philosophical Orator."
(proudly stated, too proudly for some)

Whatever, guys. Peace.

Dangerous Negroes: Camdyn/4, Felon/40, Cecil/67, Chandler/7; Mom not there and leave my sisters out of this 'cos they don't need no haters.....try to love one another..... Posted by Hello

Dangerous Negroes: Camdyn/4, Felon/40, Cecil/67, Chandler/7 Posted by Hello

23 June 2005

Uncle Chris what's a felon?

Chandler, 7: Uncle Chris, what's a felon?
Me, 40: Someone who speaks freely in the United States after 9/11.
Chan: Well why do they call you a Dangerous Black Man?
Me: Because I'm a felon.

Now that's professional II

And we have this from Chief Dunn to a whole bunch of folks who used to be my friends until Chief Dunn started his little witch hunt:
"Martin Dunn" Add to Address Book
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:33:28 -0500

Mr. King:
You obviously are a disturbed individual. Your fantasies about your past accomplishments and transgressions are remarkable. It is unfortunate the NAACP and the Jaffrey Police Department crossed your path on your way to wherever. I wonder what we will learn when we complete our investigation into your activities in the five states you moved into and out of during the past five years.


......ummm, pardon-moi, but precisely which trials that I won or which settlements that I write about or which newspapers or Attorney General's office that I worked for or which successful First Amendment Ohio Supreme Court briefs that I primarily authored for lead counsel Terry Gilbert with ACLU & Kevin O'Neill on amicus (State v. Lessin Ohio, 67 Ohio St. 3d 487 1993 but no I am not personally a Communist I swear) are figments of my imagination?..........

As one can see, people are teaching classes off of cases I wrote. That's the best I can do, right?

Now that's professional I

Here's an interesting email I saved from one of my NAACP superiors, New England Area Conference President Juan Cofield. It's very professional, n'est-ce pas?

From: Jmcofield@aol.com Add to Address Book
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:23:29 EST
Subject: Re: Dereliction of Duty on complaint against Richard C. Van Nostrand
To: chrystobal39@yahoo.com, president.naacpbostonbranch@verizon.net, roscoe.morris@worldnet.att.net

This asshole really is crazy. Juan


.....would he be referring to me?......The mind boggles with the onset of such rampant displays of articularity.

Jaffrey uses self-attaching handcuffs!

Chief Dunn: "There was no touching, no racial comments." So I suppose those handcuffs just lept onto Mr. Toney's wrists, huh? And surely Mr. Toney was touched by the aim of three (3) drawn Police-spec firearms, right? Spare me the nonsense I've got a full stomach.

Lies and the lying liars who tell them

Based on information and belief, Nashua NAACP First Vice President Melanie Levesque verbally indicated to Nashua Telegraph Reporter Al McKeon that there was no Boston Chapter, causing him to get it wrong in the story noted below, which thankfully now contains a link to this blog. The correction, if there is one yet, does not readily appear in the online edition. [correction made]. Her misrepresentation in that instance, and her outright lies about what Boston President Leonard Alkins and Greater Nashua Executive Committee knew about my suspension and negotiations with Chief Dunn have made me look bad. Very bad. Sit tight, Ms. Levesque: You, President Timmons and Chief Dunn will receive something special from me in short order.

I've got a stack of papers to choke a dinosaur to prove my point; heck before my appointment to the Legal Redress Chair I even sent hard and soft copies of proof of my suspension myself, to National NAACP and to NAACP Legal Defense Fund. So the question is, may someone who tells the truth -- and the truth clearly negating mens rea -- actually be incarcerated, or should the U.S. Attorneys/Justice Department step in? Oh, wait -- they told me to talk to the local prosecutor. But that would be the one who hung up on my attorneys yesterday...... Face it, folks: You open your mouth in this country and you are not safe from your employers or your government. Especially if you're a strong-willed Dangerous Black Man. But shouldn't we be concerned about truly dangerous people -- in Boston, Massachusetts no less -- instead? So this guy's walking around freely in Boston, while I'm getting the police and an indictment called on me for "threatening" to hold a press conference about police brutality. Hmmmmm......

22 June 2005

Police on my back catch me if I dare drop back

Well sports fans my attorneys (one from MA and one from NH) telephoned Cheshire County Prosecutor William Albrecht, IV this afternoon. He declined to speak to them until they filed a formal Notice of Appearance, and hung up.

Meanwhile, the blogger community begins to weigh in:

........Based on my experience with these types of cases, I can pretty confidently say that the extortion case is bullshit. Sending a demand letter on behalf of an organization is not extortive conduct. Moreover, if Mr. King can establish that he acted in good faith when sending the demand letter, he will walk.

If the NAACP officials knew that he wasn't licensed to practice law, but now are saying they didn't know, then those officials can be sued for libel, and perhaps civil rights violations. In some jurisdictions, a party giving false testimony (which serves as the hook for initation of the criminal process) becomes a state actor and thus is amenable to suit[King notes: Oh, yeah, suing all of them under Defamation and Due/Procedural process/First Amendment trammeling (3 days after blog I catch a case, yeah, right) and 42 U.S.C. 1985, then Chief Dunn on 1983].

If what Mr. King says is true, then a lot of people are going to pay out a lot of money. Perhaps those NAACP officials have too long considered themselves as being cloaked with the, "If you sue me I'll play the race card" immunity. If Mr. King sues them, then that immunity will be stripped.

BUT, Mr. King is at a crossroads. A good criminal defense lawyer would focus on the narrow legal issues involved. By establish[ing] that Mr. King, if anything, merely made a good faith mistake when he sent the demand letter, he will likely be acquitted. But I suspect Mr. King wants to put racism on trial.[King notes: it's "colour" but not just skin colour....its the colour of money and the colours of ideology, youthful exuberance and a departure from the norm. I told Jaffrey and NAACP that the man's rights were violated irrespective of race -- but of course the newspapers, etc. never mention that so they can label me as a one-trick pony].

The more I've read, the more I've concluded that Mr. King was victimized for a) his race; but mostly b) not playing ball. Had he rolled over for the State Bar, he would not have been disbarred. [King notes: suspended, not disbarred].

Anyhow, Chris, good luck. Hire the best criminal defense lawyer you can afford, [King notes: See former boss and current friend Terry H. Gilbert, supra] and listen to him or her. If not, the latest injustice you suffer might involve a prison cell.
Stay safe.[King notes: Thank you brother/sister, and pax be unto you as well].

Nashua Telegraph Reasonably Fair and Balanced

At least the Telegraph, as opposed to WMUR Channel 9, noted that I claimed that I had notified the NAACP of everything I did, including my suspension. I am pleased to know that Channel 9 will be following up with me as soon as I return to Nashua. I wanted them to do a phone interview I am so upset, but this way I can actually show the documents on TV. Here is the Telegraph piece:
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050622/NEWS01/106220028/-1/news
This information was available through this page, which was linked to my website by early afternoon, 21 June. Channel 9 did attempt to interview me, and did use footage from my website but did not mention anything from the blog. The main thing the Telegraph did not have space to mention was that The Columbus Bar Association's own documents stated that there was no prohibition in Ohio for lawyers to surreptitiously tape record conversations, and it is a fact that I had investigated and found that neighbors verified claims of racial slurs against my clients (a mixed-race couple) by the landlord. As such, we were acting as testers in a racially-concerned housing matter, pursuant to cases like Heights Community Congress v. Hilltop Realty, 629 F Supp 1232, N.D. Ohio, 1983. When the landlord did not specifically use a racial slur at that time (they're getting smarter these days) but did make another disparaging remark, a slander claim was added to the personal injury claim. The city, by the way, had issued an emergency order on the property. The Ohio Supreme Court never even addressed the tester issue, which is part of the reason that Monitor Louis A. Jacobs said that "race, ignorance and reactionary politics" played a role in my suspension.


And the story claims that there is no NAACP Boston Chapter, but the person who referred me to the Nashua Chapter is none other than Leonard Alkins, and I still have the emails.

And the article initially failed to mention my website or this page, so that people can discover the real story behind the story. How or why could I have been hiding my suspension from anyone while I was preparing a book movie and website about the whole thing? That's simply ridiculous.

21 June 2005

THE NAACP LIED TO CHANNEL 9

Well well well. My roomies played the Channel 9 tape this evening. Funny how Mel Levesque I believe I heard say that I never told NAACP about my suspension from practice, but I have the emails directly to the contrary.

Funny how Chief Dunn said I issued an "ultimatim" when all I wrote was:

"......Despite so doing, and despite the fact that the officers knew he was with [his caucasian friend], they then subsequently strip-searched him.[actually it was a body cavity search when the man had no warrants, no drugs and no weapons other than the smallest Swiss Army Knife that every NH male has in his pocket]. As such, Mr. Toney has authorized us to issue a Demand of $65,000.00 to promptly resolve this matter without protracted litigation. We would like to see this resolved in the most amicable and reasonable manner possible. Please contact us on or before the close of business, 31 December, 2004 to commence discussions on this matter."

Subsequently I offered to present this case with Chief Dunn, at his classroom, without any statements being admissible in a court of law if we were to find a referral attorney for Mr. Toney. Referral attorney means that I cannot practice, right? Simple.

Also, as I make the point below, in "NAACP is a sellout organization" I never said I was "the Johnny Cochran of Columbus. " That comment came from Minister Donell Mohammad after I won a 4-day trespassing case for penny press operator Jerry L. Doyle.

Lastly, I never tried to take money from anyone in Connecticut and the only reason I was helping out down there was because Nashua NAACP President Gloria Timmons wanted me to help her sister down there! I did what I was told to do! I've got proof of that, too. They, not I, should be ashamed of themselves.

The truth will come out if it is the last thing I do.

INDICTED FOR FELONY EXTORTION!!!

It seems that immediately (4 days?) after I published my blog (see "NAACP is a sellout organization" below), after "researching" their alleged case for Extortion against me for what, 5 months, Jaffrey Police Chief Dunn hastily calls a press conference today and indicts my black ass...... On Juneteenth and 41 years to the day that Schwerner, Chaney and Goodman met their waterloo in a roadside ditch.

Quel irony, n'est-ce pas? Je pense en France qu'il y a un jambon sandwich, non?


I mean, it's almost funny. They are proving everything I say in this blog. Heck, why not just eliminate the middle man and send out a grand wizard in a white sheet and faux pontiff hat with a few of his buddies so they can string me up, whip me, lynch me and castrate me? I mean, if that's what you really want, Chief Dunn, be a man about it and just get to it. Oh, wait: Nah, they'll getcha' for that now-a-days: http://news.yahoo.com/fc/us/mississippi_civil_rights_murders

Yeah I must be dangerous, because everywhere I go here come the police......


I have selected an arraignment counsel and subsequently will select a First Amendment Counsel.

Stay tuned.

Uncle Chris can we go to the 'Y'?

9:54 a:

Chandler, 7yrs: "Uncle Chris can we go to the 'Y' to swim?
Me: "Yes Chan, maybe not until this afternoon"
Chandler: "How many minutes is it until afternoon.....?"

oozing danger from every pore. Posted by Hello

Why "American Lawyer" will be a success

This multi-media project "American Lawyer, Christopher King is a Dangerous Black Man" will indeed be spiritually and financially successful simply because my story is every(wo)man's story, but with a twist: Not too many people who get unjustly accused of extortion happen to have histories as Assistant Attorney Generals working in the Employment Services Section, nor were they private Civil Rights attorneys with a background in working for peace, as I have led anti-apartheid marches in Cincinnati, and got to meet and interview Arthur Ashe, for example. Yes, they straight-up arrested his narrow black ass at least twice, too, and yes he was my idol. Well him and John McEnroe. They both rock. Met him, too. Never met Bjorn or Jimmy but my film maker played a match in front of Jimmy and John once in St. Louis as a juniour. Arthur I think understood John, for certain. Anyway, then when we can project how I grew up and who my friends are, nobody can play the reverse race card, i.e. "oh, he just hates white folks and the police."

Nope. Nothing could be further from the truth. I just thank the High Spirits that my independent film crew and legal support will never sell me down the river. And we're going to encourage more people to stand up to abusive situations; demand respect 24/7. That is precisely why some people have called me a Dangerous Black Man

Here is one recent email to me from a support group at oddtodd.com:

Hi, Chris--I watched your video.

It embodies what happens to millions of us on a daily basis, cementing, in my mind anyway, what the real world has become. When corporations run roughshod over the very people that make them operate, when the power of the few is so corrupt and wielded so mercilessly, there seems to be no hope until someone like you comes along to stand up to these people.

And no one knows better than you do the sacrifices you must make.

I'm white but know of the little indignities endured by my black friends even in this, the 21st century. I can only imagine what it was like to be labeled a "dangerous black man." Thanks for sharing the video and your linkage. Oddtodd cracks me up too. His cartoons are nothing short of wonderful, aren't they?

Sincerely,
(name withheld pending further harassment from The Man)

18 June 2005


"Babylon Energy" says I'm a Dangerous Black Man Posted by Hello

Why the NAACP is a sellout organization

I used to be their Legal Redress chair for Greater Nashua, New Hampshire. A black man was assaulted guns drawn by 3 white officers and body cavity searched with all 3 officers present in Jaffrey, New Hampshire. His only crime: allegedly running behind a building, but the sworn statements indicate he followed all orders to get on the ground and have his black ass handcuffed and arrested immediately. He said he was just going back there to take a leak. His white friend came out and told them who he was, and that they were waiting in his girlfriend to come out from the store in that very building where she worked and that yes, he was indeed just back there to take a leak while waiting for him and his girly. Cops made a big issue out of the fact that they gave differing names, only because the black guy gave them an alias name for them to search his records (but only because they had asked him whether he had ever been arrested for some reason, a questionable activity in the first place).

There was no warrant out on him, and no particularized suspicion of drug use or weapons, and he had only on his possession the smallest Swiss army knife made. No reason for a bend-over-naked-and-cough strip search, in other words. Ask any lawyer.

Well I issued a Demand letter on behalf of the NAACP for $65K I think based on a prior case I had in '98 with similar facts.

http://www.cincypost.com/news/1998/settle071598.html

I notified the Boston and Greater Nashua chapters of each and every step along the way. I have email proof of that. I asked for negotiations and asked Chief Dunn to join him at one of his college classroom discussions with any comments not usable at trial if we were to find a lawyer for the black guy.

Chief Dunn threatens the NAACP and they lie, tell him I never told them I had been suspended from practice in Ohio. He accuses the NAACP of extortion so they throw me under the bus. He then wrote to a whole bunch of people in an email chain that I am "obviously a disturbed individual" with "fantasies" about my past accomplishments. I prepare a draft Defamation lawsuit against him and the NAACP because I have it in writing, in emails that Boston and Greater Nashua knew, ab initio, about my 1 year ordered suspension from Ohio from being too vigorous a Civil Rights lawyer and I had never once represented myself as a licensed attorney. I had told each of them separately of the suspension and Boston had told Nashua in recommending me for the Chair position, in fact. They all knew that board disciplinary panel member Louis A. Jacobs had written that "racism, ignorance and reactionary politics" played a role in my suspension. Yes I've got email proof of that, too.

Greater Nashua takes me off the Chair and actually brings in Chief Dunn for a chalk talk. The intern was there (from the internship program that I set up, incidentally) and she took notes for me at times I wasn't in the room and he used words like "sham" etc. etc. Unbelievable. If the official position of the NAACP was that I didn't have authority to issue a Demand they should have told me something but they never did, despite me sharing the Demand letter with everyone.

And why would I have hidden my suspension when I was busy preparing my short film, book and website?

Read the last link on this page where I flat out talk about all of it.

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/

Yeah most of those folks are nothing but gatekeepers and punks IMNSH(but accurate)O. But if you go to the website and see my film where after Jerry Doyle's acquittal that guy says "That's what you get when you mess with the Johnny Cochran of Columbus" -- well he would be none other than Minister Donell Mohammad of the Columbus Mosque No. 43 I believe it is -- used to hold my press conferences even though I am most definitely not in the Nation of Islam. Columbus NAACP were a bunch of sellouts but the Nation just liked my resolve to help people, predominately financially strapped blacks but plenty of financially-strapped whites, latinos, etc. (and several wealthy folks on the side at times I might add) that had little or no access to the legal system, or who were suing a high roller in the establishment. Legal access is a serious, serious problem in America.

NAACP also sold my father down the river after they referred him to in my opinion a sorry-assed lawyer in Cleveland (who is about to be sued for malpractice) who conducted absolutely no discovery, just took my Dad's monay and did absolutely nothing in his case except defend one Deposition before dismissing it subject to the one year savings clause. My Dad worked for this company 36 or 37 years, mind you, and his white former boss is his best friend and a man who I thought was really my uncle until I was like 12. He is going to testify against that company on my father's behalf for certain. They tricked my Dad into signing a damn release for monay but we have proof that work in his area continued on well after he resigned. In fact, the company is growing and my father is an extremely vital mid-60's man who got his greatest pension years yanked out from under him, after years of racial discrimination to which my Caucasian "Uncle" will attest. These are stories from America's heartland, folks.

People think Civil Rights Plaintiffs just waltz into court and walk out with big money or lose after bringing frivolous cases but that's only because those are the cases that the media wants you to know about. It's all a ruse, and I've also got about 40 courtroom tapes from practicing in Ohio courts, City Council and School Boards in the 90's to edit down for my feature-length presentation to show you how and why. Most lawyers won't tell you these things because they are afraid, but repeat after me: Eternal vigilence is the price of Freedom....... Eternal vigilence is the price......

American Tower says I'm a Dangerous Black Man


American Tower says I'm a DBM Posted by Hello

18 June 2005 -- Why a First Amendment Blog?

Great Morning!

It is a beautiful Saturday morning with my father here in sunny Southern CT at my sister's and time for my first submission. At the outset I note that my father has neglected to bring his tennis rackets up from Cleveland, pointing to his hip or whatever. Yeah, right, Pal.

This blog is first and foremost about the First Amendment; second about judicial, corporate and political corruption and abuse. As such, it is a companion site to my website listed above. As I allude to in my online video, may none of us ever forget that we are all gathered here in this blogosphere because of the First Amendment or like principles throughout the World, which we cling to even in this post-9/11 era. Today the U.S. Government and other corporations want you to remain silent and stupid. Well I'm not having any of that.

That having been said, today's topic is naturally the current House Vote to repeal the "Sneak and Peek" provisions of The Act. I tend to be a First Amendment absolutist, but yet I am certain that terrorists (including people like Timothy McViegh, etc.) have used libraries and bookstores in their efforts. Nonetheless, there's something just not right about this -- regardless of whether the provision actually has been used inappropriately......yet. There's a slippery slope going on here. Besides, shouldn't we be a bit more careful just minding our own borders from truly dangerous would-be immigrants?

I mean, like, wowzers..... just look at this guy willya? Ouch. Yeah, that's right: Clearly people like me -- and you -- are the dangerous ones.

PS from 11 Dec 2005: I was right about that damn Patriot Act proviso.