24 April 2015

KingCast and Mortgage Movies See More Foreclosure Abuse During Mandatory BK Stay Involving Dirty-Assed Law Firm Reimer, Arnoviz, Chernek & Jeffrey.

In Pattie Busby's case the State Court Judge O'Connell screwed her royally and the State Court Judge even issued rulings after hours during a Mandatory BK Stay. Now the Federal Court Magistrate and Court are ignoring her arguments relative to Rooker-Feldman even though she cited to Sixth Circuit cases in which Rooker-Feldman did not eliminate the possibility of a Federal lawsuit if the State process was a perversion of Justice, particularly if the banks used false, fraudulent or forged Affidavits, which is par for the Course for Reimer, going all the way back to 1997 as noted in my seminal journal entry on these legal maggots. See also my anti-Reimer FB Page and Cindy Seymour Schmittauer's Ohio Homeowners Unite FB Page.

Busby says that the Magistrate in her case, one Michael Merz (gotta love the homophone right), failed to even address his own case on such an issue when he issued both his initial Report and Recommendations as well as his Supplemental R&R. I'll be reading her filing for the case citation today. Found it. Baker v. People's Choice Home Loan, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96454 (SD WD Ohio 2010) -- Read below.  Speaking of R&R there will be none of that for Bank of America's high-paid attorneys because Ms. Busby sees a split in the Circuit Courts on that matter so she's headed to SCOTUS. I love it.
Now today I get a message from another Ohio homeowner who lives not far from Ms. Busby regarding a Sheriff sale that happened yesterday during a Mandatory BK Stay as noted by way of the attached thumbnails showing the sale and the BK filings.
"[Chris], I just got off phone with (my Attorney) Nick ZIngatelli's office. He was in hearing but Tammy gave me BK no 15-11576. You said you didn't need it but just thought I'd share that with you. She confirmed that a fax was sent to Sheriff Office on WED when I filed. She also said they knew my house was illegally sold yesterday (THURSDAY) and they're already on it. She said she notified bank this morning that sale is void. I asked her if I (we) should file something with Sheriff Office alerting them also and she said she didn't know anything about that . And that's when she told me she had faxed alert To sheriff on Wed.  She said she'd talk to Nick after his hearing and let me know."
Can you believe this shit? The brazen indifference to anything legal whenever Reimer Arnovitz enters the room, right. Well Ohio is one dirty-assed State, and I'm glad that folks back in Cleveland are helping my father with his book about his life as a black man dealing with life in a red state in the socio-economic, political and legal realms. I was with him on research for many of his issues and look forward to publication because little people need to have our voices heard too!

KingCast Alternately Cries and Laughs Out Loud as Revere Public Schools Union Treasurer Karyn Maglione is Reportedly Investigated for Theft in Office.



You remember Clifford Pisano's ongoing saga about how Revere screwed him out of his job as a crossing guard after he worked in concerted activity to form a Union?  Read the Revere "Black Niggers" journal entry with Terri Pecher James and Sonia Fernandez vs. Tommy Ambrosino 03-CV-12499 for a quick refresher.  When Mr. Pisano and I went down to Court so I could run video of him filing his claims a few years ago some stooge tried to stop me from running video so I had to put him in his place, LOL Sideshow Bob. See video, below.

Here's the funny part. If Ms. Maglione is yet indeed another dirty Revere official doing yet another dirty deed, when she enters the Court system Tommy Ambrosino will be checking things out as Executive Director of the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC). Query, did he have a hand in her appointment?  How he got that position at SJC I would hate to hazard a guess because it sure as hell wasn't based on integrity, as noted in the top video when Mr. Pisano first filed suit against him. Mr. Pisano now has a lawyer and they are in Federal Court, case no. forthcoming.


Ms. Maglione is by Statute and Contract a bonded employee. Someone should find out who the bonding company is. I don't have time right now but I'm sure someone will step to it. The Cause of Justice requires as much.  

20 April 2015

KingCast is Schooled on Sony ASV100 Action Cam Underwater Housing Capabilities.


I met a fella from Spain who told me to get rid of the blur I have to buy the O-Ring model. Unfortunately it carries its own set of problems. Now I am kind of wishing I had bought the GoPro but the Sony records in stereo much better than GoPro for courtroom and other video crap. Uggghhh... never simple is it.


Video from Kapoho Tide Pools forthcoming. What an amazing place for easy yet visually stimulating snorkeling!

What the hell is this fish with the designer touch? It has an orange knob toward the back and really pretty purple markings.
PS: I found it. Achilles Surgeonfish.

17 April 2015

KingCast and Mortgage Movies Present: Trouble in Paradise -- Maui Foreclosures Allowed by Judge Peter T. Cahill Without Proof of Standing or HRS §667-17 Compliance.




24 April 2014 -- First video coming today. Wells Fargo responded after I outed them and counsel for reading my email with proof that all of them had read my inquiry but had not yet responded.

Hello Mr. King,

I wanted to response to your email request.  Given that there is active litigation around his loan we decline to discuss the case in any more detail at this time.  Wells Fargo continues to work with borrowers on mortgage modifications and other options that may help them remain in their homes and avoid foreclosure when possible. We have modified more than 1 million loans since the beginning of 2009. 

Alfredo Padilla
Consumer Lending Communications 
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage   |   333 S. Grand Avenue, 11th Floor  |   Los Angeles, Calif.  90071
MAC E2064-11H
Tel  213-253-3379 |   Cell  213-369-6122   |   Fax  213-617-8135

This e-mail message is being sent solely for use by the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by phone or reply by e-mail, delete the original message and destroy all copies.  Thank you.

Note: That is important for him to say because Dual Tracking is illegal and all these people wanted was a loan mod to get out from under arguably usurious conditions.

All they wanted was a Mortgage Modification. All they got was a hassle and foreclosure pursuant to what appears to be unlawful Dual Tracking:  Carol, Penny and Patti at Upcountry Protea Farm are facing what appears to be an unlawful foreclosure as Carol and Penny take care of Patti, who sustained a brain injury many years ago.  Not that any of that matters too much to Bank of America because I had to document all of their shenanigans along with learned counsel, Seattle City Councilors and SAFE for months before they granted Seattle resident Jane Mair a loan mod that she needed after she sustained a catastrophic brain injury. Watch City Councilor Nick Licata declare war on corporate criminality on Ms. Mair's front porch here. Watch me accompany her to BoA to sign her Loan Mod in the video thumbnailed below and watch other videos with Ms. Mair linked below. 

Meanwhile Daneford and Ellareen Wright are facing a similar fate closer to Kahului. There are gofundme pages for both sets of homeowners:
Save our Farm From Fraudulent Banks.
Please Help Our Ohana Save Our Home.
To my observation as a former Escrow attorney, there are two common denominators in both cases: First is an apparently manufactured and false paper trail that purports to confer authority to foreclose. Second -- and perhaps more importantly -- is the presence of Judge Peter T. Cahill, who is allowing these cases to proceed without strict compliance with HRS 667-17attorney affirmation. As far as I know only Hawaii and New York State have this requirement, but without judicial enforcement it is nothing more than hot air. In NY Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman gets it, citing "systemic structural failings" so why can't Judge Cahill?
Some of the issues common for both cases include the presence of robosigning and whether or not a homeowner may challenge the Chain of Title and Assignments.  As to the former, I am aware that Essex County, MA Register John O'Brien has reviewed the Wright documents and confirmed that they are indeed robosigned but this Court is refusing to acknowledge any of that. O'Brien has gone on record after his audit with Marie McDonnell to state that his office is a corporate crime scene.  Seattle Washington is going to start conducting audits as well. Watch me discuss this matter with City Council here.
Essex County Register John O'Brien
I am also aware that a homeowner most certainly can challenge Assignments of Mortgage First Circuit Cosajay v. MERS C. A. No. 10-442-M, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160294 (Rhode Island 2013) and Culhane v. Aurora. As an aside, it is virtually impossible to find the Cosajay Appellate Court Decision reversing Judge McConnell online...  funny isn't it? Imagine that. I'll post it soon. Also, the Wright's social security numbers are on the Trust documents as a condition precedent. So how in the hell can Courts continue to allow the banks to use us as pawns in some kind of twisted life-scale chess game?


Production of several videos should be complete in the next week, with a lead-in video of an interview with Deadly Clear's Sydney Sullivan regarding Patents and 1003 Mortgage Applications as contemplated by the third video down in this journal entry from New York City. Meanwhile enjoy the WF and BoA videos I have produced on prior occasion, as both of these entities are involved in these cases:

Lastly, I believe that the Wrights are fighting for a Jury Trial that they paid for, but they inform me that Judge Cahill is not allowing it because he claims that foreclosures are a matter of Equity:

Well my research indicates that juries can indeed be drawn on mortgage cases.  See State Savings v. Young 53 Haw. 132; 488 P.2d 703; 1971 Haw. LEXIS 88 (1971). To the North in Oregon we have Bela and Eva Lengyel v. J.P. Morgan with a $10K Jury Verdict against J.P. Morgan. Those who protect the banksters don't want Jury Trials because Juries will punish them for their lawlessness, fancy that.

Further, assuming arguendo that it is a matter of equity, then the Plaintiffs must demonstrate Clean Hands according to the Clean Hands Doctrine. Bank of America recently lost out on that recently:  
Bank of America v. Pate 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3774 (First Dist. Ct. App March 16, 2015), in which the Court opined: 
The Shoe Foyer at the Wright home. 
“In this civil foreclosure case, the trial court found that Appellant Bank of America (the Bank) engaged in egregious and intentional misconduct in Appellee Pates’ (Pate) purchase of a residential home. Thus, based on the trial court’s finding that the Bank had unclean hands in this equity action, it did not reversibly err in denying the foreclosure action and granting a deed in lieu of foreclosure. In addition, the trial court did not err in ruling in favor of the Pates in their counterclaims for breach of contract and fraud, and awarding them $250,000 in punitive damages and $60,443.29 in compensatory damages….” 
The learned trial judge found that the Bank’s actions demonstrated its unclean hands; therefore, the Bank was not entitled to a foreclosure judgment in equity. 
Unclean hands is an equitable defense, akin to fraud, to discourage unlawful activity. See Congress Park Office Condos II, LLC v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co., 105 So. 3d 602, 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (“It is a self-imposed ordinance that closes the doors of a court of equity to one tainted with inequitableness or bad faith relative to the matter in which he seeks relief[.]”) (quoting Precision Instrument Mfg. Co. v. Auto. Maint. Mach. Co., 324 U.S. 806, 814 (1945))). The totality of the circumstances established the Bank’s unclean hands, precluding it from benefitting by its actions in a court of equity. Thus, the trial court did not err by denying the foreclosure action.
So by that measure then the Court should be demanding strict compliance with the Statute, right?  I will be contacting the bank attorneys over the weekend and look forward to their responses.

04 April 2015

KingCast Presents: On the Make at Blue Moon Tavern April 2015 -- Love these guys!



Freestyle Moments with the Sony AS 100V no lighting.
These cats are a blast!

03 April 2015

A KingCast/Mortgage Movies Minute with Federal Counsel in Meyer v. U.S. Bank.

U.S. Bank et al. got smacked in the Bankruptcy Court and now appeals. Plaintiff/Appellee Attorney Richard Jones asks "If I provide documents to this Court which contained material misrepresentations, would this Court let me off the hook?"



Judge Martinez:

"At what point does the Magistrate have an affirmative duty to investigate the veracity of these documents that are put before it?"


Richard Jones, Esq.:"Under the Deed of Trust Act strict compliance is required. Substantial compliance is insufficient. The problem Judge Overstreet was facing is NWTS did not even have procedure to investigate. That is material and goes to the Public Impact -- they were flying blind" (as admitted by Jeff Stenman -- see Ha Dao Jeff Stenman videos at Affordable Video Depo).


Judge Martinez:

"I'm troubled by that as well counselor. How were your clients prejudiced by this?"

Richard Jones, Esq.:
"The Owner and Holder are not disclosed.. the information they provide is a circle, a closed loop and there's no way to get through."

Josh Schaer, Esq.:

"The Owner is a Trust Your Honor so we provided everything necessary ..." To paraphrase "No Harm No Foul.... all of the information given out was proved accurate."

One thing that Schaer reportedly said, however, that strikes me as patently disingenuous is "Your Honor the Trustee relationship and activities are private matters......"

If so, Counselor, your position yesterday seems to be materially inconsistent with your abusive Anti-SLAPP rhetoric in cases involving Attorneys Scott Stafne and Ha Dao.  Just saying.... and you know I will ask you the difficult questions because that is what I am supposed to do, as you know from last month's tete à tete in Snohomish County with Marilynn Shcolnik as seen below. Unfortunately an attorney and her client were seated and talking behind my for the first portion of this event in which you tried and failed to prevent me from recording because you don't like this information being made public and on YouTube, is what you told the Court, remember?